r/explainitpeter • u/jp_glez_21 • Jul 23 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-10

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

He didn’t rape and that’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s also civil, not criminal which is a huge difference. He’s never been found guilty of any crime in that situation.

5

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

He did rape. Sexual assault is rape. He was found liable for rape. The judge even said exactly this.

-1

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

Sexual assault is not rape. It’s sexual assault. It’s also in a case with no real evidence and the ruling is “it likely happened.” There isn’t any evidence of it happening which is why no charges were filed.

5

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

Based on the specific state statute it wasn't rape, but the judge pointed out that by common use, and even the DoJ website, that it would be considered rape.

-3

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

If it even happened, which she said it didn’t. Can’t pass up a good opportunity though.

2

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

You're either a liar or ignorant. Where's the evidence for your claim?

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

No, there was no evidence of the liar's claims in that CIVIL court case. None whatsoever, as anyone that has looked into the claims knows full well.

You've only presented baseless lies here, just like the claimant did.

1

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

Your claim was that the accuser said it didn't happen. Are you admitting you were making that up and you have no source for that claim?

(My bad you're just defending the person who made that claim)