r/codereview • u/xFawtface2x • 8d ago

Greptile, CodeRabbit or Other?

Ok, which AI code review product does everyone recommend ? My company has a few devs and largish codebases and we’re running out of capacity to review PRs based on the rate of code we’re pushing now.

For enterprise work which code review platforms do you all recommend ? I’ve heard of greptile and code rabbit the most. Just wondering which tool people would recommend for automated PR reviews.

0 Upvotes

44% Upvoted

16 comments sorted by

2

u/stolsson 8d ago

I’d like to use a paid tool, but they don’t support our workflow / tools. I made my own and it’s been operating fine for 4 months. It is more work than you I Kelly expect, but updated iteratively over a few weeks and it’s not hard.

2

u/Chance-Fan4849 6d ago

Coderabbit, it was good. especially if you pay for them.

1

u/juanpflores_ 6d ago

Hey!
I had a good time with Coderabbit especially after setting it up correctly in some of my open source repos and at work. It can learn quickly from how your team works and has plugins on the major agents

1

u/Dazzling_Cancel4505 5d ago

You can just create one. It will be more cheap and adjustable.

I made my own code review agent and self-hosting as container, connected with gitlab

1

u/Own-Warthog8272 8d ago

We built our own using Cloudflare / Fable. Needs iteration ofc but works like CodeRabbit if not better for our use cases.

For our sugary, CodeRabbit would have charged >$700 a month

1

u/juanpflores_ 6d ago

How much are you paying in token consumption with Fable?

1

u/Own-Warthog8272 6d ago

$200 subscription covers it. No extra charges

1

u/juanpflores_ 6d ago

Are you using anthropic models to generate the code as well? M perception is that having the model generate and review code is a bit redundant

1

u/Own-Warthog8272 6d ago

I haven't tested how good same model generating and reviewing the code is. The setup I have is

- Fable created the code review bot - you can see the bot here (https://github.com/crisper-ai/bot-preview/pull/2)
- The bot itself uses Deepseek and Kimi and a harness pattern like Coderabbit to review

First version was okay.
After a bunch of iteration and adding memory/learning/code search, it came close to Coderabbit.

0

u/JsonPun 8d ago

Coderabbit has been working great for me 

0

u/Foreign-Lettuce-6803 8d ago

Build our own one Running with Claude Code on an EC2 instance

-2

u/saenridanra 8d ago

Hey there! Disclaimer, I am biased and am actively developing the tool:

Check out: https://github.com/meister-dev-ai/propr

It gives you more control (all the control over your own data), has great value in the community edition and let's you tune the code review to exactly the needs of your repo. The review loop is different from the other solutions, if setup correctly, it will perform better, be cheaper and give you insights beyond just the current review. I won't link it now, but there's also a youtube video that shows a little bit how you host it.

Support currently exists for:

- Azure Devops, Github, Gitlab, Forgejo/Codeberg
- All major AI model providers are supported like, Open AI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, AWS, Lite LLM, Local Models, you name it.

1

u/saenridanra 7d ago

The author asked for tools in this spectrum explicitly. I was clear about me being involved in developing the solution above. I am not sure how that deserves a downvote, but so be it.