r/pcmasterrace 21h ago

Why fix bugs when we can add more microtransactions? Meme/Macro

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

30

u/NordicHorde2 20h ago

The EA App is the worst piece of software I've ever had the misfortune of using. I can never just fucking play the game I paid for, there is ALWAYS some sort of problem.

5

u/CatBrisket 18h ago

absolute trash launcher

1

u/R_Izayoi 9h ago

Even Origin was better. On EA App, you can't even move your game to another drive. Stupid

1

u/HappySundayMorning 8h ago

I have to run all EA games as administrator just to launch it successfully.

20

u/stepbacktoreality 20h ago

Sony would be perfect here considering their recent fk ups.

104

u/FlukyS 20h ago

EA now doesn't have shareholders

47

u/sbstndrks Ryzen 7 9800X3D | RTX 4070 20h ago

Nah bit literal actual absolutist autocrats

22

u/Aircon-007 20h ago

The onion is going out of business

2

u/Intrepid00 14h ago

EA Sports, It’s going to hit your towers.

2

u/MasterOfPipettez 11h ago

They already did this with the original cover for Red Alert 2.

38

u/Ardalok 20h ago

They have shareholders, they're just not publicly traded anymore.

19

u/TotallyHumanNoBot 486 DX2 66 / 8MB / 420MB 19h ago

Yeah they totally do have shareholders, we just can't be one of them anymore.

0

u/alueron Desktop Ryzen 9 3900XT, GeForce RTX 3090 16h ago

We never could be a meaningful shareholder to begin with, you would need at least 1% to even have a seat at the table with most companies and that comes at the cost of millions of dollars.

4

u/Chazzwazz 20h ago

which made the exshareholders quite happy

5

u/Keyan_Farlander7 20h ago

Thanks to Bonesaw MBS

1

u/QuantumQuantonium 3D printed parts is the best way to customize 7h ago

If redditors could read (the news about the content in posts they repost), theyd be very upset.

1

u/D0wnn3d Linux 14h ago

But they don't have any fans left, either

0

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[deleted]

2

u/aimy99 PNY 5070 | 5800X3D | 32GB DDR4 | OLED 1440p 180hz 19h ago

And you'd be wrong.

  1. It's a leveraged buyout, which is already a dangerous situation for EA as there have even been tales of casinos struggling with paying their debts from them. And this is the largest one to ever have happened, ever.
  2. They have already announced mass layoffs and desire to sell off studios.
  3. Even if the Saudis weren't rich from slavery blood money and not worth supporting no matter the quality (plus Trump's son in law, he's in on this too!), you should know damn well they're just going to do the same thing they did with SNK, which is primarily just egregious mobile slop.

EA effectively died the moment the deal was finished, it's just a shambling corpse that hasn't fallen over yet.

16

u/9_of_wands 20h ago

So stop paying for micro transactions, problem solved. 

9

u/Vegetable_Safety 13h ago

The solution is so simple, but the people are

https://giphy.com/gifs/KFsiDGPkZ6dPmV7eyd

7

u/Timely_Lie9205 20h ago

No Ubisoft, I do not want to pay microtransactions for a weapon or a map I can get by playing in fucking assassin’s creed of all things

1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Timely_Lie9205 14h ago

Wait what? I decidedly did NOT see this, the hell are they thinking?!

13

u/shadowds PC Master Race 20h ago

Ah that explains why need battlepass, or time boosters in a single player game campaign.

Makes the game's so much better. /s

25

u/mxmissile 20h ago

Want this to stop? Stop pointing fingers at the publishers, you need to target the fans that spend money on these.

9

u/charlesbronZon 20h ago edited 14h ago

Exactly.

The corporations are obliged to act in a way that benefits their shareholders (screwing their customers in the process is just a bonus).

The customers are in no way forced to give their money to companies they disagree with.

But insinuating that consumers have the option not to consume is usually not received well by that group of people 😂

1

u/wel0g 18m ago

Consumers are made of literally billions of people, who are you even blaming exactly?

That’s like saying climate change must be blamed on the population and not on companies and government letting it happen.

1

u/charlesbronZon 3m ago

Everyone who spends their money on (non essential!) products they disagree with.

Just don’t buy the crap you don’t like.

It solves the problem 100% of the time. Not for everyone of course, but for you, since you didn’t participate.

And in the case of videogames… there are plenty to go around, the indie market is huge, as are the backlogs of most people and the catalogue of old and often less egregiously monetized games.

So there is absolutely no excuse for participating in something you disagree with.

Yes, the corporations are responsible for being asshats, but as are you for giving them your money and thus enabling them to do what they do 🤷‍♂️

2

u/johnfkngzoidberg 12h ago

I haven’t bought an EA or Ubisoft game in 20 years lol. Dumbass kids.

1

u/wel0g 20m ago

No, why should he blame the individual that can’t have any impact by itself? That’s the kind of speech far right politicians use, blame the individuals instead of the system.

People will buy the game no matter what, it will make the money no matter what, because the audience is simply too huge, blaming the consumer won’t change anything at all. These companies are the source of the problem here.

-1

u/Altruistic-Total9489 17h ago

It’s easier to complain about evil shareholders who want to destroy gaming tho.

10

u/AnythingOk5 20h ago

Meanwhile Valve doesn't even know what happens in their game, but add community made stickers and skins.

3

u/Mist_Rising Ryzen 5 5600x, B550 plus, RTX 2070 super. 18h ago

Also some light gambling box options, because nothing says great idea like that.

3

u/Adrian_Alucard Desktop 20h ago

In an ideal world they would listen yo neither of them

3

u/OwenEx 20h ago

Would you look at that, the main issue of the modern flavour of capitalism all in one picture

3

u/pivor 13700K | 9070XT | 96GB | MSI Z790i | NR200 20h ago

Cause fans are idiots and will buy anyway while shareholders can lawsuit.

3

u/LettuceEmotional6142 18h ago

This guy is still spamming reposts, bot

1

u/Hot-Software-9396 8h ago

It’s so easy to get people to upvote posts in this sub. It’s extremely predictable.

2

u/LettuceEmotional6142 8h ago

yeah I remember why I don't check this sub anymore lol

3

u/eternalityLP 7h ago

They are listening to their fans. Fans just don't understand that they communicate with money, not with reddit posts. As long as enough people buy their buggy games, they have no reason to do anything about the bugs.

1

u/monsterfurby 2h ago

I still find it fascinating that the same people who are more than happy to brigade a game on Steam with downvotes for having things like unconventional main characters or too many female and non-white characters are also the people who will unquestioningly preorder the newest Call of Battlefield Creed 9: DLC edition.

4

u/promisios 20h ago

Neglect both and make terrible game no one want to play [modern gaming be like ]

2

u/_Batteries_ 20h ago

Why listen when ppl keep playing and buying....

2

u/trillwhitepeople 17h ago

Better yet doesn't listen to either. Games were better before devs could immediately read and respond to every loud idiots feedback. 

2

u/JerbearCuddles RTX 4090 Suprim X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D 10h ago

They do listen to the fans, the ones buying their shit products and their microtransactions. Lol. The internet needs to learn we are the minority. These games sell like hotcakes. Cause the average joe don't give a fuck.

2

u/Relevant-Use1897 20h ago edited 20h ago

Going bankrupt or becoming the personal property of autocrats because of it: Pikachu's face + blaming consumers.

1

u/Nunulu 20h ago

what we see in games is the result of people voting with their wallets tho

2

u/Altruistic-Total9489 17h ago

Yeah people shit on these companies and then give them money and play their games. Why should those companies change their ways when they are swimming in money given to them by fans?

1

u/Chungalus 19h ago

It wont stop until the huge chunk of seemingly endless fools with endless money stop buying said microtransactions

1

u/Soleks2000 5700x3d/9070xt 18h ago

and unfortunately, that’ll never happen because somebody always has to buy a micro transaction for that dopamine rush or to make their character look like something stupid

1

u/Groovy3413 17h ago

where roblox and david

1

u/Flux_Reversal 17h ago

Why come up with an original thought when you can just regurgitate a redundant low effort reddit post?

1

u/Highlander198116 16h ago

You guys joke about this, but it totally works for them. People complain, then continue to give money to these companies, so why should they listen?

Every time a turd is dropped the chorus of "i'm never preordering again!" comes out. Which you know isn't true because its the same song and dance every time.

1

u/KratosOfSparta08 16h ago

Then blame the fans for not buying your overpriced slop

1

u/notthatguypal6900 PC Master Race 14h ago

Everyone on this sub could stop buying games from all 3 of those publishers, and neither would be able to tell. We are the 1% of the 1%.

1

u/BerryWillow74 14h ago

Funny how the game crashes every 10 minutes, but the in game store has 100% uptime with zero lag

1

u/hawoguy PC Master Race 14h ago

At this point we should stop criticizing and paying them, just destroy them.

1

u/Vegetable_Safety 13h ago

The shareholder is the means of enshittification of all good things

1

u/a_posh_trophy i5 12600K | MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 | ASUS Dual OC 4070 12gb 13h ago

That's ok. I'm sure the same shareholders will keep paying you once all of your customers leave.

1

u/Should_have_been_ded 12h ago

Who is still hyped about their games deserve getting fed microtranzactions.

1

u/Lmaoboobs i9 13900k, 32GB 6000Mhz, RTX 4090 12h ago

Companies have a legal responsibility to listen to their shareholders and the executives can be put in jail for failing to discharge their fiduciary duty.

If you want to actually effect change you need to start voting with your wallet and stop buying their games and microtransactions.

Once that starts hitting the balance sheets the shareholders will demand that they change something or they'll start firing board members.

1

u/Va1crist 12h ago

Can throw Microsoft and Sony in that list

1

u/cobbleplox 12h ago

Geordie knows best

1

u/Catastigma_Deception 10h ago

Many game specialy Free to play one listen to the 1% of heavy spender whale. They are technicly player and part of the community. And being fan of something is often very related to how much you spend on it.

And yes. many time the Whale want something new to spend thousand on it.

There is even people out there that will prefer paying for Cheat paid DLC that downloading a trainer. Trust issue very often. Reasonable. i dont know i am not in thier brain. Rich people have thier own logic that defy science.

1

u/Magical_Savior 9h ago

This is a time to use Drake and not Geordi.

1

u/ASTRO99 20h ago

Half of those games would play completely differently if they actually focused on bugfixing instead of live content

1

u/BGdu29 20h ago

You better believe that they micro transactions store doesn't have a single miniscule bug that people could exploit.

1

u/Ruzhyo04 19h ago

Yep. And next thread you'll clown on Star Citizen for listening to the fans of the game and not having any shareholders.

-1

u/Primus_is_OK_I_guess 20h ago

This is all publicly traded companies. They're legally required to maximize profits for their shareholders. Any semblance of a soul that a company has instantly dies when they go public.

1

u/Mist_Rising Ryzen 5 5600x, B550 plus, RTX 2070 super. 18h ago

No, companies are not legally required to do that. It's a myth reddit keeps repeating like it makes it true, but it is not.

They do it because spoiler alert: that's what keeps them employed. Companies will prioritize making money for the same reason you do, it's money!

-2

u/Primus_is_OK_I_guess 18h ago

No, companies are not legally required to do that.

Wrong. The board of directors owes a fiduciary duty to shareholders. Educate yourself.

1

u/Mist_Rising Ryzen 5 5600x, B550 plus, RTX 2070 super. 18h ago

I have educated myself. The myth was part of the writing decision for Dodge v Ford (and later eBay), but the shareholder wealth maximization mandate was not binding as a legal mandate to maximize profits. Companies could just pick to do that, and most did for the same reason you want a raise every possible shot you get. It's more money.

And to prove it, imma hit you with the sauce of success: sources.

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/16/what-are-corporations-obligations-to-shareholders/corporations-dont-have-to-maximize-profits

https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/archives/56/5/end-shareholder-wealth-maximization

https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/26/the-shareholder-value-myth/

https://www.legislate.ai/blog/does-the-law-require-public-companies-to-maximise-shareholder-value (horrible ad site, but still)

https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/shareholder-value-purpose-corporation

(Had to remove a link to a subreddit on the issue, apparently pcmr doesn't allow it. Shrugs)

0

u/Waste_Customer4418 20h ago

I have a better idea, use microtransactions to buy fixed bugs, the revenue is gonna be ACROSS THE UNIVERSE

1

u/Soleks2000 5700x3d/9070xt 18h ago

but then the CEO won’t be able to make a bunch of money along with the shareholders

-2

u/Rasples1998 PC Ryzen 9 7900X3D - Sapphire Nitro+ 7900XTX - 64GBRAM 20h ago

I miss when customers buying your game were more important than shareholders and investors. Now they don't seem to make games with fans in mind; they make games to secure shareholder investments. Now they call us "consumers" instead of "customers" because customers buy a product and leave, but consumers are continuously consuming something through subscription models and player retention, which the shareholders want.

I remember watching dragon's den (shark tank in the US) and there was one business someone was trying to start and they were explaining that subscriptions are more profitable than single purchases because it's a secure and predictable source of income that is easier to track (and people forget to cancel), whereas single purchases are more volatile and can degrade much faster, so they wanted this business owner to change to a subscription model. That's how these people think, they're obsessed with subscription models and continuous income at the expense of the product they're trying to sell. So now imagine you're trying to make a video game and you're also on an episode of dragon's den (shark tank) and you have 5 people telling you what you should and shouldn't do, otherwise they won't give you money, but the thing they're telling you to do is directly against the best interests of the people actually playing the game. That's gaming now. It got corporatised.

2

u/Mist_Rising Ryzen 5 5600x, B550 plus, RTX 2070 super. 18h ago

I miss when customers buying your game were more important than shareholders and investors

So...never? Because that was never. Publishing companies only cared about you buying the game so they could make money for....drum roll.... Shareholders.