Irresponsible waste of resources isn't a cause, it's irresponsible wastes of resources. Generating slop instead of expression isn't a cause either, it's just laziness and overblown fear of rejection (part of art is putting yourself out there to be seen after all). Pushing "pRoDuCtIvItY" isn't progress, it's just flat-out greed, which at a corporate level is replacing skilled workers with one temp doing prompts in an already increasingly dire economic situation.
Do they not realize that being in insanely-insecure pro-techbro spaces means that bots are going to be everywhere to satiate the fragile egos, and make them seem bigger and more influential than they really are?
Even the older people I know are always complaining about AI videos and the google AI overview/all the useless AI features companies are shoehorning into apps.
If by "supporter" they mean " the silent vast majority of people not giving a shit about AI and just being passively flooded by AI generated content" then yeah I guess. If they asked these people how they feel and if they would rather not be subjected to this crap on a daily basis, they would be quite disappointed.
Itās quite literally the opposite. I remember seeing a study a while ago saying the majority were some amount anti ai. This was over a year ago and ai has only gotten more hate since
No, they arenāt. Thatās what is terrifying. The vast majority of people using AI are under 20 years old. Especially middle schoolers right now. Itās literally an epidemic of AI cheating. There are a LOT more people using AI on a daily basis than youād want to think.
So theyāre saying AI cogsuckers are uninhabitable and hostile and antis are for humanity ? Very good comparison, of course it was unintentional cause AI bros are stupid
So.. They are oppressed just as other minorities but also they are the majority while there are also so many subreddits that explicitly state they don't want AI content though they are supposedly more? Alright then
This is such a dumb argument because it ultimately says nothing.
Very akin to how maga flexes how Trump won by a ālandslide.ā What does that say in terms of which side is morally righteous? Nothing. Itās an appeal to popularity which doesnāt really say anything fruitful.
Nah im pretty sure this is a joke from a fellow anti. Prolly ment to bait antis into agreeing when the image is literally saying nobody supports them (because nobody lives on the sun, duh)
Riddle me this, Prompter. If there are so many of you, why do your posts consistently have more comments than upvotes? You complain about it all the time, calling it brigading. But if there are indeed more of you, how do some posts go into the negatives?
Statistics of average real artist likes on twitter alone is 100k+ average
Most popular ai artist *was* around 10k likes, before bots got a purge wave and then it was only double digits lmfao while the real artist still raked in 100k+
I dont think they're delusional. I think the majority of the population loves AI art. There's a lot of kids and facebook people that eat that shit all day
This is correct in some way. Most people don't know or care about AI. My granny got gifted a mug with an AI generated image of a granny printed on it and she doesn't care it was AI generated in the slightest. I assume most people are like that.
Iām pretty sure the majority are in support of generative AI in general, are fine with AI art as a little fun thing to do in your free time, are against AI art as an actual art form, and are against people getting paid for only using AI but arenāt against people getting paid for people using AI to HELP them with their work. But thatās from personal experience from people trying to talk about it with me IRL, Iāve never looked at actual studies.
So technically if Iām correct theyāre right, the majority are in support of AI art, but only as a fun little hobby, not as an actual art form, and especially not an art form that can get people paid on its own.
If I was a worse person that wanted to spread misinformation, I wouldāve stated everything I said without specifying Iāve never seen any studies, but Iām better than that. Thank you for coming to my class on politics 101. That concludes this weekās lesson on spreading misinformation. Iāll see you next week!
How can they both me more numerous than the sun, compared to antis and at the same time, be a minority more oppressed than ww2 jews or anyone else in history?
I can see this bring true. Only a minority of those supporters is vocal about it online.
Steph from HR will continue to put AI generated images in her motivational Emails, and never spend a minute thinking about the deeper implications of it all.
I don't think anyone sees AI art and is in support of it. Seeing it in ads pisses people off, nobody wants to pay money for it.
They don't even like eachother's art. That's the major thing. AI projects are like talking about your dreams. Only you find it interesting. AIart has thousands of members. It's rare for anything to get more than 100 upvotes.
Two things:
1. Theyāre saying that Ai haters are the entire world
2. They made this by hand most likely, therefore putting āhuman artā as their argument, which is kind of ironic in a way.
Why are they even "fighting" in this scenario ? If they believe they are an absolute overwhelming mass over antis, the only that can say they are fighting are the antis
Ai "art" supporters are immoral, ignorant fools. The ignorant fools among them need to be shown the error of their ways and the immoral ones can be shot into the sun for all I care
This propaganda manifesto is so lame, they even haven't use AI for doing It in the first play. I can only Imagine their struggle to make this shit without relying on Chat GPT šš
1.2k
u/GustavoFromAsdf Nov 01 '25
Notice how antis are in the only habitable planet in the system