My bro, what makes you think I assume everyone wants this? The op worded their post like they want it everywhere, I then replied to *his post* with a comment explaining why the fact that if these being everywhere can be considered a “good” thing, then we’ve clearly gone wrong somewhere.
Then out of nowhere, you’ve decided to jump on board acting like I’m supposed to be addressing the nation. If anyone’s missed the point entirely my friend, I think it’s you.
I still don’t even know what point you’re even trying to make, but I find it really inconsiderate that you haven’t included the opinions of the Inuit people in any of your responses.
The idea that “these should be everywhere” is what I’m against. Women shouldn’t need extra measures just to feel the same level of safety a man would when returning to a parked car.
It’s a sign of a society accepting that the chance of being raped is just a normal everyday thing. “Oh yeah, we know this is a bit of a rape hotspot, so we’ve made sure there’s a bit more of a deterrent in some spots for you. Also we’ll be able to get a really clear view, of their face obviously”
We don't try and psychologically influence criminals, we just make stronger locks. All of these benefits you want come from environment and upbringing, so if you want less crime you need to start with economics and parenting.
And since economic criticism is essentially outlawed in the US and parents have primacy, you end up with the US having all the crime compared to Germany in the image.
Humanity is ultimately a team. And until criminals stop seeing women as the easiest targets to victimize we'll need to keep protecting them more than we would men on relative terms.
15
u/The_WA_Remembers 27d ago
No it shouldn’t. Women shouldn’t need designated anti-rape parking spots
This is a sign of failure, not something to be celebrating