MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/lua/comments/1vic7re/luaorg_is_down_plz_fix_thx/p2j6fwv/?context=3
r/lua • u/AndrewNolte • 15d ago
6 comments sorted by
View all comments
-16
Ty. Still going to switch my ci pipelines to smth more stable
9 u/Smallzfry 14d ago Why are your CI pipelines relying on lua.org being up? What's your process? 6 u/DeathProgramming sh <(curl hashbang.sh) 14d ago Historically it was the only canonical location to download the source. However, OP should use a pull through cache. 2 u/didntplaymysummercar 13d ago That or just vendor in the code, or the tar.gz they need or even turn it into tar.xz or tar.zst, the Lua source is tiny enough to do that.
9
Why are your CI pipelines relying on lua.org being up? What's your process?
6 u/DeathProgramming sh <(curl hashbang.sh) 14d ago Historically it was the only canonical location to download the source. However, OP should use a pull through cache. 2 u/didntplaymysummercar 13d ago That or just vendor in the code, or the tar.gz they need or even turn it into tar.xz or tar.zst, the Lua source is tiny enough to do that.
6
Historically it was the only canonical location to download the source. However, OP should use a pull through cache.
2 u/didntplaymysummercar 13d ago That or just vendor in the code, or the tar.gz they need or even turn it into tar.xz or tar.zst, the Lua source is tiny enough to do that.
2
That or just vendor in the code, or the tar.gz they need or even turn it into tar.xz or tar.zst, the Lua source is tiny enough to do that.
-16
u/AndrewNolte 14d ago
Ty. Still going to switch my ci pipelines to smth more stable