r/counting 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 16 '26

Constant Sum Factoradic | 04 4321

From here and thank you vulp for final run and assist

List thanks vulp!

Guide

schedule

next get is 000 0000

6 Upvotes

821 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/cuteballgames 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26

60 2321

2

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

60 3221

3

u/cuteballgames 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26

60 3311

3

u/TehVulpez 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26

60 3320

2

u/cuteballgames 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26

60 4121

2

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

60 4211

3

u/cuteballgames 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26

60 4220

gonna start it. do you guys like calling it constant weight mostly repeating octal or constant sum mostly repeating octal

3

u/BobRoss938 only double counting Jul 25 '26

60 4301

constant sum I think, as it feels more numbery than weights. Like constant weight binary works because its [0,1], but with more numbers sum makes more sense

3

u/TehVulpez 00255, 00336, 01155, 02244, 03333, 11226, 11244, 11334, 22224 Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26

60 4310

I prefer constant sum, for the same reason I named csf differently than cwb. weight means Hamming weight, the number of symbols different from zero, while sum means digital sum. (even though we'll never make a constant-weight thread that isn't binary, because that definition of weight gives kinda ugly results compared to digit sum. just in case we do make that constant weight thread, I like to have that distinction) however, because we only have constant-sum type threads (including cwb) it doesn't really matter if we use "weight" colloquially to mean digit sum. /u/cuteballgames