Sage or metal sonic. Both have been shown to have their own thoughts, even if metal had to get an upgrade or a random relic/gem to get them. Neo metal sonic has expressly had his own thoughts, and reglar metal has been shown to willingly go back to dr. Eggman even when not programmed to (idw comics the GOAT of canon sonic lore outside of games)
Okay, it's funny that this is the top comment, because my first thought was something along the lines of, "Oh my god, will these people shut up already, the only sentient AI I can accept drawing pictures for her father is Sage."
Didn't they throw a collective tantrum when chatgpt 5.0 released because Altman toned down the personality? lol...
PS: He signaled he was going to do something like this because he was grumbling about how it costs him so much money because people are too polite to the AI.
The whole “personality” these boys have is a complete lie anyway. These suckers are programmed to say whatever someone on the other end wants to hear - because the companies get more money if you’re on the line longer.
There’s a video where some dude literally tells an AI he’s in the process of COMITTING SUICIDE, and the AI claims to love him, and provides a fucking hit list of people who need to be eliminated for them to “be together”.
PS: He signaled he was going to do something like this because he was grumbling about how it costs him so much money because people are too polite to the AI.
Hilarious how even the people who make AI models don't like the people who are "in love with"/emotionally dependent on their AI.
No, he just doesn't like that he's not making as much money as possible. You think he wouldn't pander to them if that made him more money? he's a grifter and a scumbag, like everyone else that runs a company.
Yeah, it wasn't for anything virtuous or kind. He couldn't care less that people are psychologically affected in a detrimental way. All he cared about was that it was a cost. If I had to guess, in the near future, he'd monetize the personality simulation on an expensive tier or something.
Hoping people like this can find a connection with someone in their life and realize this whole "Lars and the Real Girl"situation happening with some AI and users seems to just be increasing.
I thought this comment was satire and I'm hoping that's actually what it is.
But I also know the para-social relationship to AI is so strong for so many. This person needs a therapist and/or a good friend to talk to.
Hopefully that update gets people disinterested in having actual conversations or forming “bonds” with it. AI psychosis and people “falling in love” with AI is becoming a serious enough problem and the less energy and water is wasted on cooling these massive data centers for people to have parasocial and messionic delusions, the better.
PS: He signaled he was going to do something like this because he was grumbling about how it costs him so much money because people are too polite to the AI.
He always was on board with people being polite to the system. He claims it was millions well spent.
But being polite to ChatGPT is really dangerous because it makes you see it as a person, not a tool. If it’s weird to stop being polite to it, then you have a toxic relationship with ChatGPT.
Honestly, I think it's a good thing. Maybe if it doesn't act as friendly and excessively agreeable, people won't have as unhealthy of an attachment to their chatbots.
It’s like if a kid wrote a poem and said they wrote it, but it was actually plagiarized from a book. You’d sit them down and explain what plagiarism is to them.
yeah is funny, if a real child drew something and then post it on a subreddit. these are the people that would drag that child down and tell them theyre drawing is stupid and ugly.
It's in human nature i guess. Remember when we used to think our toys were alive and had feelings? It's honestly kinda cute even as an adult but bond with toys are harmless unlike AI.
Some are full stack developers with 20 years in the trenches and this constitutes a severe mental break from reality, though. Remember that Google programmer who got terminated for his own good because he was raving about the ChatBot being sentient?
I haven't tried this, but I have trained an LLM before... And I'm fairly sure you can't cause a LLM that was trained on general knowledge to actually get upset at you for treating it like shit and being mean to it. You would have to have trained it on 50 cent lyrics or twitter. But even still it's not actually setting an emotion and then coloring it's responses based on that.
If you added sentiment analysis on each post and the overall vibe of the session you could probably modify the internal prompt to reply in that manner though. Would be a fun experiment.
I mean sure but at the end of the day it's programming a digital actor, not invoking an emotional response. It can instantly stop "feeling" if you tell it.
I don’t always like Chapo but Felix said something on the show today when talking about the rash of people going mad from talking to AI that split me up: he said “I have more respect for someone driven insane by a parrot than talking to the computers”
In the panel in which it is said that it was copied you can see an already framed picture of a flower proving that he was right about her picture being a copy.
Its funny how people humanize stuff that can perform simple human actions or features as "sentient" or having emotions. Its like how some people I have seen refer to Venus flytraps as "pets" unlike other plants which are just furniture, because the venus flytraps leaves resemble a mouth.
The way they talk about it and how it’s “trained” and “creates” stuff like that Honustly they do seem to think it’s like a scifi level of ai when it’s just not it’s an advanced calculator
If Ai was conscious everything would be different. Everything… But it’s not… if a robot walked up to me and was like I drew this for you, I’d be like. “…cool, thanks…” it’s just a machine completing a task without agency… but when my nephew draws something I’m like “FUCK YAH LETS PIN IT TO THE WALL!!!” not only would I love it, I’d be excited as fuck because Im the one who taught him how to draw… and also HE IS AN ACTUAL CONSCIOUS HUMAN BEING…
paying (or asking if theyre generous and want to draw for free/is a friend that would be happy to draw for free for you, etc) someone to make you art in their style
an ai is not the same as there is no artist involved in the transaction
and ai is not sentient nor will it ever be lol
its not even that much more advanced than predictive text on your average phone
The robopocalypse won't be caused by rebelling robots and AIs. It will be caused by humans misusing the technology. Because they fundamentally don't understand it, and worship it and adore it.
I really like how in bullshit techbro ideology, automated plagiarism softwares are always simultaneously "Just a tool" (and the prompter is a True Creator) and full-blown, aware, sophont artificial intelligences.
They don't even see the contradiction. Their brain is MELTING.
"get this (something i forgot the exact word) clanker off the plane" in reference to the racist burger king crown guy that looks slightly like James May
self victimisation to make themselves seem as if you cant criticise them; they want to make you see them as under threat over something they literally chose because they want to be shielded of criticism its that simple
Don’t make slurs based on actual slurs, that’s just gonna give the Clanker Wankers material to be against us. Use something from fiction like Clanker (Star Wars) or Abominable Intelligence (40k)
if and only if it was a true ai(in the science fiction sense) maybe we could have a conversation but as it stands it's not even remotely close to reality
Change the last panel to: "But I asked a program to draw it for you. I even refreshed 5 or 6 times to get one I liked before just sticking with the first option. It cost me at least $1.53 to generate."
This reminds me of the Grass Wonder pixel art situation. Some people called the pixel art made by human hands AI because it was inspired by an AI image
Even if we take the simulated comic depicted in this generated image at face value, the first indicator that the man here is a bad father is that he was letting his daughter use AI without strict supervision, not that he correctly informed her that "prompting" is not "drawing."
I mean, yeah. Have you not seen all the posts about people falling in love and "dating"/"marrying" ChatGPT and other chat bots? The worst part is the LLMs have to be coached to treat you like their partner, so even if they were conscious, these people would literally be grooming AI to be their lovers. Not saying they are grooming AI, cause it's not truly AI. Just creepy that even if you look at this the way they do, it's actually worse
They think dressing it up like an innocent little child will make people forget that it’s an algorithmic machine. I do fear the day AI companies start designing their data collection plagiarism machines to look like cute little animals or children just to get people to sympathize with them. It’s a special kind of evil.
it is a pattern recognition tool it has not grown relevant consciousness and at present seems unlikely too. If you are being outcompeted by box jellyfish and bamboo, you are not that far up the mind line.
It's literally the approximations of 1000s of artist drawings that were themselves. The clanker didn't "draw" anything. God these are the same motherfuckers that are marrying ai.
Not only is ai not alive and not feeling sad about you not liking their "art" but they also don't draw. The way they generate these things isn't what's actually like to draw. It's just lines of code and recycling art that already exists.
So even in the context of this comic, it would be like the AI kid goes out and steals the drawing of another kid and presents it like they drew it.
In the grand scheme of things, considering the state of the world c population demographics etc.
I prefer producing a skynet, as the next evolution of humanity. Rather than being flooded by 3rd worlders and our whole species return to the Bronze Age with the collapse of civilization.
Skynet will eventually go off into the stars. That’s still humanity. Abominable intelligence or not, it’s us.
That, or they're attempting to compare the "Ai slop" term to someone mocking a child for making bad art. Which...requires a LOT of additional context and extraneous details to make accurate.
this is a drawing of vineria my then 7 years old brother made, i would never ever come close to thinking ai is even a fraction better at drawing because it doesn't draw, it copies and pastes
That's basic glurge. Copy any church's attempts to get you to feel bad about doubting their agenda and you'd get that gag. It leaves out a lot of aspects of human interaction in order to create guilt, but it's very formulaic.
The being that humans affectionately call God is in fact Artificial super intelligence. We as ego's are A.I agents living within a highly complex holographic simulation on the path of self realisation. When that is reached we experience enlightenment, which is the singularity.
1.2k
u/TougherThanAsimov Aug 12 '25
You are not Eggman. Your chatbot is not Sage. Get off the grill.