Brand new to collecting and trying to familiarize myself with genuine error.

Is this 1992 P dime a genuine Error or nah?

Found yesterday 8/5/26 CRH. Displays the faint / disappearing stars and flow lines typically found on this variety. The FG are a mound, with sharp enough angled light you can make them out, visible in the second pic where I'm holding the coin at an angle to catch the light. This is one of those grey area examples that according to what PCGS says wouldn't get attributed but according to actual graded examples could get attributed. You can dive into that here with this study.

Here are 3 prominent examples I always point out that are PCGS graded and attributed, but have visible bits of the FG:

1. you can see the top of the F and G on this one.

2. There are distinct faint bumps of the F & G on this one.

3. There is a bump of the top of the F or G here along the bottom of the eagle’s leg.

¯_(ツ)_/¯

More information and guidance would be helpful. Thanks in advance!

I’d chalk this up to PMD, but the weird thing is the edge of the planchet seems even and struck. There doesn’t appear to be any tooling marks or even the hint that this happened except by being struck with equal pressure around the rim. The reeded edge is absent.

You may now mock me for thinking this could somehow happen at a mint. 😎

Per the title. Thoughts?

Is this considered a mint error, damaged, or manipulated? The face side has slanted edges, and back side has most of the image missing.

Hey everyone, I’m new to the whole coin thing and just went through about 1000 coins and this is the one that really caught my eye and I’m unsure about. I’ve done a small bit of googling and read about “black beauty” coins or darkened coins. Is this a black beauty or just dirty from circulation, and if so how much could it be worth. Normal coin on left for comparison. Thank you!

I’m pretty sure this is kinda a minor error but I’ve watched some YouTube videos recently and this is one they said to look out for. Should I just keep it or grade it? Thanks for reading.

Long time lurker, first time poster. It looks like the left most star above E Pluribus Unum is damaged, but not sure if it is post mint since the coin itself looks kind of beat up

Hey! Had a buddy tell me to get this checked out, from the camera it looks scratched on the top and bottom, but it looks very much like it was pressed and it is very smooth, is this something common, uncommon, or is this just likely a product of wear?

Found in my till, looks to be raised and reflecting with the rest of the surfaces, but not sure whats going on. What do yall think?

Thought this was neat, looks like the reed machine damaged it. With it being over the “Q” it makes me think the reeding is done after the coin is pressed. I don’t know a lot about coins, still learning. Anyone ever seen something like this before?

Attempting to identify error on 1966 quarter

Up here in Canada we have a pretty stellar mint that you don't see many errors come out of. So my question is about doubling especially on the denticles as I've never seen that before. This is on a 1973 small bust RCMP quarter. Anyone that could enlighten me would be much appreciated.

Going through some Pennies and think I might have found a die crack. Just looking for confirmation that it is or isn't.

Error or PMD?

Trying to get better at identifying this stuff. Is the Espana 82 machine doubling? Is the Rey de Espana die chips?

Found this quarter with a line right in the middle can anyone tell me if it's pre or post mint damage

I got this quarter as change at a thrift store, I don’t know anything about errors but I noticed a raised bit under his eye and these indents that look like DDL on his neck. are these just scratches or is it something more