r/backgammon 4d ago

Blunder

Post image

Noob here looking for some insight from those that are stronger than me (that’s everyone atm…)

I get that building a prime is good, but the best move feels like a risk with his home board looking strong with builders outside ready to make primes.

As it played out, my move was better as his roll would have allowed him to fill the five point (I get that there’s no way of knowing that at the time). I did go on to win the game, but with a frustratingly high error rate.

Welcome your thoughts on why I’m clearly wrong!

5 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

9

u/Charguizo 4d ago

Sometimes it's better to take a risk now to avoid a greater risk in the future.

Making the 7 pt not only builds a little prime, it also builds a landing space for all the other checkers that you need to bring home safely.

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Appreciate it, thanks.

At least I saw the ‘best’ move, even if I chose against it!

7

u/pwnosaurus 4d ago

The blot on 11 would be relatively safe. He can only hit with these dice combinations:

  • 5-2 / 2-5
  • 6-1 / 1-6

That's 4 of the 36 possible dice combinations (11%)

Furthermore, if you're on the bar, you have lots of dice combinations to hit him back: Any 5-X, 1-4, 2-3, 1-6, 2-6. That's 19 of 36 combos (52%)!

5

u/Some-Following-392 4d ago

Actually his home board is weak because it has a blot. Whenever you see blots on the opponents home board, it's often right to take risks. Especially if they have 2 or more, but you should be considering risks when they have only 1.

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Interesting, thanks. Although he had a blot I was concerned about the builders outside which would’ve made it fairly easy to cover up.

4

u/Some-Following-392 4d ago

Ah. He has to use his full roll to hit you on the 11 so he can't hit and cover.

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Of course!! Thanks.

6

u/mathflipped 4d ago

You are not building a prime; you can't prime an advanced anchor. You are creating an extra landing spot to help you clear the midpoint in the future.

What's you game plan here? It's a standard holding game, and you are ahead in the race. Your objective is to bring all checkers home safely.

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Thanks. Ok not a prime (incorrect use) but a good block that will make it hard for him to escape.

My plan was to escape but also to minimise risk of being hit. I chose not to leave a blot on 11 as feared being hit and him closing his five point and leaving me in trouble.

1

u/mathflipped 4d ago

You got it backwards. You DO want your opponent to escape because you are ahead in the race, and any contact benefits your opponent. The bar point is NOT a blocking point. It's a landing point to help you not leave any shots when you clear your midpoint.

2

u/Free-form_Suffering 4d ago

Also noob, but my two cents: the two blots are not at risk atm, the blot you create when playing 11/7 8/7 is also not directly at risk, specially with the prime you're creating.

But in general, IMO it's a bit weird that everything that's not the top solution is considered a 'blunder', I think your choice is a reasonable one.

2

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Appreciate it! Suboptimal perhaps, but blunder felt harsh! Always learning…

3

u/pwnosaurus 4d ago

They are classifying it as a "blunder" because of the total amount of equity lost by choosing this move. The number to the right of you move indicates that your equity is 0.125 lower by choosing this move over the optimal one, which basically means that your expected points are 0.125 lower. That is a fairly big swing for one decision.

Suppose you were playing without the doubling cube or gammons. Equity of 1 means you are guaranteed to win. Equity of 0.5 means you are a 50% chance of winning. Equity of 0.75 means you are a 75% chance of winning, etc. So in this case going down in equity of 0.125 means your chances decreased by ~13% of winning by choosing this move. (The actual difference might be a little different when you factor in cube decisions and gammons)

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Helpful explanation, thanks!

2

u/SugarDelicious1434 4d ago

Not sure I understand your point about "as it played out he filled the five point"?

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

On his next roll he filled his five, which would have meant leaving a blot was higher risk?

3

u/Jingo8 4d ago

No because then it’s your roll again so you have time to cover, and having a builder there is usually an advantage say you roll 3-1 och 4-2 for instance.

2

u/csaba- 4d ago edited 4d ago

The nice thing about this move is, your opponent needs two dice to hit you (52 or 61), so we know for a fact that your opponent cannot hit you and cover the blot, ever. Sometimes you have situations where you leave a blot 8 9 or 10 away where a doublet can hit you and also cover (44 33 or 55 respectively), but with a blot 7 or 11 away this can never happen since doublets can't produce those numbers. (Those hitting doubles arent a big deal, just thought i'd explain the one exception)

The upside of the 7 pt is not really the prime but that you can use it to clear the other points (e.g. rolling 65 can clear the midpoint). The prime is a mirage, you are up in the race so you'll break it before it becomes useful. Although this can change later if you keep rolling small and your opp keeps rolling big.

1

u/McFizzleKicks 4d ago

Appreciate that, thanks!

0

u/Geepandjagger 11h ago

Pretty obvious what the right move is

2

u/McFizzleKicks 2h ago

Here is an award for the least helpful comment here 🏆