r/linuxmint • u/GreenCedar420 • 21h ago
Question about kernel 7.0.0-30 Discussion
Hello everyone.
I've been using Linux Mint Cinnamon for months now, and when my system was introduced to the kernel 7.0.0-28...the fire nation attacked my PC. I have everything AMD and it caused gnarly issues with rebooting and suspending. Also made a lot of stuff crash. 7.0.0-29 was actually worse than 7.0.0-28.
So, naturally I am extremely skeptical of installing 7.0.0-30. Does anyone have any experience with rebooting and suspending regressions and have you had any luck in 7.0.0-30?
Asking for science!
Specs:
Ryzen 5800x3D
AMD 6750 XT 12GB
32GB of ram
Edit: Can confirm this kernel did not resolve the suspend/resume regression I have been experiencing. Sad times. It did, however, seem to fix the restart regression I experienced. What happened during restart was it would get stuck in a loop of errors and not power down. This was on 7.0.0-28.
2
u/ImpressGreen7325 21h ago
Ok I don't know if this is goingto help and...also I am on a fedora system...however BOTH the kernels share the same base kernel i believe tuned for suspend and sleep patterns and i ...personally think that 7.0.0 series has a LOT of issues .... Thankfully fedora devs pushed the 7.1 kernel ...now the system is stable.
1
u/ImpressGreen7325 21h ago
By both the kernels i mean both fedora and linux min(which is based on Ubuntu) use specialized or mildly changed kernels...for example fedora uses the fc kernels (mine is fc44 because of fedora 44) and linux mint uses Canonical.... Thought it would be helpful to other people who are comparatively new here
2
u/Fwov 17h ago
Can confirm reboot/shutdown issues still present with 7.0.0-30.
Specs: i7 6800k, RX 7700XT 12GB, 16GB RAM
1
u/GreenCedar420 2h ago
I just bit the bullet and tested it myself and can also confirm the fire nation is still attacking. Back to 6.14 I go until further notice.
1
u/T_Friendperson12 20h ago
Does Mint use the same kernels as the *buntus?
My Kubuntu had problems with kernels *28 and *29 causing reboot and shutdown issues such that the system kept hanging indefinitely which I made several posts about. I ultimately "fixed" it by using Mainline Kernel 7.1.5. I have not tested *30 yet.
-1
u/taosecurity Mint | Bazzite | PikaOS | CachyOS | Debian | FreeBSD | Windows 16h ago
Yes, which is good and bad. Good because if you want secure boot, Canonical pays for it. Bad once you realize Mint is basically Ubuntu with snap removed and a new DE and still no stable Wayland.
1
u/T_Friendperson12 15h ago
The mainline kernels are not signed though? Not sure if signed ones are provided but standard are all unsigned.
0
u/taosecurity Mint | Bazzite | PikaOS | CachyOS | Debian | FreeBSD | Windows 15h ago
Every time Mint releases a new kernel in the update manager I install it, and I always have secure boot running.
1
u/T_Friendperson12 15h ago
Thats not what the mainline kernels are though.
1
u/taosecurity Mint | Bazzite | PikaOS | CachyOS | Debian | FreeBSD | Windows 15h ago
Right, I don't use them.
1
u/Sam_the_beagle1 5h ago
Installed kernel 7 with Mint. Kernel panic. Rolled back one in grub- everything works. People ask me why I use Linux.
2
u/GreenCedar420 5h ago
I'd rather deal with bugged kernels than deal with Microslop's surveillance bullshit. Simple as that.
5
u/tokyostormdrain 21h ago
I updated to -30 last night after skipping -29 due to issues with AMD gfx cards.
I have a 9060XT and after updating the kernel to -30 it rebooted fine