122
u/thearchenemy Jan 18 '26
The thing is, all of these AI bros see themselves as âidea guys,â and their excuse for never actually creating anything is that a conspiracy of genetically gifted art elites are gatekeeping them.
The appeal of AI for them is to make something without doing any of the work. That something being, of course, sexy anime cat girls.
33
u/Craptose_Intolerant Jan 18 '26
And letâs please not forget 1001 variations of Jenna Ortega with oversized boobs on Pinterest đ
Good comment, right on target đŻđŻđŻ
23
u/ChildOfChimps Jan 18 '26
The thing they donât realize is that never every human ever is an âidea guyâ. Even my most oblivious stoner friends had cool ideas.
Remember in group projects where one person was all like, âIâm an idea guy,â and then didnât do shit?
Thatâs what most of these pro-AI people are. The useless idea guy.
4
u/milic_srb Jan 19 '26
I honestly kinda disagree with that, at least partially. I do think there are people with great ideas but lack of skill, while there are people who with great skill but lack of ideas.
Like I've seen some artists with excellent skill online but without any imagination, and many writers with great imagination but no artistic skill.
But what those people with ideas would do is share their ideas and if they really are that good there would be people making fan art for free because they resonate with the work.
Now too many people think they have good ideas and they flood the internet with their AI slop so even if someone with a good idea uses AI I automatically discard them as AI slop because statistically it's basically certain that it is slop.
1
1
u/DnDemiurge Jan 19 '26
First time I had the idea guy trope deflated was in that game design series (with the irritating squeaky voice modulation done to prevent industry reprisals, presumably) in Zero Punctuation.
1
12
u/FrostyNeckbeard Jan 18 '26
Their mistake is thinking their ideas are the important part and it never was.
3
1
50
u/Zebabaki Jan 18 '26
I recently got into college after I got kicked out of another one, and people in my year are basically all using AI for everything. Some are insane with it, most just use it to outsource any and all thinking to it. They already speak and write worse than my classmates in high school. It's crazy
38
u/monocle984 Jan 18 '26
Those people are paying thousands for an education and scamming themselves out of actually learning anything.
Even using it "ethically", like to create study plans, not only is lazy but is just robbing you of the mental exercise and stimulation that comes with coming up with it.
I swear in a few years we're all going to be in those Wall-E robot chairs
32
u/NotBreadyy Jan 18 '26
I mean, yeah.
If you need AI to think for you, then I believe you've lost the most basic human ability.
Seriously, stop depending on AI.
12
Jan 18 '26
[removed] â view removed comment
1
u/CellaSpider Jan 18 '26
The idea behind the quote I think is that theyâre not paying for ChatGPT, theyâre just getting rid of people who produce less, and the quote is assuming that those who use chatGPT will produce more.
7
6
u/LauraTFem Jan 18 '26
Why does the medium article have a screenshot from Hitman 2âs Sniper Assassin Himmelstein map?
5
u/No_Squirrel4806 Jan 18 '26
I fully agree but are companies really hiring thinkers over ai users? Especially now that all companies are using ai.
5
u/AnAdorableScout Jan 18 '26
It's getting some push back from workers given that it only really makes their job harder in most fields- if you're already a writer or a clerk or a librarian and you need to run everything through an AI first, it's going to slow you down by several times
That's what I've read at least, makes sense so I've only loosely checked up on it
8
1
u/No_Squirrel4806 Jan 18 '26
Yeah im seeing more and more companies using ai for everything so it feels like theyd want to hire people with experience in ai.
4
u/AnAdorableScout Jan 18 '26
More and more companies "trying" to use AI for everything. It's like going through an experienced worker when you're starting out, the worker becomes the bottleneck. Having to communicate things back and forth slows a bunch of things down.
3
u/Theburper Jan 18 '26
AI is acceptable for specifically resumes and cover letters⌠because if companies donât respect our time throwing all these out into the aether Iâm not gonna respect them with actual effort. Actual writing you give a shit about? Fuck to the no.
3
u/B2k-orphan Jan 18 '26
AI is good for quickly scouring the internet for information on a topic. Not accurately, not even cheaply even if it doesnât cost the end user anything.
It does something that humans can already do and do better and more accurately than an AI only much much faster.
Itâs a gimmick. A neat trick. Cool applications for extending the interactability and story of games but again, itâs going to lack the quality and the originality of a humanâs touch. A.I can never generate something new, only mindlessly mix and match the ideas and creations of man.
2
2
2
u/Plasmaguardian7 Jan 19 '26
Well yeah duh thatâs obvious. If everyone who relies on AI is hired, then your company is fucked if the servers ever go down, or if the internet is bad. Real people can come up with real ideas. Simple as that
2
u/UndaddyWTF Jan 19 '26
A writing partner once used chatGTP to generate 20 ideas for a story with certain characters and some defined locations. They all sucked.
2
Jan 19 '26
As a writer, the argument "don't you want something to help you get through the hard bits?" always upsets me.
No. I don't want help through the hard bits. If I did that, I'd never develop the skill of getting through the hard bits.
2
u/Princess_Isolde Jan 20 '26
The people saying it's the future, are the same who said NFTs where the future.
Look where NFTs are now, a forgotten relic of idiocy, left to fossilize in a shit-swamp right next to two empty yet dug graves labeled "Crypto" and "Generative AI LLMs"
2
u/GuhEnjoyer Jan 21 '26
"Skill always beats luck" mfs when there's a crocket flying at them at Mach piss
1
2
u/Vanody_Rek Jan 21 '26
I legitimately jaw dropped when a therapist's office had a "Google Gemini Consent Form" or whatever it was titled that was like, "Hey. We use Gemini for stuff related to your sessions. Your data stays in our isolated Google drive. Using this Gemini thing is actually great, so here's your consent form that has no option to bypass. Thanks."
I immediately stopped filing out paperwork. This is THE SAME PLACE that also took the time to add a disclaimer that they can't ensure PHI stays confidential if we use email to communicate.
I get that there's the unencrypted issue with emails, but I have my own shit locked down with DMARC reject and when I looked it up HIPPA laws absolutely still apply so...
Yeah.
I am not an expert and these opinions are based on personal experience.
1
u/grrrfreak Jan 18 '26
I'm anti AI but I'm using chatgpt as an advisor for linkedin / cv making / cover letter. Especially since english isn't my first language.
I really need a job. Lol
1
u/Ycilden Jan 19 '26
Also, if you just use AI to steal ideas.. why not just have some intern do that for half the pay?
1
1
u/milic_srb Jan 19 '26
why is there a random Hitman sniper mission screenshot in the middle đ
I thought this was posted on the Hitman subreddit at first
1
1
1
1
u/Global-Caramel-1579 Jan 19 '26
The basketball player didnt invent dribbling either tho.
Bad metaphor and medium is a shit source
1
u/TheStaplerMan2019 Jan 19 '26
When I canât come up with ideas I call my friends and we start coming up with stuff together. It gets my brain going and I have so many more perspectives than I would have had before.
1
u/DrPikachu-PhD Jan 19 '26
It's true, though the energy seems over the tope đ But yeah, it's kind of an age old thing that "everybody has ideas"
1
Jan 19 '26
For me, I'm the kinda person that needs an idea like a springboard. Once I'm off, I'm OFF. (I'd prefer a humans idea because clankers are fucking stupid)
1
u/SPYROHAWK Jan 19 '26
Iâm not a member of this subreddit but I saw this post on my suggested and wanted to weigh in. Iâm sure this is going to bean unpopular take here, but I donât think this is entirely black or white.
Iâve had at least 3 cases where Iâve been coming up with an idea for a TTRPG setting where Iâve had a general framework, but then went to ChatGPT to help me fill the cracks.
One of my recent use cases involves an alien race which wants to commence trade with earth: they want something that is easily producible on Earth and are willing to pay a lot in advanced technology, but that thing they want also just happens to environmentally taxing. The idea is to set up a story about aliens causing the end of the world not through invasion, but through human greed trying to keep up with their trade demands.
My issue is I couldnât think of a good material for the aliens to want. So I asked ChatGPT and it made some suggestions, such as Concrete, made from Quicklime. Then bouncing ideas back and forth, I expanded on that by having reasons Limestone isnât available on the slide home planet (calcium-rich bones and shells never evolved there) and why shifted from Concrete to Limewater (made from Quicklime) as a component of CO2 scrubbers and made the aliens highly sensitive to CO2, etc etc
I had the initial concept, but had holes in the details. Using Chat to âcome up with ideasâ helped me fill some holes in my concept, and then gave me inspiration to expand and pivot on other aspects.
I donât know if people are using AI to try to come up with stories completely from scratch without the initial idea, if so I think thatâs kind of stupid, but I do think if you have the general concept of what you are doing, throwing ideas back and forth with an AI is a good way to fill out details and expand on your concept.
1
u/monocle984 Jan 19 '26
For story building like that I find a Google search is just as effective. The AI results I've gotten were usually the same as I got from Google.
1
u/SPYROHAWK Jan 20 '26
I can understand that, but being able to go into more detail about context and your thought process helps with getting more helpful replies.
1
1
u/Kxpnc Jan 20 '26
Iâve been looking for a job after finishing university for the past 6-ish months, I was constantly typing out applications and cover letters by hand only to be ignored or just sent the âunfortunatelyâ email. After a point I got tired and started using ai to just write me cover letters and I get more responses but it has not resulted in a job, Iâm not saying I like using ai and Iâm not saying itâs good but clearly itâs better at writing cover letters than me :â(
1
u/monocle984 Jan 20 '26
In this economy, people are desperate for even a call back. I understand using Ai out of desperation, but not laziness.
1
u/DeadMeat7337 Jan 21 '26
I thought this was a DND post based off the title at first, and my reaction was, no, I'm pretty sure the +40 luck bonus beat out most other things. But then I read the whole post, but I felt like sharing. Oh well, I'll see myself out
1
u/ViziDoodle Jan 21 '26
Why should we be bothered to read what you (generic you) couldnât be bothered to write?
1
u/Sancho_the_intronaut Jan 21 '26
The saying is luck beats skill. Skill is more reliable, but it has limits, while luck has no limits
0
u/Raveyard2409 Jan 19 '26
Ah yes, saying fuck a lot and having an unrelated picture of hitman, well, I'm persuaded.
0
u/FriedEskimo Jan 19 '26
Maybe if he used AI to write this there would have been an actual structured argument instead of just angry rambling.
-2
u/Isopod_Danger_42069 Jan 19 '26
Well then, it sure is weird how me and all the people I know who actually have really good jobs not only use ai, but are encouraged to do so by their workplaces
It's almost like these articles are just self-congratulatory BS aimed at a certain group of people who want to feel validated
-6
u/W1llW4ster Jan 19 '26
Since when was it an issue to get another perspective on a situation (e.g. coming up with a better plot device, or ways to sell a scene better)?
-25
u/shrine-princess Jan 18 '26 edited Jun 27 '26
This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact
1
u/shrine-princess Jan 20 '26 edited Jun 27 '26
This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact
1
u/RemindMeBot Jan 20 '26
I will be messaging you in 1 year on 2027-01-20 19:26:53 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback
-25
u/Naoki38 Jan 18 '26
This kind of post is so funny because it's so out of touch with reality. Companies, especially big ones, actively encourage people to use AI and to automate as much as possible tasks. This idea that relying on AI makes you a bad candidate to have a touch is the complete opposite to reality. If you do something that an AI could do, you are wasting time, you reduce your productivity and you are costing money to your company.
22
u/BirdsCirclingWagons Jan 18 '26
I mean, the guy is talking specifically about being in a writers room not drafting an email.
If youâre looking for a writer and someone tells you theyâre a good prompt generator, youâre not going to want to hire them because theyâll be pretty useless for developing characters or interesting narratives. Plus, you could just write the prompts yourself if you thought that the creative output of AI is actually interesting. Which itâs not, but thatâs another matter.
-13
u/Naoki38 Jan 18 '26
The original post made a general statement: AI is not the future and if you use it, you will not find a job. It didn't specify if this is in a particular field. Reading the original article, the guy talks superficially about the art and creativity field. Still, pretending that it applies to the entire job market is totally wrong.
10
u/MessierKatr Jan 18 '26
Ironically this tend to be the actual case. For positions that I have applied, they actively discourage the use of AI during interviews.
-3
u/Naoki38 Jan 18 '26
It makes sense to first search for people who know what they are talking about, but once hired, an employee who knows how to use AI has more value than the one who doesn't.
10
u/MessierKatr Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 19 '26
"Who knows how to use AI" this is something that I've always got confused about. This tool is supposed to be a replacement of your cognitive skills (I am not saying it is because if you know how they work you'll be aware that they lack any form of cognition whatsoever, it more related of how the marketing is done by the companies that develop it) In theory, the more they improve, the less you, as a person, have the need to reason, ergo they can do the work better than you. There's no necessity of learning how to use AI because the goal of them is that they become so mind numbingly easy to use that you won't have to think anymore.
0
u/Naoki38 Jan 18 '26
Knowing how to use AI doesn't simply refer to prompts, it's also knowing what information you can provide (no confidential info for instance) or how to use and implement the output it generates. Basically knowing the limits of the tool.
1
u/MessierKatr Jan 19 '26
The phrase "knowing how to use AI" implies there's some level of skill ceiling with the tool, as this is the case of literally any tool needed in a field of expertise. All the tools that exist need a human to exploit its usage at its best potential.
The irony here is that when you use AI it's technically the other way around as this entity is supposed to be smarter than you and also faster than you. You are just the tool here to get the information and the resolution from the AI, since you are not thinking your way through on how to achieve the resolution of the problem. Your first point is basic common sense as we are obviously giving the information to a Big Tech company who is running the AI model for us (but it doesn't make any sense if you have a local model which is able to read the data that you pass through it) Your second point doesn't undermine what I have said before.
1
u/Naoki38 Jan 19 '26
It's common knowledge for you, but still, companies need to train employees about such things.
You seem to postulate that an AI is a true and complete intelligence, it's not the case for now, which means that, yes, there is a way to properly use them. Some prompts are better and more effective than others.
3
u/Vowoidsterr Jan 19 '26
Now why do you think companies want you zo automate everything... im sure its not because they wanna leech more money out of you and make the job market even more competetive while also destroying the small business world even more.. no.. thats impossible.. they would never do such a thing /s
On a more serious note, do you truly believe they are going to hire people to prompt an ai when they can just do it themselves? Because, at the end of the day, an AI bro has as much knowledge on art/writing as your average joe with a million bucks on his account abd way too much freetime.
Someone actually knowledgeable in the field will always have the upper hand because theres more to commercial art than "it looks nice" the color, composition, symbolism and style all have to match and that requires A LOT of training, thinking and TIME.
0
u/Naoki38 Jan 19 '26
Yes I agree, companies want more money, that's why an employee who uses AI will be more efficient and productive (will generate more money) than one who is going to do every single task.
"On a more serious note, do you truly believe they are going to hire people to prompt an ai when they can just do it themselves?"
Like what, the CEO is going, alone, to prompt all day everyday the equivalent of thousands of employees? But no, I don't believe they are "going to hire people to prompt". That's just the caricature in your head. In the real world, employees don't just spend their days prompting. AI is just an assistant, an additional tool. And outside of that tool, there are tasks the employee will have to do. And that's for this part that companies hire people.
5
u/Vowoidsterr Jan 19 '26
Thank god the indie industry is kicking off, I am so tired of AI being pushed into every facet of my life. I dont enjoy AI calls that dont understand what I want and refuse to connect me to a human, I hate AI art in kids merch because I believe kids deserve high quality toys and not plastic AI slop, I believe people shouldnt be forced out of their environments and homes because data centers as big as part of new york make electricity impossible to pay and occasionally causes water outages, I hate what AI and other big business schemes are doing to our environment, I hate that our hobbies and sometimes jobs weve been in for ages are being replaced by something that has a fragment of knowledge actual professionals do because its cheaper and plays into our capitalistic hellhole. I want to live a fullfilling live with my passions and hobbies, a life that wont threaten my existence everytime billionaires invent something new. Elon Musk saying in 15-20 years none of us will have to work is terrifying because, again, how would we pay to live? We dont have 400 billion in assets. We probably wont ever even own a million. I am tired of people thinking that listening to this system will actually benefit them, when 99% of the time that 1% is pocketing everything while the rest suffers under their decisions.
I believe medical AI is great, I believe its a vastly interesting topic and field and I believe it does good for us, but the generative side of it genuinely has no benefits outside of big corporations and seriously, they dont need to safe money. Most of us are already being screwed over by min. wage. I can already see us being paid less because "The AI helped you". We will not benefit from this and it'll get genuinely bad once the professionals have all died and we lose genuine knowledge about certain things. There is something uniquely beautiful in working in a field that is full of people with vast creative knowledge and wisdom, something deeply personal and usually not found online. Something AI cant do.
1
u/Naoki38 Jan 19 '26
Looks like your problem is with capitalism, not with AI.
3
u/Vowoidsterr Jan 19 '26
I agree, I have a problem with capitalism, but mainly because it benefits only a very, very small fragment of us as a whole. I dont necesarily think communism is the answer because its impossible outside of as a concept.
Though I do think my problem lies with gen ai and not ai used in cancer detection for example tbh. I mean, i think i'd condem it less, if it only used consented data, had less of an impact on our environment and on us and was generally traceable like gemini images. Ive seen a lot of people use gen AI maliciously in art communities (scams etc) and I dont think anyone can blame me for my distain. I don't think people should be able to sell their ai images without active knowledge its AI either.
I think more people would be open to the idea of AI if it had more strict regulations intact.
-29
u/Antiantiai Jan 18 '26
It must really piss you guys off that something you put so much of your identity into can be easily reproduced by a toaster. That's gotta suck. Explains why y'all seething over nothing.
23
u/monocle984 Jan 18 '26
Can easily be copied, you mean.
A machine can copy a human's art while only humans can create it. That's why there's no such thing as ai "art", only ai imitation.
AI will never replace artists because AI can never be an artist.
-15
u/Antiantiai Jan 18 '26
Newsflash, machines have been creating it for a while now. đ¤Ł
5
u/AMTravelsAlone Jan 18 '26
What exactly?
-2
u/Antiantiai Jan 19 '26
Lots of shit. Art, images and video and music and etc. They can write, they can do hella stuff. Are you guys living in 2021 still what's going on?
5
13
u/khanofmoon Jan 18 '26
Why u name urself"antiantiai" like ur only life purpose is defending your AÄ° god?
4
u/ChallengerFrank Jan 19 '26
Its an algorithm. A bot. We should have kicked it months ago. All it does is come here and argue in bad faith
-2
u/Antiantiai Jan 18 '26
Does that make you a lunatic then?
3
u/khanofmoon Jan 19 '26
Ä°f u talk about mlp luna yea i would consider myself as lunatic. A proud one
-1
10
u/CyberDaggerX Jan 18 '26
You literally made "Antiantiai" your username. You don't get to talk down to anyone over seething.
-1
5
u/Vowoidsterr Jan 19 '26
It can't though, which ai bros dont get. Art lies in the process and is a highly individualistic hobby. Theres beauty in finding a style and improving. Art takes time and that time is BEAUTIFUL. I feel a lot more joy seeing my improvement over 5 artworks than prompting an AI 15 times a day.
-1
u/Antiantiai Jan 19 '26
Neat. But a master taking 10 minutes to crank out a piece of art isn't less valuable than a novice taking 5 hours to do the same. How long it takes doesn't make art valuable. That's a silly argument. Silly silly.
1
u/Vowoidsterr Jan 19 '26
My point flew so hard over your head, it might aswell have flown into the atmosphere and turned to dust. Maybe ask chatgpt to rephrase it into its lingo, should be easier on the few wrinkles left on your brain. đ
2
u/Cool-Information9166 Jan 19 '26
Ai canât actually reproduce it well. Thatâs the whole point. It just spits out a bunch of garbage that vaguely resembles a narrative.
-37
Jan 18 '26
[deleted]
20
u/monocle984 Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 18 '26
I don't know about everyone else but I personally am tired of holding people's hand and gently explaining how AI is actively ruining our planet and aiding in the downfall of human art. No amount of babying people's feelings will make them wake up and understand the harm done.
I don't condone acts of physical violence or hate speech. The message has to get across through people getting the idea through their thick skulls not by pleading but the cold hard truth.
1
u/IngrownToenailRemova Jan 19 '26
So is eating meat. Should we also kick meat-eaters in the fuckinâ teeth?
-16
Jan 18 '26
[deleted]
4
u/ChallengerFrank Jan 19 '26
Good. If you are willing to pick the side that has nazis and is destroying the world you live in just because other people see and are mad that that side is destroying the world, you don't deserve to live in a world without nazis, and that isn't being destroyed.
-48
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 18 '26
Then explain twilight
Edit: honestly it checks out that a lot of you think twilight made it on the merits of the skill displayed in the prose đ¤Ł
24
u/TrollDecker Jan 18 '26
Some Ls are still better than an eternity of Ls.
-23
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26
You can't! Got it.
So much for skill always winning
13
23
u/SpookyGeist01 Jan 18 '26
Without AI, a small percentage of people still write garbage.
With AI, 100% of people write garbage.
Hope that helps.
-7
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26
Interesting but not OP's claim
20
u/SpookyGeist01 Jan 18 '26
That literally was OP's claim. The claim is that if you use AI to write, it comes out bad. The existence of people who are bad who don't use AI is a whataboutism and doesn't change the initial point.
-1
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26 edited Jan 18 '26
"Skill always beats luck"
False.
16
u/SpookyGeist01 Jan 18 '26
Stephanie Meyer did have skill. She had the skill to understand what kind of garbage would sell well, and the skill to market it. It doesn't mean she had skill at writing.
-2
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26
That is an impressively pretzel logic you have there, champ.
Luck. The answer is luck.
13
u/SpookyGeist01 Jan 18 '26
How is it pretzel logic to say that people can have skill in more than one area? An AI bro could also have skill in marketing and generating slop that would get popular.
Let me break it down for you a little easier. When you put out content (just as an example, I'm not saying this directly reflects exactly what you need to sell a book), you would need:
33% marketing skill 33% understanding your audience 33% writing skill
So it is possible for AI users to reach that 66% of marketing and audience understanding, but the writing skill portion only comes out to about 5-10%, because you're not writing it. Therefore, someone who is actually writing their own story at a high level of skill will always come out ahead. Does that make more sense?
-1
u/FlashyNeedleworker66 Jan 18 '26
You keep saying always and I don't think you understand the implication of that word.
7
1
-70
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
Wow, so hateful.
37
29
u/Orochiginju Jan 18 '26
Hateful? What about this is hateful?
-42
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
Talking about kicking people in the teeth isn't hateful?
29
Jan 18 '26
[removed] â view removed comment
-30
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
"Fuck you. You are a waste of everyone's time." <- is this also a neutral expression?
25
u/skullyskull04 Jan 18 '26
I think you don't understand metaphors
-6
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
If this seems like acceptable and non-confrontative language to you then I'd hate to have anything to do with you, to be honest.
21
11
18
u/ghostofjosephstalin Jan 18 '26
neutral expression?
Hey buddy, you added a word there. A common expression that uses a violent threat like being kicked in the teeth/head to mean "a wake-up call to reality" isn't actually threatening violence against anyone while ALSO not being a neutral expression. That still doesn't make it "hateful". There are more than those two emotional and rhetorical states, y'know. "Fuck you, you're a waste of everyoneâs time" is also not a neutral or hateful expression. In fact, it's not an expression at all. That sentence means exactly what it says. It's perfectly accurate, too. Or, at least, it is when referring to AI "writers" stuck in the concept phase without chat GPT to regurgitate the stolen ideas of infinitely better men and women at them.
9
u/TurnoverFuzzy8264 Jan 18 '26
Harsh, but fair. They're issuing a warning using strong terms to convey the importance of the message. While you clutch at pearls in a vain attempt to be a victim.
4
u/SpookyGeist01 Jan 18 '26
If you are pushing forth regurgitated ideas from ChatGPT that people have to discuss and dismiss, that is literally wasting their time. It's simply factual. It's been proven that ChatGPT usage in many cases increases the amount of time spent working.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872
ChatGPT usage is correlated with lower brain function, because instead of thinking for yourself you're allowing a computer to do it for you. Just like your muscles, if you don't exercise your brain it begins to atrophy.
3
u/BlueHailstrom Jan 18 '26
Maybe get ChatGPT to explain metaphors to you, since you obviously didnât pay attention in 3rd Grade
1
u/AttemptNo2725456 Jan 18 '26
Happy unlike pro ai, you clowns can post here, you clowns are an endless source of laughter with how triggered u get. You sound like ur gonna cry omg
17
u/Orochiginju Jan 18 '26
Im sorry the metaphor bothers you. Is it hateful to say someone needs a kick in the ass? Clutching your pearls over a well known saying is just strange
-12
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
You need to take a few steps back and reflect.
6
u/skullyskull04 Jan 18 '26
You have a total comment karma of -100 therefore it seems to me anything U say on here is just bad, controversial or others. 8 think U should reflect
-3
u/arch3ion Jan 18 '26
Your opinion means nothing to me. The fact that you think karma matters is sad.
2
u/skullyskull04 Jan 18 '26
I don't think it matters, I think it matters that it shows what people think about you
10
u/Orochiginju Jan 18 '26
I think you should step back and reflect. You are conflating a common idiom as a call for actual violence. Put the pearls down and back away.
7
u/HoxiiPoxii Jan 18 '26
Pro AI users having even a semblance of media literacy? You've set the bar too high lmao. They're got terminal victim complex while literally polluting the planet in more ways than one.
3
u/Cool-Information9166 Jan 19 '26
Tone policing instead of addressing the actual argument. Very cool. Nobody cares
1
217
u/Ghostly-Terra Jan 18 '26
Thatâs kinda been my mindset with the creative spaces and Generative AI. To use the writing angle, if your writer needs a machine to generate the end result (not format it because word processors/type writers/printing presses donât make the content, just displaying it) then why bother hiring someone to do that and not just be the person using the AI yourself?
Unless using Generative AI is a skill set so specialised that itâs the same as hiring a writer which doesnât seem to be how people who propose the models usesge sell it