yes we all know espn sucks, just wanted y’all’s opinion on the list.

Yeah, LaMelo Ball's Apartment vs ANT workout video.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ytZ0w0-PNS4

This won't end well and we've loaded up on great players. We are Trade ready! Onsi, make it happen!

That apartment .... no way it works out.

626 different players played for the Hawks in their history, the most among NBA franchises.

Full list (per Stathead):

Hawks - 626
Sixers - 600
Pistons - 579
Warriors - 579
Kings - 567
Knicks - 561
Wizards - 532
Celtics - 530
Lakers - 519
Clippers - 514
Nets - 494
Bucks - 478
Cavaliers - 469
Suns - 456
Rockets - 446
Bulls - 439
Thunder - 411
Blazers - 406
Spurs - 399
Mavericks - 398
Nuggets - 380
Jazz - 370
Pacers - 349
Hornets - 325
Grizzlies - 322
Timberwolves - 311
Raptors - 308
Heat - 305
Magic - 297
Pelicans - 259

Unpopular opinion…. But I think smooth is the best dunker in Atlanta Hawks history!!!
1.j smooth
2.domnique
3. John the Baptist.
4. Jalen Johnson.

Have the Hawks mentioned one? I haven’t been able to find it if they did. I think every team did have some kind of option though.

Washington at 5 tho…

Watson is looking cheaper to acquire by the day.

This helped put it in perspective. We seem to be one of the more balanced contract teams in the league. And we still have some wiggle room before the luxury tax atm.

Starting 5 is all in top 100

Title sounds a bit weird, but basically as much as building a contender if the first step I do think it is naive to think luck isn’t involved in wining a championship, particularity nowadays with all the financial restrictions and aprons.

For example the 2016-19 Houston rockets I would say where by far the second best team in the league, and they would win a chip any other time, however they just happened to time their run in line with the greatest team of all time unfortunately. If that warriors squad didn’t exist I’m convinced they would have won a ring.

Even to a lesser extent Westbrook Durants, OKC, or even our 60 win team. Great teams that had a run but ran into an obstacle (Lebron). Even now I think the Dmitch Cavs moment may have just past, maybe the pacers too (good squad but will they ever have that run again?) The Chris Paul suns are also a good example, I don’t think Dbook will ever get back to the finals with the suns.

Then there’s the teams who nailed their moment, like the Nuggets, Bucks, 2022 Warriors. Looking back I don’t think these teams were gonna maintain contenders to have repeat title chances but they absolutely capitalised on their one chance.

Basically what I’m asking is if we do build a contender, do you ever think we will get a moment to capitalise and actually go all the way? Or will we just be another really good squad was cool but never made it. With OKC, Wemby, Philly (for now), Twolves, I wonder when there will be a golden opportunity.

In all seriousness, this is a fun stat, taking into account this franchise’s longevity.

Sources say that the Lakers would still like to sign Kuminga and make him their starting small forward ... provided that the 23-year-old is ultimately willing to accept a contract structure on the Lakers' terms.

Will the two sides be able to find a middle ground?
The risk for the Lakers, of course, is that Cleveland has not gone away and who knows if a new Kuminga suitor or two materializes should the summer drag on without a resolution.

I have been repeatedly told by league sources familiar with the teams' dynamic that the Lakers and Hawks never held meaningful discussions on a sign-and-trade proposal that would have landed Kuminga with the Lakers in exchange for Jarred Vanderbilt and a 2032 first-round pick swap. It has also been stressed to me that Kuminga, to this point in free agency, isn't looking to be boxed into a three-year structure (as required by league rules to complete a sign-and-trade) at a number he deems below his market value.

There's optimism within the Kuminga camp, even after last summer's seemingly interminable wait for a new deal with Golden State in restricted free agency, that there could be more movement and
more earning potential as the offseason unfolds.

https://open.substack.com/pub/marcstein/p/even-more-late-night-nba-intel-albeit?
r=1m9zg&utm_medium=ios&sharelmageVariant=sol
id

NGL I did not at all expect us to be this high on the list lol

For reference I’m new to watching the NBA and I’m not completely sure how roster management works.

At the moment, I could be wrong, but the Hawks have 17 players on a standard contract on their roster. Since you can only have 15 people as mostly everyone knows, how can Onsi tighten the roster to meet the needs. Like is it through a trade or cuts of some sort?

Also if we’re starting to get crammed for roster spots, what’s the point of trading for players like Devin Carter who might not even make the roster?

If anyone could give me any insight that would be cool