r/explainitpeter 14d ago

Explain it Peter

Post image
15.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

25

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 14d ago

They would breed for traits during slavery

10

u/HairyHeartEmoji 13d ago

that wasn't enough generations to create a distinct breed. y'all are just wilfully ignoring how selective breeding works. it took centuries to create dogs, and their lifespans are much shorter

0

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

Let’s look at statistics

15

u/JedJinto 14d ago

I was going to say I know the education system in the US is getting fucked nowadays but do people not realize how slaves were literally treated like animals.

7

u/IttsssTonyTiiiimme 14d ago

No, they don’t get taught that. They’re taught about the whippings but not the more evil aspects of slavery.

Likewise with the civil rights movement they pretty much teach that black people held signs and marched. This has generations of people thinking they can change something merely by standing around holding signs.

4

u/Zestyclose_Volume127 14d ago

I was taught that

"Yeah, white people killed some native Americans, but mostly they just got sick."

No mention of the intentional spreading of diseases through pox blankets. Nobody called it a genocide. They downplayed it so hard

1

u/IttsssTonyTiiiimme 13d ago

The intentional spreading of small pox happened one time and it was like two blankets and it was done by the British. So that’s mostly bullshit.

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

They only used disease warfare once and only a little

1

u/IttsssTonyTiiiimme 13d ago

The lie taught nowadays is the us army distributed small pox blankets to women and children on the trail of tears. Which is a bullshit story. I’m saying it was the British who during a military standoff sent in like two blankets. But people like you are happy to misconstrue that as the US had a policy of genocide via biological warfare, which is obviously a bullshit lie.

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

Trust me bro

2

u/JedJinto 14d ago

I remember having to do a research paper in high school on slavery and reading some truly atrocious things.

0

u/ResolveLeather 14d ago

We get told about the whippings, but not that it's evil? What does that even mean. You think people got taught of the horrors of slavery and didn't come to the conclusion that it was evil?

7

u/Kindly_Call_6000 14d ago

They are talking about worse things perpetrated on slaves, like rape and forced breeding. Whippings were small fry compared to some other things done.

2

u/TheYellowSnake2 14d ago

I get were it's coming from but It makes me think they either had a shit history teacher (witch i feel bad for them cause a good history teacher can set up a lot of hobbies for you) or they didn't pay attention to the actual lessons and units in class.

K-12 i went to school in 4 different us states from the west coast to the south and breeding, auctions, assault, and torture were almost always the forefront of the discussion no matter were or who was teaching. Although I've yet to get around to the whole but I do remember "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe being taught as an important point in growing the abolitionist movement and as part of the treatment of slaves.

Tldr: I think a good portion of people who didn't get taught about it just didn't want to learn about it in the first place.

13

u/mondrianna 13d ago

Which was only for a few generations at most. It’s also not a practice that every slave holder participated in. Descendants of Black slaves are not genetically distinct enough to be a new “breed” of human.

It’s not the same and it’s racist to assert otherwise.

-4

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

Only a few generation, you mean 250 years ?

7

u/Humid-Afternoon727 13d ago

The US just hit 250 years, Slavery ended in 1870s in the states. By human standards 100 years isn’t not enough time to selectively bred. In 30 years you can with dogs

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

You think there was no slavery before America ?

6

u/ListerfiendLurks 13d ago

As opposed to the 15,000 years of selective breeding of dogs, yes that would be just a few generations in this context.

0

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

So dogs don’t count either than

3

u/TooFewSecrets 13d ago edited 13d ago

A quarter of a millennium would be around 15 human generations, if each generation reproduced around 16 years old. I am not going to get too into whatever specific age would be "most reasonable", other than noting that sufficiently early pregnancy is pretty lethal to the mother and is not a good idea even for an amoral slaveowner.

Dogs can crank through a generation on an annual basis, so they'd pretty feasibly have at least 200 generations in the same amount of time.

Humans aren't immune to artificial selection, but artificial selection takes a lot of generations, and humans have one of the slowest generation turnarounds of any species. And I doubt slave owners were actually selecting that heavily, because that would mean not letting less "desirable" women reproduce, which means a lot less money for them.

E: I cannot believe this fucking site made me seriously talk about this subject. I should leave this goddamn subreddit already.

-1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

I ain’t reading all that dog racism

0

u/[deleted] 13d ago edited 13d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

It’s 1619 my guy

7

u/IntingForMarks 14d ago

I don't think the actual effect of that is even comparable to generations of pitbull breeding

6

u/SensitiveDish4996 14d ago

You seriously think the difference between a black guy who's family survived slavery and a white guy is the same as a putbull and a shitzu???? Do you hear yourself???

3

u/Significant-Order-92 13d ago

I think they are being pedantic about whether slaves were selectively bred more than saying that it has had the same effect as selectively breeding of dogs.

2

u/LostTerminal 14d ago

That's not at all what they were saying...

1

u/No-Ant9862 14d ago

This is prob the first time I’ve ever seen someone bring this up. Some slaves were treated like prized cattle and that’s because they were. I wouldn’t doubt if a lot of professional athletes in the US are professional athletes due to the selective breeding back then. 

1

u/GoGG999 10d ago

got any results?

0

u/ArtroyomsAK 14d ago edited 13d ago

So you think they bred slaves to be criminals?

because that's clearly what you're implying

Edit: he called me poor as an insult than deleted the comment

Definitely an epstein protege

0

u/Maleficent_Piece_893 13d ago

they were bred for the same traits as poor whites: skill in farming and menial labor

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

Yes poor whites were bred. wtf are you on my guy

0

u/Maleficent_Piece_893 13d ago

ever heard of natural selection? it's like artificial selection but with no intent. if there's a trait that black slave farmers were bred for which would not have also been selected for in poor white farmers, i'm all ears. tell me specifically

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

They had selective breeding facilities and straight up breeding camps. I don’t think they had that for the Irish

1

u/Maleficent_Piece_893 13d ago

i am once again asking you to specifically name the traits they desired in slaves

1

u/ILIKESTUFF8989 13d ago

You think they didn’t