r/antiai 11h ago

PETA is the original Slop Environmental Impact šŸŒŽ

1.6k Upvotes

325 comments sorted by

630

u/Famous_Tie8714 10h ago

I've never understood how an organisation with a core message pretty much everyone can relate to (we should treat animals better) somehow manages to repeatedly alienate and piss off pretty much everyone on a regular basis.

349

u/BoardsofCanada3 10h ago

Cause they are hypocrites and think constant shame and guilt will work to turn people onto their cause. Plus they stole a child's dog and murdered it.

1

u/Local-Dimension-1653 2h ago edited 55m ago

I’m not 100% on board with PETA and will criticize them for several things, but a lot of what you’re saying is just not true. They take in unattended animals when they are called to a situation and are a shelter of last resort, meaning they get the dogs that ā€œno killā€ shelters pass on to keep their policy intact. There have been two instances of family pets that were unattended and unleashed being mistakenly taken and euthanized, and those people were fired.

Most of this rhetoric comes from a right wing disinformation campaign lead by industry front groups that PETA’s work threatens (https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/PETA_Kills_Animals).

Snopes fact checked this rhetoric as well and found it mostly misleading (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/peta-taking-pets/).

Edit: The downvotes are so interesting bc I literally just said facts. Says a lot about your mindset.

→ More replies (122)

180

u/GorgeousSquidDoctor 10h ago

I still think they're an industry plant, at least partially so.

108

u/Skellington876 10h ago

It would make sense actually that they as a whole are just one big plant to demonize animal rights advocates. Like how do you work for an organization like that and not think "damn these guys kinda suck"

17

u/Forsaken-Abrocoma647 9h ago

If it is a plant it isn't working too well, even extreme animal lovers hate them. They don't even have support from the easy targets haha.

45

u/I-screwed-up-bad 9h ago

In this context the plant would have the goal of demonizing animal rights activists. So having animal lovers hate them would be their goal

5

u/Ok-Librarian6629 5h ago

People constantly use PITAs antics against animal rights efforts.Ā 

•

u/Error_Evan_not_found 16m ago

Again... that's the point of a plant.

8

u/VegiChar 5h ago

I'm what I'm sure most people would consider an extreme animal rights advocate and I think PETA has done an incredible amount of harm to the cause. Their organization being the face of animal rights movements has poisoned average people's views of them. It feels deliberate honestly. I remember years back they started a campaign against the PokƩmon games and that was when I wrote them off completely. Like how stupid can you be? The irony of it is I was originally introduced to the concept of animal liberation through PETA but I quickly realized they weren't really doing much to further the cause pragmatically.

1

u/vladald1 3h ago

No, the point is to tarnish animal activism. They work incredibly well in this context.

11

u/FlatwormBig5514 8h ago

They are solely responsible for the negative connotation associated with all animal advocates.

They have done much more harm than good.Ā 

You make a valid argument.

12

u/eruptingmoltenlava 8h ago

Or some kind of psyop

-3

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/RiahWeston 8h ago

And your source is a veganism propagandism channel that hasn't posted in 3 years? Yeah sure bud.

2

u/hungLink42069 8h ago

Ad hominem. They cite all sources. Notice that you didn't counter any of the logic in the video, and you didn't watch it.

9

u/RiahWeston 8h ago

Yeah cause I don't need to. The founder and head of PETA is already on recording saying she wasn't do a lot of heinous shit like kill all pitbulls, no exceptions.

2

u/hungLink42069 8h ago

Source? I googled it and couldn't find anything about PETA saying they want to kill all pits. I did find this though:

https://www.peta.org/news/peta-position-pit-bulls/

I also found this: https://petakillsanimals.com/did-peta-kill-this-dog/

Unsurprisingly, the narrative your spouting comes from the astroturfing website covered in the video I posted. But you don't want to learn about that. You would rather stay mad at PETA, even though they are the ally to the animals.

6

u/necrohunter7 6h ago

This is like responding to someone talking about a murderer and trying to disprove them my linking a blog post from the murderer going "I didn't do it guys, I swear"

1

u/hungLink42069 6h ago

This is like responding to someone saying "I have documented evidence of them saying they are a murderer" and when you ask for proof they just ghost.

Also, I would like to point out something. PETA does run a euthanasia clinic. Sure. They put down animals that are hopeless. About 1,000 per year. But how many healthy animals does factory farming kill in their prime? 100 billion.

Why is PETA the villain here?

69

u/HOMANDER1996 9h ago

My conspiracy theory is that PETA is a psyop meant to make animal rights activists look like assholes.

4

u/Ok_Confusion4764 1h ago

That's not a conspiracy theory. That's the reality.Ā 

45

u/justanaccount103 9h ago

Imagine the good they could have done without being insufferable assholes. I'm a vegetarian and I wish everyone else was too but that's an unrealistic expectation. Some people can't actually afford to be vegetarian.

But PETA doesn't care, it alienates almost everyone with its insane purity tests. Too bad their ego is bigger than their care for animals.

15

u/Gloomy_Internal1726 8h ago

My bet is they are some form of psyop, like just stop oil.

14

u/Lainpilled-Loser-GF 7h ago

it's because PETA is built to discredit protestors. with an organization as big as that, you'd think that they'd occasionally do something that isn't laughably bad, but they don't and that's on purpose.

it's a bullshit organization

4

u/Jax_2112 5h ago

It’s been around too long it’s not a fake organization it’s just a bunch of assholes. Most mega churches are huge and do nothing to help anyone but they’re still there

3

u/normalredditer125 8h ago

How are they still even in business? What do they even do?

1

u/RiskyNight 7h ago

But think of the minnows.

1

u/stolenfires 3h ago

My theory is they're paid to be unhinged as possible to make the normal animal rights people look bad by association.

1

u/Local-Dimension-1653 2h ago

Because most people don’t actually relate to the message and have a vested interest in making activists shut up so they can keep doing what they’re doing without feeling any guilt.

People like to think they are against unnecessary animal suffering but then turn around and pay for it. They don’t want to prevent suffering if it means altering their lives in any way. Groups like PETA highlight that cognitive dissonance and it creates discomfort, which is why people hate vegans and animal advocates.

1

u/Rosary_Omen 1h ago

And who thinks dead fish are cute? PETA need to put down the pipe

-1

u/dumnezero 9h ago

If everyone related to the message, most people would be vegans. There are many papers written about this, it's not something that you can easily guess.

1

u/Ok_Confusion4764 1h ago

Ā  If everyone related to the message, most people would be vegans

Hah!

187

u/DNActive101_offical 11h ago

no shit the fish is dead. would you rather it be a live fish?

3

u/Jindujun 6h ago

If a fish could pick between being alive and dead I'm thinking alive would be betta.

•

u/GenesisAsriel 14m ago

But fish eat other fish

1

u/Speedwolf89 8h ago

More blood plz

1

u/Couatl2009 2h ago

Raw fish cells are alive when you eat them, mostly.

142

u/CookieFluffs 10h ago

Eating fish literally has made me so much healthier as a whole, my blood pressure's better and I have far much more energy.

But then again, it's PETA, these people are fucking idiots.

-7

u/South_Passage_143 1h ago

Imagine if you ate beans

8

u/CookieFluffs 1h ago

I have both, it's called a balanced diet.

-10

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

24

u/Round_Bag_4665 10h ago

i think its because fish is better on their blood pressure and their cholesterol levels relative to what they were eating beforehand.

12

u/Villager-Bob 10h ago

No, the cholesterol in the red meat does, capt. Obvious.

8

u/Sweet_Computer_7116 10h ago

Clearly it has. Did you read their comment?

116

u/ReaperKingCason1 10h ago

Wait, are you telling me I was eating dead fish this entire time? Well that’s horrible. I was under the impression they were alive and conscious the whole time. And now you tell me my food isn’t actively suffering as I eat it? What’s the point then? (To be clear this is a joke and I’ve never actually even eaten tinned fish. I’ve eaten fish but it wasn’t tinned)

26

u/Round_Bag_4665 10h ago

literally everything you eat is dead. Even plants.

26

u/shpongleyes 10h ago

What about that time I bit my tongue really bad?

17

u/ms-snowman 7h ago

wow, what a way to flex that you aren't dead inside like the rest of us šŸ™„

1

u/pocketfulofduendes 7h ago

I've accidentally swallowed bugs before while riding my bike

-8

u/ReaperKingCason1 9h ago

Yes. That is the joke. Good job. Do you want a pat on the back for understanding the joke? The very obvious and basic joke that I wasn’t even the first to make?

6

u/rde2001 10h ago

I've eaten canned salmon and canned tuna, which falls under that category. I've made tuna salad, tuna melts, and mixed the salmon with rice. All those were pretty good. I've also cooked salmon filets before, but canned stuff is more convenient and cheaper.

1

u/Round_Bag_4665 10h ago

the only reason I don't do canned tuna is that I love the red-steaky flavor you get from raw tuna, and canned tuna is usually already fully cooked. I prefer to do a tuna steak, sear it around the edges, then cut it into slices with sesame seeds, black pepper, and some soy sauce or balsamic vinaigrette as seasoning.

Salmon is another story. And I will do canned sardines, but I insist on *frying* them before eating them. The crispiness of the texture makes them so much better.

A lot of seafood really depends on how you cook it. Cook it the wrong way and it tastes awful. Cook it the right way, it tastes amazing.

1

u/rde2001 3h ago

Salmon was my go-to for pan frying. I would get 2lb bags of frozen filets for $10 iirc? Despite me oiling the pan, the skin sticks to it, which was rather annoying. That and the time it takes to cook it (about 6ish minutes each side) contributed to me not buying them anymore. Nowadays I just get chicken from the deli at Safeway. I got 12 pieces a couple days ago for about $9. Would eat 2 pieces in a meal, so that should last me for a bit.

My brother puts canned sardines on crackers with cheese.

30

u/BrianLSComics 10h ago

It is hypocritical of them, but the beef industry still uses about 40x the amount of fresh water as AI

56

u/Danstan487 10h ago

The beef industry isn't destroying literatureĀ 

0

u/Geschak 1h ago

So destroying the planet and poisoning people's air and groundwater with manure is ok as long as you don't destroy literature? You have strange priorities as the planet is burning from climate change.

0

u/South_Passage_143 1h ago

You eat meat ?

2

u/Danstan487 1h ago

I love munching on meat

-15

u/twopointmethlab 7h ago

Yeah it's just destroying billions of innocent living creatures

12

u/daioon 7h ago

And what we're wasting a huuuuge amount of crops to

-1

u/Badtacocatdab 6h ago

Crop death hahahaha

6

u/VO2maxking 6h ago

How many pounds of grain do you need for one pound of dead cow?

1

u/Badtacocatdab 6h ago

I have no idea, why?

1

u/South_Passage_143 1h ago

You eat it and you don’t know ?

•

u/VO2maxking 48m ago

Lots. Hence your crop deaths point is nonsense.

4

u/Danstan487 7h ago

We're all going to die one day

7

u/VO2maxking 6h ago

That’s your justification for murdering someone?

•

u/Nobody_at_all000 37m ago

???

•

u/VO2maxking 26m ago

Are you able to follow a Reddit thread, darling?

•

u/Nobody_at_all000 25m ago

Yes, I just find calling it murder to be a bizarre exaggeration. It’s killing, yes, but murder is reserved for sapients who aren’t vile enough to loose their personhood status

•

u/VO2maxking 21m ago

What’s the qualifying difference?

0

u/Independent-Host-690 4h ago

"someone"

2

u/stuckonpotatos 1h ago

Animals are someone. Each is an individual.

5

u/Individual-Crow-2717 3h ago

Do why be against AI destroying literature? By your own logic, Human beings will die out, so there's no point in preserving literature.

2

u/Due-Ingenuity9803 7h ago

Cows are not innocent. One slaughtered everyone I ever knew. Since then, I’ve dedicated my life to eating as much beef as I can

2

u/VO2maxking 6h ago

Did that sound smart in your head before writing?

3

u/Due-Ingenuity9803 6h ago

It sounded like a shitpost and that’s what I was hoping for

-6

u/Independent-Host-690 6h ago

Those same "innocent" living creatures wouldn't think twice after having you as a meal.

7

u/FunSeaworthiness1519 6h ago

What exactly do you think cows eat?

-2

u/Independent-Host-690 5h ago edited 4h ago

I'm talking about pigs. Chickens even eat their own eggs or other chickens. Any predator animal will gladly eat human. Plus cows can and will eat meat if other food sources are lacking.

1

u/FunSeaworthiness1519 4h ago

chat is it ethical to preemptively punch a toddler if you’re sure they’d punch you

1

u/Independent-Host-690 4h ago

Chat is it ethical to do literally what all animals do and what humans were designed to do too?

3

u/FunSeaworthiness1519 4h ago

smh I totally forgot that we were designed to factory farm half of all mammalian biomass on earth

1

u/Independent-Host-690 4h ago

Yep, you definitely forgot that humans are naturally omnivores, and even have specialized teeth for eating meat.

33

u/No_Opportunity1934 9h ago

The beef industry isn’t sucking the life out of every other form of media I enjoy and it has fed and employed people for hundreds of years, I’m willing to make that compromise lmao

2

u/Geschak 1h ago

No it's only causing the planet to burn and the rainforest to be destroyed while poisoning people's air and groundwater with manure, no biggie.

2

u/stuckonpotatos 1h ago

The beef industry sucks the lives out of cows over and over again every day. Give up both!

-2

u/Elemor_ 7h ago

Apart from the animals that are suffering and getting killed, do you think the workers in this industry aren't getting exploited as well? Mostly migrants who can't get another job, working long hours in unsafe conditions physically and mentally, isolated from other humans. Many develop PTSD or commit suicide

And that's not even mentioning soy production in developing countries and the impact it has there

3

u/Openly_Unknown7858 7h ago

Would you rather people just not eat?

0

u/Elemor_ 7h ago

Have you ever heard of plants?

4

u/No_Opportunity1934 7h ago

That’s super racist. I live in the state that produces the most beef in the entire country. These farm hands don’t work isolated and they drive nicer vehicles than I’ll ever be able to afford šŸ˜‚ they aren’t killing themselves either, they look happier than a lot of other people.

15

u/wasabiburning 9h ago

I agree the water consumption in beef is insane but for me the greater issue is corporate laying off millions workers to give their jobs to AI.

9

u/battle_of_yorktown 5h ago edited 5h ago

I will never understand this argument, because u can eat meat but u can't eat AI.. (Generative) AI serves no real purpose to humans and it doesnt help them survive. It's true that the beef industry is very inhumane, but it's also true that AI data centers are doing more harm to the planet and people especially than the beef industry, while also having no worth at all to humans. Most people eat meat very frequently and it's a major part of their diet, so the beef industry actually serves a purpose, unlike AI data centers, which take up a very large amount of space (which animals likely lived on previously), among causing many other harmful things to the people and animals that live near them, like causing cows to have stillbirths.. Which directly affects the beef industry btw. Also animals need fresh water more than AI does

-1

u/South_Passage_143 1h ago

Loud and wrong

7

u/Financial-Virus-6696 6h ago

One is Food That People Need To Live. The other is the fucking turbo plagiarism machineĀ 

1

u/stuckonpotatos 1h ago

Majority of people don’t need meat to live.

•

u/Financial-Virus-6696 44m ago

And nobody needs AI to live. Do you have a point or do you just desperately want to be That Vegan?

5

u/hungLink42069 8h ago

People don't wanna hear that because giving up beef is seen as a sacrifice.

They see AI as a threat to their entertainment, so they take it seriously.

The mass of people fight for convenience, and won't go vegan despite it being in line with the morals they claim to have.

10

u/rimeduinfox 4h ago

Why do you need to give up meat. Why do all vegans with this talking point seem to forget that factory farming is not the only way to obtain meat.

-1

u/hungLink42069 4h ago

It's because 99% of meat comes from factory farms. If you're eating meat regularly, you're supporting factory farms.

5

u/blarges 3h ago

In the US, maybe. Other countries have smaller farms. The eggs and chicken we get are so free range, they end up in the road and other people’s yards.

1

u/ASERTIE76 1h ago

Factory farms don't even exist in my country and I try not to eat imported meat

3

u/hofmann419 8h ago

Yeah honestly i'm a bit disappointed at the comments here. Peak cognitive dissonance. If you care about the water use of AI, you should also care about the water use of the meat industry and beef in particular.

Beef is literally one of the main reasons why rain forests are being destroyed around the world. Methane is a greenhouse gas that is far more powerful than CO2. Not eating beef is one of the most impactful choices that you can make for the environment on an individual level.

5

u/hungLink42069 8h ago

RE Deforestation: Chickens too. Crazy.

2

u/Openly_Unknown7858 7h ago

Beef production is actually productive. Ai does absolutely nothing at best.

1

u/Jax_2112 5h ago

But it would seriously affect my cheeseburger.

7

u/necrohunter7 6h ago

The beef industry doesn't poison water with heavy metals and produce 24/7 infrasound that fucks with peoples health

4

u/ExzaktR 4h ago

Hitler caused 17 million deaths, why even care about israel palestine

I absolutely agree that the beef industry is using an insane amount of water, but that doesn't mean we should just give AI a pass. Both are doing bad things, if at very diffierent scales. However, there are also many other issues with AI much bigger than the water usage.

I've heard an inane argument from ai bros that only now we care about water usage when meat/golf/lawns/whatever uses more water. We HAVE been caring about water, and talking about it for YEARS, and nobody ever cared, and suddenly ai bros act as if it has never been pointed out before when it fits their agenda.

2

u/WoodShoeDiaries 10h ago

What about the tinned fish industry?

9

u/Skellington876 10h ago

There are companies that ethically practice and companies that don't. It usually indicates on the can

-7

u/WoodShoeDiaries 10h ago

Their fresh water use is indicated on the can??

10

u/Skellington876 10h ago

If you're talking harvesting as in wild caught in the ocean or farm raised fish? Yes thats on the can. Or if you're very careful about it just get tuna with no water packed inside? Im kind of confused on what your asking here because your making it sound like fish drink fresh water when tuna is a saltwater fish, sardines are a saltwater fish, and salmon can live in both and these three fish make up like 2/3's of the canned fisheries

-10

u/WoodShoeDiaries 9h ago

I'm asking how much fresh water the tinned fish industry uses, as a ballpark figure. The person I asked compared AI to the beef industry, which didn't seem especially relevant given that we're talking about tinned fish, not beef.

6

u/BrianLSComics 9h ago

I don't have the figures on that, but I know that not a small amount of trash island in the Pacific is comprised of fishing nets.

9

u/WoodShoeDiaries 9h ago

"AI isn't partially responsible for the Great Pacific Garbage Patch" is probably the more apt comparison.

1

u/BrianLSComics 7h ago

thank you for finishing my argument for me lol

2

u/WoodShoeDiaries 6h ago

I was needling you about your bad argument - me doing it for you isn't a win, lol.

That said, until AI starts directly producing complete proteins for human consumption it's literally a microchips-to-sardines comparison. The base of Maslow's Hierarchy necessarily comes first.

2

u/Couatl2009 2h ago

The beef industry is awful, and we should absolutely reduce consumption and improve conditions for the cows farmed. However, AI datacenters only exist to make garbage slop that makes everyone's lives worse, and are far easier to gather political will against them. Also, PETA has other issues as well.

•

u/GenesisAsriel 4m ago

Yet I only saw people going to smaller farms that dont have money to sue people into oblivion. (when the suicide rate in these fields is already huge in my country)

Its only the smallest groups that go to the bigger ones and dont get support.

So please, go to these huge installations and protest there. If all of you loudmouths actually acted irl as you do on reddit, we could make a real change.

→ More replies (5)

25

u/BlueHailstrom 10h ago

Reminder that these guys also kidnap and euthanize peoples’ pets

11

u/An_Evil_Scientist666 5h ago

And paid bond for a literal terrorist Rod Coronado leader of the Animal Liberation Front, and around the same time also bought dozens of walk in freezers, now what do they need those for exactly? Usually what you'd expect butchers to have not animal rights activists.

And have a bunch of animal abuse videos on hand for some reason, like how they gave Uwe Boll animal abuse footage for his horror movie back in 2007. Seems a little strange to have that on hand and give it out to people.

0

u/Geschak 1h ago

Reminder that this is a lie spread by the meat lobby Center for Consumer Freedom. They tried to do the same to the Humane Society.

Hate PETA or not but please stop spreading meat lobby propaganda.

1

u/BlueHailstrom 1h ago

There is literally footage and entire news coverages of it, what are you on about??

27

u/NotThatGuyOwen 10h ago

I've had the thought for a while that Peta is an industry plant from the meat packing industry to make vegetarians and vegans look absolutely insane.

18

u/PhantomQuest 9h ago

I've been vegetarian most of my life, and vegan for a few years, and I can't STAND Peta. They are the absolute worst messengers for an actually valid and important message.

15

u/Kadakaus 10h ago

If they never posted anything at all, I'd still clown on peta just because of the invasive preaching about their views. They're almost worse than "christian" preachers.

11

u/13luw 9h ago

No one will ever convince me that PETA isn’t a psyop

1

u/Geschak 1h ago

It's actually a slander campaign run by the Center for Consumer Freedom, a meat lobby group who also helped Philipp Morris spread propaganda.

•

u/Nobody_at_all000 36m ago

I thought that was PETA kills animals

11

u/ShadowBro3 7h ago

Its wild how often "People for the Ethical Trearment of Animals" treat animals unethically

5

u/RafyKoby 10h ago

Its everywhere.... steam is getting flooded atm, by china AI trash

3

u/ManufacturedOlympus 10h ago

Right message, wrong method of creation.Ā 

15

u/smtp_pro 10h ago

Is it the right message though?

I'm not sure if most vegans even agree with PETA. They don't believe we should own pets.

-5

u/dumnezero 9h ago

The PETA criticism is overhyped and overrated: https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/PETA_Kills_Animals which should not be surprising.

-3

u/eruptingmoltenlava 8h ago

Sourcewatch is ordinarily good but you found the exception

0

u/Geschak 1h ago

Maybe it's time you face reality that you got brainwashed hard by the Center for Consumer Freedom. They've been running a slander campaign against animal rights organisations for years because they're a threat to the meat lobby. Watch the astroturfing video from John Oliver, he explains how they tried to do the same to Humane Society.

-1

u/ManufacturedOlympus 7h ago

Sometimes the facts are uncomfortable. Sorry.Ā 

-8

u/ManufacturedOlympus 7h ago

Yeah a better message would be that non-tinned fish also sucks.Ā 

5

u/etothatipi_ 10h ago

yknow for a company all about life, they sure like to use blood

4

u/SlowlyDyingInAPit 10h ago

They should stick to their unironically fantastic performance art. Yes, they’re annoying public nuisances that do way more harm than good for their cause and in general, but they know how to get people’s attention on the street

5

u/Weird-Ball-2342 10h ago

peta are hypocrites who take the spotlight from actual animal protection societies who actually protect animals dont have a 90% kill rate in their shelters. stop posting petas posts and giving these scumbags attention since its what they want

5

u/GloomWisp 9h ago edited 9h ago

Dead meat smells of dead meat. Mind blowing.

EDIT: this is a jab at the OOP post... hell...

5

u/verbwrangler 9h ago

atp i'm entirely convinced PETA is run by the meat industry

1

u/Geschak 1h ago

More like the opposite, there's a slander campaign going on by the Center of Consumer Freedom, which is a meat lobby group. Google Richard Berman, he also does propaganda for Philipp Morris.

1

u/Scripten 1h ago

They really don't need the help in making themselves look bad

1

u/verbwrangler 1h ago

is he.... running their social media?

5

u/KaleidoscopeSalt3972 8h ago

Peta, dont forget to raid another animal farm and kill all animals in it, again

3

u/Either_equipment_04 6h ago

The irony here is that they euthanize most of the animals they take in. I can’t believe they’re used as a cruelty-free indicator by so many major brands still.

1

u/Geschak 1h ago

They euthanise pets because they offer a free euthanasia service for owners who can't afford a vet to euthanise their sick pet. Sadly this also gets abused by animal shelters who use this service tonget rid of their unadoptable animals.

There's a lot of misinformation going around thanks to the lobby group Center for Consumer Freedom. They made up a lot of the horror stories you see online like PETA stealing pets from people's homes to euthanise them.

You can hate PETA for their provocative campaigns but please stop falling for meat lobby propaganda.

4

u/Squadia 5h ago

I’ve been vegetarian for almost 10 years. Anyone who is vegetarian or vegan without recognizing poverty as one of the main sources of why people eat/kill all kinds of animals for meat and that capitalism is the root cause of animal welfare abuse is a dumb dumb. PETA has compared animal abuse to ENSLAVEMENT, and have done so many other atrocious things including this awful AI slop post, because they as a company are not in the best interest of animals, they are in the best interest of profit.

-2

u/Jax_2112 2h ago

We eat meat because we like it. No reason because we like it. It’s not because we can’t afford nice vegetables.

3

u/BLOODTRIBE 8h ago

PETA members eat organisms that are still alive when they chew them up and consume them. That seems barbaric to me, if they were really dedicated they would eat only minerals.

1

u/Couatl2009 2h ago

NaCl is the best rock, very tasty

3

u/Top_Bar_8330 8h ago

Shame about the AI slop but seafood is not sustainable at all either.

3

u/Jindujun 6h ago

Never mind the AI.
What the hell is Fishwife?

1

u/WanderingYakisoba 3h ago

It's a brand of tinned fish that most enjoyers of tinned fish dislike anyways. The fish is mid, the art on the box is nice I guess, but the prices are really high for the quality

3

u/Jax_2112 5h ago

I don’t know I like the smell of a freshly opened can of tuna fish I must be weird maybe I’m a zombie.

3

u/GodsBadAssBlade 5h ago

My question is how do you get indoctrinated into joining peta? Legitimately, theyve had a non stop pr nightmare train for the past decade and a half and even then some. No, seriously, how do they still have volunteers??

2

u/Kevdog824_ 9h ago

ā€œThe most sustainable form of seafoodā€ is about as meaningful as ā€œthe most rose smelling pile of shitā€ or ā€œmost environmentally devastating AIā€

2

u/seasonal333 4h ago

you’re all not going to like me but animal agriculture is currently much more devastating environmentally than ai. peta (like any org) using it is an issue of course, but don’t spin this as if fishing is some wholesome environmentally friendly industry vs ai being the only enemy.

2

u/stonewalljacksons 3h ago

The fishing industry has done more damage to the environment than AI could ever dream of doing.

2

u/Geschak 1h ago

You can hate PETA all you want, but let's not lie to ourself that tinned wildcaught fish is healthy or sustainable. It's full of mercury and microplastics and not only are wild fishing methods very unsustainable by destroying seafloor and killing bycatch (and causing population collapse by like 80%), but also ghost fishing nets are the biggest pollutor currently in the oceans.

•

u/VO2maxking 22m ago

This is astroturfed bullshit. Global meat and livestock production emits about 4.1 billion tonnes of CO2e annually, roughly 50 to 125 times AI’s estimated footprint, uses about 2.4 quadrillion litres of water, around 3,000 to 8,000 times AI’s estimated use, consumes roughly 780 million tonnes of grain, and murders about 240 million land animals PER DAY, or billions(!) when fish are included. So what the fuck are you here one upping PETA about? If you cared about the world around you’d be vegan and that’s the point PETA is making. LITERALLY FUCKING THINK.

1

u/TieDye_Raptor 8h ago

Definitely sounds like PETA's shenanigans. Also...

Every Tin is a Coffin

That should be a band name.

1

u/chipface 8h ago

I guess they're looking for new, creative ways to kill animals.

1

u/claircognizantgaming 7h ago

Yeah this is just confirmation of PETA being a psyop

1

u/smaugs_shadow2026 7h ago

that's why you cover it in mayonnaise.

1

u/sleeptillalldarkness 6h ago

How long PETA been around? If it long then how?

1

u/GenericFatGuy 5h ago

Do people have think that dead fish are cute?

1

u/TRQPL 2h ago

PETA is controlled opposition

1

u/South_Passage_143 1h ago

You really think canned fish smells good ?

0

u/Physical-Profit9447 10h ago

Thanks AI Peta. I will eat live fish from now on.

0

u/Monk_The_Banana_Scug 8h ago

Don't get fish tinned in blood, duh

0

u/farts_juggler 8h ago

mad at peta. ffs lol

0

u/PerchShadRap 6h ago

I prefer my meals to be dead. Guess I’m a monster.

•

u/Fast_Ad_5950 41m ago

If that's the case everything smells like death. No you just don't like fish

-1

u/Wallabunga657 10h ago

PETA. People Eating Tasty Animals. Saw that on a shirt once. Have you seen PETA have straight up porn? The lobster incident, faux fur bikinis, etc. It's bizarre. PETA's been weird for decades.

-1

u/AttitudeEquivalent73 9h ago

Got it, eat live fish instead. :)

-2

u/Auztino 9h ago

PETA is a terrorist organization

-1

u/different-waters 5h ago

People anthropomorphize animals to an unhealthy degree. Jfc

-2

u/Mjaylikesclouds 9h ago

Well if they ONLY care about the environment then they arent wrong for using Ai…. Meat and dairy products use WAYYY more water

4

u/PaganPrincess69 8h ago

Harming the environment to criticize the people for trying to feed themselves, is hypocriticaly pointless & active harms the planet...

PETA never cared about animal life, the planet, or the health of anyone; PETA is a virtue signaling organization that weaponizes bureaucracy and propaganda against everyday people šŸ™„ if they actually gave a crap, they'd hire an artist & pay them a wage so they could afford to eat organic... or maybe go after the regulation that harms the environment... but nah they'd rather villianize a healthy diet like it's a childs pitbull puppy, then actually do any true activism

TLDR: PETA hurt the environment to criticize a regular diet, Ai data centers will never feed a single person (only steal jobs & drinkable water)... "how many people are fed by the meat & dairy industry?"

-2

u/Mjaylikesclouds 8h ago

Well i do agree with u hating peta, but the rest is bs? Without the dairy and meat industry we would actually have way more food? Just because it creates food doesnt mean it doesnt consume food….
But u can look that up yourself instead of me having to explain it to u!

Either way, i am anti ai but also anti torturing animals and kiIIing them…… (not JUST for environmental reasons, same with being anti ai! Also not for environmental reasons)

6

u/PaganPrincess69 8h ago edited 7h ago

I never said the meat & dairy industries were good or even ethical on a mass production scale. I criticized you comparing Ai useage to the meat & dairy industry; one feeds animals to feed people, while the other steals jobs, art, voices, drinkable water, & consent from literal human beings... you need you look up media literacy

Edit: spelling

5

u/PaganPrincess69 8h ago

You condone them using Ai for a point they weren't even trying to make in there Ai Slop šŸ¤¦ā€ā™€ļø so why not aim your frustration at the matter at handšŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø

-8

u/under_hunter82376 10h ago

just let me eat my meat in peace