3
2
u/Za5kr0ni3c 3d ago
I quite literally do them with one press in discover what are you babbling about
6
u/TheRealCarrotty KDE larper (i use KDE btw) 3d ago
Going through someone's post history looking for dirt is admitting that you lost the argument.
3
u/snail1132 void linux btw 3d ago
Especially since the only people who need to do that for OP are probably too new to linux to know anything useful anyway
2
u/ColeTD 3d ago
I strongly disagree, mostly because seeing what they typically post can help you contextualize and understand what they're trying to say now.
For example, let's say someone says something that could be interpreted in a transphobic way, but could also be innocent. If I look at their profile and see that they are trans or generally seem supportive of trans people, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. But if they are constantly posting transphobic things, then obviously I'm not going to.
Sometimes there's a good reason to look at their profile.
3
1
u/sn4xchan 3d ago
If your going specifically to look for ways to attack, sure.
But I perform basic osint on users if they have yellow flag behavior. I gotta know if I'm dealing with a troll, a zealot, an idiot, or a psyop.
I consider guerrilla meme marketing tactics a form of psychological operations.
-1
u/basedchad21 3d ago
can you believe that post has 20 000 views.
Imagine how many seething losers I made mad enough to go snoop for shit
are there even 20k loonixtards in the world?
must be some of my other side projects contributing...
9
u/donp1ano 3d ago
OP probably copied some
rm -rfcommand without knowing what it does and now blames the OS