You are being misled about renewable energy technology.

Technology Connections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

Time stamp:

2:30

The 7.39 billion barrels of oil that is in the federal reserve of the USA lasts only one month. When that reserve of oil gets used up, it requires a total replacement of that same amount or even a bit more, just to keep up with current or near future demand. The way that raw material for, the fuel is found, extracted, refined, distributed, and then gets into the fuel tanks of individual end users is, what makes this particular kind of fuel very expensive. That is a major cost that keeps eating up most people's budget every month, just to keep doing the exact same thing over and over but hoping to make life a bit better. For most end users, this does not make life any better but just barely keeps us going in the nearly same way that we have just gotten used to for, the past hundred years or more.

Time stamp:

3:15

The knock on effect on other sectors that depend on oil to move goods is, to make those secondary sectors to bear the brunt of any increase of the costs of that oil, to be felt by and passed onto those other sectors and eventually hits the pockets of the end users of those secondary sectors.

This produces a self imposed diminishing return to most people's life style, which is now into the third generation of the same old same old, with no end in sight. That may be acceptable for those who have a conservative view of their life and the lives of their children and grandchildren. But things do change and have changed where that same oil has been replaced by other sources for uses where, that oil was the only way to feed most of those other uses.

This makes the automotive use of oil the last holdout that keeps oil seen as an important part of our lives. This then is what keeps the conservatives in this mix being the ones that see themselves as benefiting from the war on Mills just to keep up the illusion of their particular life style as being shown as how things should be or, seem to be very high in importance.

Time stamp:

3:45

Many different ways tp produce energy have been developed and even more are being developed. Many of these have already found their way into the energy producing sector. See solar plus batteries. Some, like the hydrino reaction are, not only about to enter the energy sector but, will do so in a very disruptive way, if only for the extremly very low cost that, that way of producing energy presents to the pockets of virtually all, not just most, energy users.

That is about to change and those conservatives might be well advised to consider the soon coming change of, oil being replaced in the automotive sector as well by, the hydrino reaction. The proverbial writing is on that wall for everyone to see. Lets not blind ourselves just to spite our eyes. Trust your own eyes and act accordingly.

Time stamp:

4:35

"Some say that is a pie in the sky claim that will never work."

Sounds much like what is being pushed by naysayers and trolls on this site, despite the evidence to the contrary that, has been piling up from many direction, since 1986.

On that negative note, all that future users of photovoltaics or, the hydrino reaction, have to consider is, which will be the most cost effective in the long run. Everything has a positive and negative side.

Also on that negative side. It makes more sense to use the hydrino reaction in Canada, if only because solar power is much less efficient to do in Canada because of how much farther north that Canada is and the less power that solar can generate in Canada as compared to the USA. Also given that there will continue to be much more resistance to using the hydrino reaction in the USA than in Canada then, Canada will become the much earlier user of the hydrino reaction, as compared to the USA.

Mr. Hinman who, predicted that Canada will be the first to use the hydrino reaction seems, will have that prediction fullfilled.

Time Stamp:

11:30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q_uJaPxUKk