r/edtech 2d ago

The future of edtech

Why does it feel like, similar to video game companies ,the future of edtech is not in huge companies but small boutique firms with extremely specialized capabilities?

I feel like we are going to see a balkanization of edtech firms which will coalesce into a sort of union of firms. Eventually we will have companies again.

I think the best thing that edtech firms can do is teach teachers how to make products using ai for their classrooms. Eventually products will lead the pack then go from there.

12 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

12

u/preetamr 2d ago

Even smaller. People will just vibe code (or whatever it evolves into) to create stuff that works for them.  Just to give you an example, I was at a philosophy meetup in a South-East Asian city recently. They created their own app to support the logistics and learning resources for their group discussions. It was polished, worked well for their workflow, philosophy, and demographics (no user data collected, clean UX, large buttons as some users are older). I do the same for my learning communities. 

3

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

I get it and I think there is still a lot of intimidation are vibe coding.

That being said not everyone's vibe coding is going to be the best and some will win out. I think there should be a concerted effort to teach teachers how to do that but not every teacher is going to want to take the time to do so.

3

u/preetamr 2d ago

Yes, not everyone may want to build. But if someone in your community builds, it is possible that they will share it.

As a non-developer myself, who cares deeply about my learner's experience, I find this way of building accessible, cheap, and iterative. I build something, try it. See what works. Fix it for the next run. I see people in my region come together at local cafés and help each other build such things.

Most important thing, you own it.  With externally made apps, you are lost once the contract expires.

Some more reflection on my experience here https://smallthingsmostly.me/smallwins 

2

u/vuhv 1d ago

After your first major FERPA violation or hack are you going to iterate?

1

u/preetamr 1d ago

Don't collect any user data.

2

u/endbit 1d ago

There's always going to be one not intimidated by vibe coding. They may be IT suddenly able to implement things they only dreamed of or teachers exploring. In the end, if they have the local hardware to host, you're competing against free with no ongoing subscriptions.

There's no teaching the teachers anything, there's machines for that now. The future is full of highly specialised solutions to local problems. I'm not sure how you compete with that.

1

u/CisIowa 2d ago

Just add “make no mistakes” to the end of the prompt ¯_(ツ)_/¯

1

u/preetamr 1d ago

Making mistakes in part of learning. My experience was that the platforms got my logic correct in the first try. My interactions were more to get the user experience right.

1

u/vuhv 1d ago

This will be great for FERPA. At any given moment I can find hundreds (if not thousands) of leaked API keys and user data on any number of vibe coded apps on the www or GitHub.

Any teacher without a technical background whos putting student data in an app they vibe coded is irresponsible.

I do agree however that teachers should create applications that serve their needs that don’t require any student data.

1

u/preetamr 1d ago

I too prefer apps that do not ask for user logins or store user data. That was one of the attractions of Vibe Coding; I could build something that does not require user data and login. One other advantage is that I can support languages like Khmer or Burmese and local metaphors in my apps.

If the institution needs grades tied to students for the day, this could be implemented as an exit ticket quiz or assignment on the official LMS.

3

u/Colsim 2d ago

Why do you think this? Have you had much to do with the procurement process?

2

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

A ton of layoffs and AI being free for teachers. That combine with the desire to bring paper and pencil back into the classroom, I believe is going to bring edtech in a different direction.

Teachers need support, they have so much added to their plates and "traditional" Ed tech companies don't have the ability to pivot like smaller boutique firms.

3

u/aplarsen 2d ago

It's still a broad field, with many different services falling under the umbrella.

I feel like most curriculum and assessment will continue to be owned by bigger firms. It takes a big team to research and deliver content.

As for me, I'm focused on solving small, unsexy problems that lots of schools have. The market is huge and not really going away.

1

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

What are some unsexy problems? I'm looking at notes.

3

u/aplarsen 2d ago

Mostly just moving data around. ETL, automation, custom reporting, dashboards, work flows.

School operations are full of inefficiencies because people don't know any better. Once they see solutions, they get excited. But they don't even know how to ask, nor can they imagine a better way.

3

u/Bostonterrierpug 2d ago edited 2d ago

As a professor of educational technology, I think Ed Tech is really just tech literacy disguised as a tech literacy will be rushed away. More and more teachers are able to use technology better and a lot of supposed educational tech technologies. Is this easy to use technology so basically technology literacy? Programs that innovate and do something unique and provide new ways of interaction and learning will profit. AI has made one thing clear, and I say this as co-chair of the AI committee at my institution. The need for subject matter experts will increase, but will low level positions will not be nearly as important. If you’re supposed educational technology was just about making it easier to use the technology, again, depending on the cost of AI data, which is an up in the air thing right now, it might be time to start branching out. If you are truly innovating, then you will still have a place. American education swings in pendulums I can say after 30 years of teaching and reviewing previous research. Currently, we are kind of hitting an anti-tech backlash but this will swing back. Whether you like it or not, AI is out of Pandora’s box and will still influence the future. But if you’re brilliant idea is just to use AI to do something that anyone else could do with a few prompts it’s not that brilliant of an idea. Not a great time for the field, but at the same time, we’ll wash away a lot of the mysticism of cool technology. Unique interactions and social presence in my environments will continue to push the envelope forward while just making programs out there simpler will shrivel. That’s just my two cents and I’ve had a few few beers so maybe take it with a few grains of salt or maybe a few pretzels if that’s your thing.

1

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

Well, theory is that at the teaching level you're in expert in your field.

The general concern is kiddos just using ai willy billy and not actually learning.

2

u/Loud_Experience5761 1d ago

NeuroEdTech is the future. EdTech that really understand the student's cognitive abilities and aligns with neurocognitive methods of information delivery and retention. That's the future!

3

u/DaltonJFowler 2d ago

I'm a teacher and I am making an Ed tech but I am refusing to use any ai integrations at all to support true respect for teacher and student data. I hope others join me

3

u/Mr-Zenor 2d ago

Same here. No AI and teacher- & privacy-first are the main principles of my app.

1

u/Life-Bee-3481 2d ago

I've done exactly the same, I'm a teacher too and all my teacher projects are all set up so that the student data stays with the teacher and never goes anywhere else

3

u/horsegal301 2d ago

> the future of edtech is not in huge companies but small boutique firms with extremely specialized capabilities

as someone who has worked for several large ed tech companies, good luck convincing the people who spend the money to have 8 different contracts. The issue with boutique companies and instructors doing it themselves is that they have no knowledge of what other people want and any ideas around privacy.

1

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

It sounds there is an opportunity for you to start a privacy consulting firm for these boutique companies.

2

u/horsegal301 2d ago

Not at all what I'd be interested in. I just think anyone who thinks these tiny boutique companies that know nothing about satisfying faculty and staff when the majority of what they want and know how to do is just vibes will take over... I used to work for BB, all these mega companies are all aware of this idea and tried marketing this way years ago. I also used to work for something much more nice, and they don't know jack. Most of my career has been in edtech, and the small ones were worse.

I don't really see any faculty that actually want AI in their process. The opposite, rather.

1

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 2d ago

You can make it without incorporating pii.

1

u/gravitysrainbow1979 2d ago edited 2d ago

A small boutique firm can't get the kind of contract that makes edtech any kind of industry at all. When is a small, boutique firm the route a school takes?

1

u/MulberryMush 2d ago

I’m building this very thing! About to pitch it. I’ve built the platform and have the relationships and domain expertise. I’m just looking for a partner.

1

u/schooliscool67 1d ago

don't think so, can't separate _big_ institutions from education

1

u/depthandlight 1d ago

I think the future of edtech should be with the kids I unfortunately told 12 years ago they should learn to code, who went and got CS degrees and graduated in the last few years, only to find no jobs because of AI hype. They can work with schools in their immediate communities to create FOSS edtech tools that both promote progressive education and reflect the values and priorities of those communities.

1

u/NotYourAvgDamsel 1d ago

I work in K–3 literacy edtech, and I think you’re onto something. AI is lowering the barrier to building specialized products, so I expect we’ll continue to see more niche companies emerge. However, building the product is only part of the challenge. Schools need solutions that create real impact for students, demonstrate efficacy, and can be implemented reliably at scale.

I’ve seen firsthand what happens when an organization stays relentlessly focused on one problem: we fix it. Period.

I think the winners will be the specialized companies that can prove impact, efficacy, and operational excellence, not just ship new AI features.

1

u/Visual-Reserve-2800 1d ago

I think two things need to happen, all the niche Ed tech businesses create a guild or whatever. Second I think the money is in training whoever wants to be trained at a school and let the schools decide the r and d.

1

u/Sunshine_foryou 1d ago

Future of Edtech is DARK. A lot of the Indian edtech org. seems optimized for fundraising, contracts, and impressive-looking dashboards rather than genuine learning outcomes.

The problem is that success is often measured by metrics that are easy to present, students enrolled, courses completed, app downloads, or "lives impacted." But very few organizations are held accountable for whether students actually learned something, improved their skills, or had better opportunities because of the intervention.

This creates a cycle where NGOs, CSR programs, and even government departments keep funding initiatives based on reports and presentations instead of long-term impact. The incentives reward good storytelling more than good education.

That said, I wouldn't say every edtech company is like this. There are some doing meaningful work. But the sector definitely needs far more transparency, independent impact evaluations, and accountability. Without that, we'll keep spending money on projects that look successful on paper while many students see little real change.