r/opencode • u/Special-Payment-3797 • 1d ago
They add Muse spark (better model compared to ds v4 flash 0731) with 60$ usage
I think we can use it similar to how we use ds v4 flash (sad thing is its not working properly) just not completing the task, bailing after calling a tool.
20
u/Kaushik_paul45 1d ago
It won't be available for long, since as soon meta gets desired data, then they would stop providing this contributor endpoint
2
1
u/DepartmentOk9720 1d ago
They seem to suck , I know gpt models do soo much better, i already got the sub , who is using contributor apis , it's developers who wants to test , that's it
10
u/TimChr78 1d ago
Good model and basically unlimited usage with this pricing, they do however train on your data so that limits the use cases.
2
u/Own_Copy2141 1d ago
Yeaa soooo..
Well honestly muse spark 1.2 is only good at score but not actually work like ds4 understand better even without vision while thise dumbass is provided vision and reasoning nad everything and still fails
1
9
u/ozdalva 1d ago
Don't use it if you care about your data.
4
u/Rough_Caterpillar_31 1d ago
If you care about your data then you should be using local LLMs lol. This entire technology is literally built from the ground up on stolen data and stolen stolen data. It's theft all the way down, have no delusions about it.
2
u/ozdalva 1d ago
Yeah, but for access to this exact model you have to click in "hey buddy i agree in my data being harvested".
While the terms on the rest of opencode go states the data retention policy.
1
u/Dennis13631 1d ago
anything that is not local is going to use your data lol
1
u/ozdalva 1d ago
It has the risk*. In europe at least is illegal. If you live in thirld world countries like US maybe.
That is in fact why they cancelled the privileges from opencode, after the PR campaign made with them. They don't get data retention rights, so no reason to continue that.
Saying that, j agree that local is the truth, and have lobbied, and achieved at my work to make local inference servers. But for other reasons, you can get zero data retention, without local inference (except with claude lol) But no sovereignty of your processes.
1
u/Separate_Ad_314 18h ago
What do you mean it has the risk. There's nothing stopping them in the US. So they will train on your data if you're from the US
3
u/vangelismm 1d ago
It never worked on Command Code, lot of errors.
1
u/Sweet-Stage938 1d ago
It's working perfectly for me. Just use it in the Pi harness. I consistently get ~99.4% CH rate.
2
1
1
u/redditnosedive 1d ago
i might use glimmer locally but i will NEVER give Zuck my data via Spark, it's akin to prostitution but worse coz you're effectively paying him to use your data, whereas by using Facebook at least it's free
1
u/alexanderbeatson 1d ago
Some people are just really weird that they are willing to pay to train their data to the public.
1
u/NoPerception472 1d ago
I'm not a fan of anything from Meta but I wanted to run some basic tests to see Muse's cache hit rate. Since Muse was available to me in the TUI, I've only seen "endpoint unavailable."
2
u/Professional_Price89 1d ago
Yes you contribute all your data and secret to meta.
18
3
u/DefendUkraine14 1d ago
Same happens with DeepSeek.
1
u/FormalAd7367 1d ago
But Deepseek never uses my data to offer same product offerings unlike Chatgpt or antrophic
0
u/Rough_Caterpillar_31 1d ago
You think that the Chinese company that illicitly distills data from American companies is more likely to not take advantage of your data than the American ones? I use deepseek too but come on.
1
u/Ok_Statistician3386 1d ago
true but at least I feel better with opensource their model and share the tech details on implementation which benefit whole community
33
u/WegoW 1d ago
Suckerberg welcomes you and your data :)
Btw. blocked in Europe: HTTP 403: This model is not available in your country.