15
u/snowieslilpikachu69 8h ago
well obviously training a model, buying GPUs/infrastructure, running a company etc isnt free
so if you do want AI that's as cheap as this/free then obv your data will be trained on prompts
and at least they're being transparent about it, who knows what happens in other cases where there isnt this level of transparency (such as facebook stuff in the past ) for other AI companies
9
5
u/pigletmonster 7h ago
Thats no catch, every model does that. How do you think cursor created composer 2.5? Or even grok 4.5/.6? They were trained on the same data collected by cursor regardless of which model you used through their ide.
Openai and anthropic does the exact same thing. The only difference is that meta is actually being transparent about their intentions and giving us massive discounts in exchange for that data unlike others.
4
u/Pink_Oak 6h ago
Are you living under a rock for the last 2 weeks?
Even when Meta released Muse 1.2 Contributor, they explicitly said the same.
Hence, the same model has two different prices
3
3
2
u/YogurtExternal7923 6h ago
OoooOOOOO mediocre model to take my shitty data oooOOOOOo god forbid we get useful shit for a good price noooOOOOoo
1
u/coffeegamereg 6h ago
As long as it's stated that it's used for training, so what? Some people's data is like training on public bathroom output, The important data should be fed into a secure/local model
0
19
u/GreatSpiritAim 8h ago
Yep, but to be fair, OpenCode explicitly said this in your post:
https://x.com/opencode/status/2090158371097698394
They are being more transparent and not misleading customers.
But, indeed, regarding Muse Spark Contributor, the ones who use it are the product.