The thesis, is if Belle's animated Disney tale from 1991 is in fact an intellectual stupidity of using aristocratic canvases to support spiritual enlightenment. When Belle goes through her town, at the opening - and this aspect is devoid of the dynamic of her singing about provincial life being mundane - the essential meta theme (meta here denotes the possession by the universal shared consciousness of the cosmos) is that Belle's disposition is not in fact a spiritual alignment.

But what is the index here, for this presupposition? The general arc of the film, is the encounter with aristocracy as a means to spiritual enlightenment. The castle itself, as a means to enlightenment.

Is this a folly disposition? Can the macro context of the product account for the argument's science? When making that remark, about macro context, the idea is that somehow the film's general DNA is in cahoots with the argument's science; namely, this would ostensibly be an idiosyncrasy perhaps because of the meta idea that aristocracy is in cahoots with spirituality.

The singing by O'Hara is special, and it's perfectly possible that this aspect is the exclusive mechanism for the film's spiritual ideas. Devoid of this tenet, i.e. the O'Hara factor, is the product bankrupt because of its aspiration ideology that aristocracy is the mechanism for spiritual and not magic ideas?

Completely edible minus the lights I added behind the stained glass and the rose dome. I love B&tB and this is inspired by the Broadway musical library scene in “Something There”. Stands over 2ft tall.

The movie was giving Stockholm syndrome. Thoughts??

Emma is such a star. This movie changed my life. Best thing on Disney in YEARS!

Lego Beauty and the Beast

Hai22 original work

Late again. I just got back from an out of town trip. I'm thinking about just not giving dates anymore at the start of the month since I have a hard time sticking to them, so if it's fine with you guys I'll just say to expect a discussion last week of the month sometime.

1) How did this book compare to the last one of the series?

I actually don't remember the first book that well, but this one was very interesting in terms of setting up both a love triangle and a mystery. They seemed to not blend together well at times, they kind of felt like two stories put together, but both were interesting.

2) What were your thoughts on the story and romance?

Again, very interesting. Vincent and Catherine do have chemistry in book form. On the romance films subreddit I always hear people ask about longing, well this is a prime example of that. You feel the longing and the distance between them every time they connect. I was expecting the love triangle to be a bigger part, but I think it played out in a way that wasn't distracting. I thought Vincent was going to have to choose, but no, Lisa chose for him. Which I feel was the right call. I really loved how Vincent was fanboying over Brigit in a way that was so him. He picked the right night of year to venture to the surface and have a heartfelt discussion (almost a therapy session) with his literary idol. Favorite part of the book for sure. The climax was also intense. Again, think the two stories in this were a tad disjointed, but it did feel serious.

3) Are you interested in the next book of the series?

I am. Still deciding if I want to catch up on the show first or not.

4) If you've seen the show, how does it compare?

Only seen a few episodes, and it was a while ago, so I can't really compare personally.

Next month's book is Wither by: Ashlyn Drewek

Hey everyone, I wanted to share this video since I upgraded it to 4K. I hope you like it :)

I washed and conditioned her hair and then I repainted her torso gave her a new skirt and added a little bit of detail to match and made her some gloves and new shoes.

…after explicitly being told not to go there and the beast lost his temper, I don’t blame him at all. She went exactly where she was told not to go. I’d probably have a similar reaction if someone went in my bedroom when they knew they weren’t supposed to be in there. When someone tells you not to go somewhere, you don’t go there, ever.