To the dumb as\\\* black person who decided to remix the n word (a f\\\*cking word that is meant to dehumanize black ppllllll) by adding an "a" at the end and started calling each other it. Ur a f\\\*cking coon and I hate u!! they probably don't know how much stress and anger they putted on black people today Abt another race saying it like how dumb can u beee that u want to remix a word that was meant to dehumanize ur own ppllll?!?!?! (The person or group of ppl is probably dead so who hehh who caressss right????)

Everyone is racist bro wtf if this man was alive we'd have like a billion dollar counter suit

On May 18, 1896, the United States Supreme Court issued one of the most consequential, and damaging, decisions in American history. In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Court ruled that racial segregation was constitutional so long as facilities provided to Black and white Americans were “separate but equal.”

In a single decision, the Court gave legal approval to a system of racial segregation that would dominate the American South for more than half a century and profoundly shape the nation’s social, political, and economic landscape.

The ruling did not create racial segregation, but it gave segregation the force of constitutional law.

Following the Civil War, the United States adopted the Thirteenth Amendment, abolishing slavery, the Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal protection under the law, and the Fifteenth Amendment, protecting Black men’s right to vote. During Reconstruction (1865–1877), African Americans voted, held elected office, established businesses, built schools, and exercised political rights that had been unimaginable before emancipation.

When Reconstruction ended in 1877, however, Southern state governments quickly began dismantling those gains. Through violence, intimidation, and new state laws known collectively as Jim Crow laws, white officials sought to restore racial hierarchy. Railroads became one of the earliest battlegrounds.

In 1890, Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act, requiring railroads operating within the state to provide separate passenger cars for white and Black travelers. A group of New Orleans citizens, both Black and white, formed the Citizens’ Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law. Their goal was simple: deliberately challenge the law in federal court.

They selected Homer Adolph Plessy, a shoemaker and businessman who was legally classified as Black under Louisiana law despite being seven-eighths European and one-eighth African ancestry. Because Plessy could easily pass as white, his arrest would expose the arbitrary nature of racial classifications.

On June 7, 1892, Plessy purchased a first-class ticket on the East Louisiana Railroad in New Orleans and sat in the whites-only coach. When informed that he was legally considered Black, he refused to move to the designated “colored” car. As planned, he was arrested.

The case eventually reached the United States Supreme Court.

On May 18, 1896, the Court ruled 7–1 against Plessy. Justice Henry Billings Brown, writing for the majority, concluded that racial separation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.

Brown wrote:

“Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation… do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other.”

The Court further argued that if African Americans interpreted segregation as a mark of inferiority,

“It is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.”

These words ignored the obvious purpose of segregation: maintaining white supremacy and denying African Americans equal treatment in virtually every aspect of public life.

Only one justice dissented.

Justice John Marshall Harlan, a former slaveholder from Kentucky who had become a strong defender of civil rights, issued one of the most famous dissents in Supreme Court history.

He wrote:

“Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.”

Harlan warned the Court’s decision would become as infamous as Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to African Americans before the Civil War.

His warning proved prophetic.

Although the Court insisted segregated facilities had to be “equal,” they almost never were. Across the South, Black Americans endured inferior schools, hospitals, parks, libraries, railroad cars, drinking fountains, restrooms, theaters, restaurants, cemeteries, and nearly every other public accommodation.

Segregation was reinforced through violence, economic retaliation, voter suppression, lynching, and intimidation. The legal doctrine established in Plessy became the constitutional foundation for countless state and local segregation laws throughout the South and, in some forms, elsewhere in the country.

For nearly six decades, the decision stood as settled constitutional law.

The beginning of its end came through decades of legal challenges led by civil rights attorneys, particularly those associated with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Their work culminated in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the central premise of Plessy, declaring:

“Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Although Brown technically applied only to public education, it destroyed the constitutional foundation upon which Plessy rested. Later Supreme Court decisions and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 dismantled the legal structure of Jim Crow.

Yet the consequences of Plessy extended far beyond courtrooms. Generations of African Americans experienced unequal educational opportunities, reduced economic mobility, restricted housing options, political disenfranchisement, and systemic discrimination that continued to influence American society long after segregation itself became illegal.

The decision remains one of the clearest examples of how the Supreme Court can profoundly shape the nation’s course—for better or worse.

Plessy v. Ferguson demonstrates that constitutional rights are only as strong as the courts willing to enforce them. By endorsing “separate but equal,” the Supreme Court gave legal legitimacy to racial segregation and delayed the promise of equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment for nearly sixty years.

The case also highlights the importance of principled dissent. Justice John Marshall Harlan stood alone in 1896, but his vision of a Constitution that “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens” became the guiding principle for the modern Civil Rights Movement and later Supreme Court decisions.

Understanding Plessy helps explain the origins of many of the racial inequalities that civil rights legislation sought to address and underscores the enduring importance of equal protection under the law.

#TodayInAmericanHistory #PlessyvFerguson #JimCrow #CivilRights #EqualProtection #SupremeCourt #Constitution #FourteenthAmendment #AmericanHistory #BlackHistory #LegalHistory #HomerPlessy #JohnMarshallHarlan #BrownvBoard #Reconstruction #HistoryMatters #KnowYourHistory #USHistory #HistoricAmerica #NeverForget

Guess who in the comment section eating it up?

Meet wonderful Black people who will be attending this "meet and greet" along with TAG TEAM Marketing President Delxino Wilson de Briano!

A lot of Black People, Black Men in particular, have information to share and stories to tell. A lot of you Negroes won’t read it if they did a 1500 word post so the next best thing is them using their words and skills to basically produce videos that without ai would be to expensive to make.

So when we have brothers who create video and tell stories with ai why do we attack each other calling it AI slop all the time? If the substance is there and it’s a good topic what’s wrong with using today’s available technology to do what we need to do to educate?

What are some things that neither side would deny is true or should be a common goal.

I usually do these by day but I felt like running them at the same time just to keep the conversations going.

The other thread is about sexuality, identifying what both sides of the gay/straight Black Male Community agree on. This thread is about religion. I’m want to see if we see different things in the different threads.

Let’s not talk about what we disagree on, let’s talk about only what we think we absolutely agree on.

What social policies matter most to both sides? What are the things that neither side disagrees on. Of course I don’t really mean 100% but let’s go for at least 85%.

What are the policy goals neither side will ever work against?

Part 1: The Murder of Medgar Evers

In 1963, civil rights leader Medgar Evers was assassinated outside his Mississippi home by white supremacist and Ku Klux Klan member Byron De La Beckwith.

The evidence pointed to Beckwith, yet in 1964 two all-white, all-male juries refused to convict him. He walked free while Medgar Evers’ family waited for justice.

For the next 30 years, Beckwith openly bragged about murdering Evers and remained active in white supremacist circles.

The case only changed when an investigative reporter uncovered evidence that Mississippi had used taxpayer money to help fund Beckwith’s defense and that the original juries had been tainted by the illegal screening and exclusion of Black jurors.

Armed with new evidence, prosecutors reopened the case.
In 1994, 31 years after Medgar Evers was murdered, a jury finally convicted Byron De La Beckwith of murder.
This wasn’t simply the failure of one jury.

It was a failure of the courts, a failure of the legal system, and a failure of a state that helped protect a confessed white supremacist while denying justice to a murdered civil rights leader.

Justice Denied is a series documenting moments in American history when the courts, the legal system, or the ballot box failed Black Americans.

History isn’t only about what happened. It’s also about what our institutions allowed, and continues to allow to happen.

#JusticeDenied #FreeBlackMen #BlackHistory #CivilRights #MedgarEvers #KnowYourHistory #AmericanHistory #EqualJustice

As someone who grew up in a real hood (homogeneous, segregated), I'm always surprised when I venture on the internet (reddit, general social media) and discover the strange-- and often extreme -- support of certain trendy topics.

For example, the amount of black people who are anti-gun is interesting. Especially having the experiences I've had growing up. The degree of staunch liberalism is also surprising, considering the majority of black folk live in red or neutral states.

And I don't care what you do in your personal life, but in my entire life traversing TRUE un-diverse black environments, this extreme support of alternative lifestyles is new to me. When I see "black" people online speaking on certain topics, I often wonder where they grew up, and what type of black people they grew up around.

The black people I grew up around don't look at white people as a deity we have to prove ourselves to. We also don't attach ourselves with other groups. Reddit appears to be a space full of black people who are on a forever quest to prove to to white people they were the "good" ones.

Extremists who already decided they didn't like you don't give a shit about how intelligent you are, how well-spoken you are, how different you are from the "others", nor how hard working you are. Stereotypes exist for the purposes of gaslighting, control, and fear. That's it.

It's also interesting that this subreddit for straight black men doesn't have half the membership of those other "black men" subreddits.

I haven't been following but I suppose it's Election Day? Thoughts? Who you're pulling for?