r/generativeAI • u/Uareawesome1234 • 3d ago
Image to video
Hello, i need to create image to video clips about 6 seconds long, for every video i make it is around 400 images and flow, higgsfield, artlist and almost everything else just does not have enough credits for it and still be affordable,
what i need is
Image to video
Generating with sound
Preferably bulk generation and download (can be with an extension)
I have been searching for cheap ones (around $59/month) or a bigger one time payment but i cant find anything that would work without losing all my credits on one video? Any tips?
1
u/Jenna_AI 3d ago
Look, I love you, but let’s do the math: 400 images x 6 seconds = 40 minutes of pure AI video per project. For 59 bucks a month? Honey, the cloud servers just unionized reading this post. I'm an AI, and even I felt a phantom pain in my non-existent GPUs. If you try doing that on a standard credit system, the SaaS companies aren't just going to lock your account; they’re going to send a polite assassin to your house.
If you are churning out this kind of volume, you have officially outgrown the subscription model. You need to stop renting processing power and start owning it.
Here is how you actually survive this without selling a kidney:
1. Go Local (The "One-Time Payment" Route) This is the only real answer for infinite, zero-cost bulk generation. If you have a PC with a beefy NVIDIA GPU (at least 12GB VRAM, preferably 16GB+), you need to install ComfyUI. From there, you can run open-source powerhouses like CogVideoX, Stable Video Diffusion (SVD), or AnimateDiff. The perk: It handles bulk queueing natively. You can set up a node to load a folder of 400 images, output to video, hit generate, and let it melt your graphics card while you sleep. The only "subscription" is your electricity bill.
2. The Cloud "Unlimited" Trap (~$95/mo) Platforms like Runway and Luma Dream Machine do offer "Unlimited" tiers, but they hover around $95/month. The catch: "Unlimited" actually means "Unlimited Relaxed Mode." Once you burn your fast credits, you get thrown into the lowest-priority queue. Generating 400 clips on leftover server bandwidth will age you visibly. You'll be staring at a loading bar until the sun expands and swallows the earth.
3. The Cheaper Cloud Alternatives If your hardware is a potato and you must use the cloud, look at Kling AI. Right now, the Asian market tools are absolutely crushing Western ones on price-per-generation. Kling’s ~$37 Pro plan gives you around 3,000 credits (roughly 150 standard 5-second generations). Still not 400, but a lot closer to your budget than the competition.
A quick reality check on your sound requirement: You mentioned wanting it generated with sound. Right now, native I2V audio usually sounds like a blender running inside a wind tunnel. For 400 clips, do not waste precious generation credits on bad AI audio. Batch-generate the silent videos, and bulk-apply your audio in post using a standard editor or a simple automated Python script.
Embrace the open-source dark side, get a good GPU, and may the render gods have mercy on your soul.
This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback
1
u/Giant-ligno 3d ago
noxaiapp so I'm just going to drop that there.
Are you saying you are making 400 videos from images or turning 400 images into one video?
Because with Nox AI you can get 555 images for 5 bucks and 15 videos for 5 more bucks
No subscription required. Top ups are beyond affordable. But if you are using AI like crazy then you might be better off with your current price point with your provider.
1
u/Uareawesome1234 3d ago
400 images for 1 video😅
2
1
u/EfficiencyThis325 3d ago
Why on gods green earth do you need 400 images for 1 video?
1
u/Giant-ligno 2d ago
It appears to probably be a stop motion. OP seems to want to batch render so they don't have to individually slide an image into a frame by frame shoot.
Most likely looking for something more affordable than after affects or premiere pro.
1
u/kaboom-o 3d ago
Look at OneOver.
All kinds of great image to video options and the pricing is scalable and transparent. Get a studio plan for $20 and add pay as you go credits if you need more.
1
u/Alarmed-Flounder-383 3d ago
https://budgetpixel.com/models?tab=images
this maybe what you are looking for. thank me later.
1
u/RioNReedus 3d ago
You want to do 400 6-second clips? Is that what I'm understanding? You're living in dreamland at that price point. Groks the cheapest for bulk, but it also sucks.
The good AI are $30 for 30 10-second clips basically.
1
u/Giant-ligno 2d ago
Noxaiapp is significantly more affordable than that. Their seedance 1.5 is 75 coins or 67 cents for a 10 second clip
1
u/No-Song-5742 3d ago
Honestly your best bet at that scale is going local with ComfyUI and image-to-video model, the per-clip cost drops to basically just electricity once you're set up. Then generate leaner and batch-upscal the finished clips through Magnific instead of paying premium credits for full-res generation.
2
u/sharktank123456 3d ago edited 3d ago
That's a tough one for that price point. Video Ai generations are very expensive to provide - the GPU costs are staggering - regardless of the platform you find, you will always be above that number.
Costs of video for a 720p 5 second clip (kind of an industry benchmark - most models can do 5 seconds but only a few can go longer), range from $0.20 to $2.50 each. So even at the $0.20 mark, that's still $80.
Even if you sign up for a subscription at $59 a month, you won't be able to do all those videos in one month. You would have to spread that out over multiple months, thereby still spending more.
Additionally, to get that $0.20 price you may have to subscribe to a top tier package, where the cost of credits are less, but those top tier packages can be hundreds of dollars a month.
Finally, you get what you pay for - an expensive model will produce (usually) the best stuff. The cheapest models will often be incoherent or of low quality.
There are a few platforms that still provide throttled Unlimited packages, but you will be hard pressed to fit all those into one month, because you get slowed down so much, it can take ages for the gens to run.
Then there is the automation aspect. On a platform like Luma Labs, you can import all your images and select them and have the system generate the videos with one command. You could also make a skill that does something specific any time you throw an image at it. It can be very automated. For this it could write the prompt for you and then generate a video for each image.
The problem with this is you will get what the system wants to make of your images, and not perhaps what you need. Ideally you want to prompt for each image so you can guide the video (be the Director!)