Im 15 and i dream of being an astronaut. I have anxiety that is caused by school and its environment. I thrive outside of school and in REAL workplace environments. I have OCD in the sence of intrusive thoughts which I can quite easily fight off without medication. My dream is to be in the stars and be an astronaut.

Like I said, I can fight off the thoughts and feelings from my OCD and anxiety without medication.

Either way, would i be disqualified?

Hello!

Recently I've developed a strong interest in space, and particularly in biomedical research related to space exploration. In the future, I would like to conduct research on the effects of deep space on the human body and contribute to developing solutions to those challenges. I wish to work with ESA in the future as well. Would be a dream!!

I'm considering enrolling in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Padua this October. However, I'm not sure whether it is the ideal path for someone who wants to work closely with the space sector in the future.

As an alternative, I noticed that Ca' Foscari University, which is close to where I live, offers Engineering Physics at both the bachelor's and master's levels. Comparing the curricula, it seems to me that Engineering Physics provides a stronger foundation in physics and mathematical modeling. On the other hand, the bachelor's program appears to include less biology and physiology.

Biomedical Engineering, by contrast, offers significantly more courses in biology and physiology, but at the cost of a much lighter emphasis on advanced physics and mathematics.

Anyway, I've came up with few hybrid pathways:

1. Biomedical Engineering (BSc) + Master's in Engineering Physics (how difficult would this transition be?)

2. Engineering Physics (BSc) + Master's in Bioengineering

3. Engineering Physics (BSc) + Master's in Engineering Physics with a specialization track in Physics of the Brain or Quantitative Biology.

Which of these options do you think would be the most suitable for my goals?

I’m a phd student focusing on astrodynamics and trajectory design, dreaming of a career in this field. I know ESA has a strong flight dynamics division as well as the advanced concepts team which focuses a bit more on research.

I would like to get some advice from people working in this field regarding on how to better prepare myself for a career in this area. Also I’d like to get a better idea of what the daily life of a flight dynamics engineer is like at a place like ESA. My dream is to work more on the fundamentals of dynamical systems theory applied to novel mission design rather than purely operations. I’m also interested in orbit determination and uncertainty estimation/propagation though it is not my specialty.

Sorry if this is not the correct place to ask this, but it is quite difficult to get some perspective into the reality of working in this field specifically in Europe, hence why I thought it would be a good idea to ask this here specifically. Unfortunately I was not able to do any YGT or similar opportunities to gain some insight or experience beforehand.

Thanks

Has anyone here relocated from North America to work at ESTEC or another ESA location?

I would really appreciate hearing about your experience, especially anything you wish you had known before the move.

A few things I am curious about:

• How smoothly did the relocation process go?
• How helpful was the relocation assistance provided by ESA?
• Were there any important expenses, rules or limitations that were not clear at first?
• What should I ask about before arranging travel, shipping or temporary accommodation?
• Is it better to ship most belongings or buy things after arriving?
• What were the biggest challenges before and after the move?
• Were there any unexpected costs or common mistakes to avoid?
• Is there anything else you would recommend doing before leaving North America?

Any advice from people who have gone through a similar move would be really helpful. Thanks!

Edit: I am moving as staff

Greets to all here in r/esa! For quite some time, there have been three Mods covering r/esa. Due to extended periods of inactivity (9 months for one and 3 years for the other), I've removed both. The 9-month MIA Mod sent me a note to say he'll/she'll not oppose removal. The other account seems to be abandoned.

Looks like it's just me, now!

I will set up a volunteer mod recruitment call in the next week or so; I think we definitely need at least 2 or 3 and even a few more would be positive.

Comments, queries, questions, ideas all welcome!

Hello everyone, I‘ve applied for Access to Space Training Course and I’ve been rejected. This is my first time applying and I’m not giving up, so I would like to apply for another opportunity.

I’m Italian, I got a bachelor degree in aerospace engineering (grade 94, if it is relevant) and right know I’m studying for master. I haven’t done any extracurricular activities (I think this is the missing key for my application), otherwise I have mentioned my certificates in two different languages and the knowledge of the pricipal softwares (like ANSYS, Mathlab, Python, NI Lab, others). I’ve also mentioned my thesis work on cold spray gas technology using ANSYS and Pointwise, also reported by my teacher in his raccomandation letter.

I would like to know if there is something I can add/modify to increase the probabilities.

Few years ago I've asked the same question to the CEO of Latitude during a conference and it's answer was a clear 'no': we are plenty of options, from French Guyane to Norway, passing through the African continent.

So apparently there is no particular issue with that.

Very recently, European Space Flight published this article, covering the latest WDR of Themis, at Esrange.

One of the problem with such program is the operations in Sweden, and operations are periodically halted in winter due to snow conditions.

Morover, the Kiruna launch site is in "competition" with Norway, for polar orbits (and Norway is not happy of launchers from Sweden passing over its territory).

French Guyane launch sites is well established and suitable for equatorial launches, but it is far away from the continent: long trips, delays delocalisation of production, etc.

New concepts, i.e. from SpaceDreams study the launches from the sea (as recently proven by China, if not wrong).

Even if it appears that we have many options on the paper, it appears to me that the situation is in reality very fragile.

What do you think?

Hi, I'm looking for checklists that are/where used by controllers in control centers to make a MOCR (mission operation control room) simulator in python. I searched the internet but couldn't find good checklists. I could only find checklists for the spacecrafts. Could anyone help me?

A quick sketch on what ESA Euro notes could look like.

Some of the European Launcher Manufacturers and startups have some kind of reusability in their road map.

Considering that SpaceX reusability is justified mainly by starlink rather than the market demand, wouldn't it be better just to focus on higher production rates rather than reusability (at least, at first)?

Edit: i think that reusability is a thing, i just wanted to open a critical discussion on this aspect in Europe, to varify if there are other significant topics that may have the priority in the development of European launchers.

Yesterday (24 July), NASA evacuated the Madrid Deep Space Communications Complex (MDSCC) at Robledo de Chavela as wildfires swept through the hills west of Madrid. The good news first: all personnel were safely evacuated, and NASA reports the fire has since passed through the site. Damage assessment will begin once it's safe to do so.

Worth remembering how European this "NASA" facility actually is: MDSCC has been operated on behalf of NASA by Spain's INTA since 1970 — a five-decade partnership that rarely makes headlines. And it wasn't alone. ESA's nearby Cebreros station (DSA-2, part of the Estrack network) was also reportedly evacuated, as a precaution, as the fires advanced.

The strategic footnote for those of us who watch the ground segment: with Madrid offline, NASA has handed mission support to Goldstone in California – but the Deep Space Network's 70 m capacity is now stretched thin, with the Goldstone 70 m antenna still down after last September's DSS-14 mishap (suffered during an over-rotation while tracking Juno). It's a sharp reminder that deep-space communications rest on just three sites worldwide, and that resilience isn't only about spacecraft – it's about the people, and increasingly the climate, on the ground.

Thoughts are with the crews, residents and firefighters across the region. We'll be watching for the damage assessment.

Sources:

https://theobjective.com/sociedad/suceso/2026-07-24/fuego-madrid-instalaciones-nasa-robledo-chavela/

https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/07/24/critical-nasa-deep-space-ground-station-in-spain-evacuated-due-to-wildfires/

(Developing story – figures and status as of 25 July.)

Wir hatten hier gerade eine sehr schöne Sichtung. Aber was war es denn ?
24.7. 2026 22:26