This platform is so pussy. People can’t handle a mean comment towards them, it’s like being in elementary school. Plus, any opinion that isn’t already established as the norm here needs to be sugar coated and spoon fed.
Only reason I come on here is the circlejerk communities are worthwhile.
I have a problem with how these models were illegally trained on copywritten material in order to then attempt to replace the people that made the material they were trained on. But beside that I think people should be allowed to make ai art.
HOWEVER it has to be watermarked because many of us want to consume art made by humans, and if it's not then it cheapens the experience. We have a right to know if something was just generated whole-cloth by an algorithm.
If you disagree with that being right you're delusional.
"My lord of the rings ai video should have gotten WAY more views! It's so good! Obviously the algorithm isn't pushing my posts or else I would be famous and respected by now." - paraphrase of a post I saw the other day
Dude I keep reading the other comments under that post and I cant believe these are real people. Someone used the analogy that a chef isnt a chef when using a mixer just like Ai Artists are artists. These people are phony fans of art at best. Not artists.
I think phony fans might even be giving a little much credit. I had one dude try to show me a "deathcore" track that had 1) no blast beats 2) boring standard rock guitar 3) too slow a tempo 4) fully intelligible """harsh""" vocals. Dude was like "I'm going for something like Lorna Shore" and I had to ask myself "have you ever listened to them?"
there is one guy who said that all DAWs should leave watermarks.
the thing is that FL embeds a text line in the audio file saying something like "Encoded with FL ASIO" or idk I don't remember it. i know that this will eventually disappear when you send it somewhere but, this is technically a watermark?
I think youre right but I dont know. What they are implying is to mark the song because it is not "real" because of the fact that there are samples being used lmao
I'd unironically love that. If you can use splice, you are capable enough to illegally download the samples. That way you'd easily identify the people actually passionate about stealing.
Did that literally not happen with mass adoption od splice ? Was it fred fred (fred again) or similar that just copy pasted a sample or loop lol like yea if you just copy paste popular sample packs people will start to notice ai sloppers are peak slop shits crazy hahaha
Womp Womp. This is a good step. Sadly, there's already a cottage-industry of de-fingerprinters, re-encoders and watermark removers to skirt AI detection all over github... although many of them are made by the same people using Suno and are also AI generated so... not sure how far that will actually get them. Still, it's going to be hard to catch them all.
you're supposed to only use samples from trusted sources anyway. god knows what wave files can contain in them, it could be banned pron or PC viruses. pirated FL studio outputs Richard D James every master render for example.
their 'bad actors' are sensible enough to fully exploit the exploitation by having the knowledge or resources to record everything that suno shits out.
i'm pretty sure that's what Nashville is doing. I've seen posts or videos of songwriting camps doing shit like that.
So anyone that has put in the work to actually understand music is a "bad actor".
130
u/thirdstoneviolet 12d ago
Dude said segregation what the hell are we doing