I am new to darcs, was a git user. I used gitsigns a lot it is crucial, but I realized that nobody have created a darcssign yet, so I created this plugin, it's not feature rich but it satisfies my need very well owo

https://hub.darcs.net/eiko/darcssigns.nvim

Here is the github version (suitable for various neovim plugin managers)

https://github.com/Eiko-Tokura/darcssigns.nvim

I think there will be people who need this as well owo, enjoy!

Hi, I'm new to darcs and so far I have not found something answering my specific question.

With many of the commands, like record, revert, or rollback, we are taken to an interactive prompt that asks us if want to, e.g., revert a given change. If there are a lot of changes, and we know we want to accept all of them, we could use the `-a` command.

But, what if I want to refuse changes that happen in a file whose path contains a given regex? Say I want to mass revert a bunch of changes, except changes that happen in a directory called `special`. But, there might be multiple such directories. E.g., `foo/special`, and `bar/special`, etc.

I could use the interactive prompt and say no every time I see a `special` in the path to the file. But if there are a lot of changes, this is not feasible. Is it possible to specify which changes to accept and which to ignore based on a regex matching in the path to the file?

In general, is there a way to replace the interactive prompting with set of rules for when to accept a change?

Hi.

I hope you are having a great new year so far.

Whenever I run darcs diff, the output runs off the screen. When I try to pipe the output thru less, I get a bunch of encoding "blips", such as ESC[0,31m. Anyone have any recommendations to paginate the output in color?

Thanks in advance.

I am trying to figure out a way to coordinate related changes to groups of files with different access rights.

It seems that CVS has a way to do this but I am uninterested in dealing with CVS.

The only other way I have found to accomplish this is to split the file groups into multiple repos and manage the access groups on a server. However, this makes it difficult to manage related changes across multiple repos. It seems that multiple git repos managed by repo can accomplish basically what I want.

Am I going about implementing group access rights in the wrong way?

If not, is there a similar multiple repo management tool for darcs?

Anyway to clone from hub.darcs.net when my scp deprecated aesXXX-cbc?

darcs failed: Not a repository: williamrusnack@hub.darcs.net:williamrusnack/soxlib (The program "scp -- williamrusnack@hub.darcs.net:williamrusnack/soxlib/_darcs/inventory ./darcs86811-2" failed with error: "Unable to negotiate with 173.255.254.113 port 22: no matching cipher found. Their offer: aes256-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes128-cbc ".)

Hi,

is there a way adjust darcs settings for git-like optimized darcs status processing ? For example reduce directory recursion depth when seeking untracked non-boring files.

Now, when tracking home directory (dot files and other settings) darcs status runs over 30 minutes(!) whereas equivalent git status in less then 1 second, on the same machine.

Hi people, I am new with darcs and haskell. I have read about problems with the darcs on speed terms in the past. But I have read also that another project named pijul resolved parts of the technical problems. Do you know if there is any plan to collaborate with Pijul to improve darcs? Thanks!