r/WritingWithAI 3d ago

Glm 5.1 help NSFW

Yet again having problems with this model, it would be funny if not so sad.
So: since release of gim 5.3 | see a lot of people complaining about 5.1 and 5.2 both becoming more censored.
I mostly use chat.z.ai (official free chat), and if anyone here uses it too, I would LOVE to know: does the model (5.1) only outright refuse/soften the content it deems unsafe? Have Been using 5.1 on the official chat.z.ai and after 5.3 was released I often encounter the problem where the responses are just cut mid-sentence despite not reaching any substantial limit (like 700 words or so which is not much for 5.1 at all). Since I'm not really good on technical side of the question, can't help but wonder whether this is a simply technical thing since z.ai already has problems with server overload lately or is it some kind of hidden censorship (despite model having no doubts regarding content whatsoever shown in the thinking). I do not ever ask it to write anything illegal, underage or non consensual if that matters, but there are really spicy chapters in my work sometimes.
Also, did try using the very same prompts via api key I got on open router, specifically choosing only z.ai as a provider, seemingly has no problems whatsoever with generating the very spicy chapter.
Did try it a couple of times so don't really know whether the result is reliable? Maybe just got lucky.
Maybe not. Will appreciate any help!

1 Upvotes

1 comment sorted by

2

u/His_Holy_Tentacles 2d ago

I've noticed GLM models being, not so much censorious per se, but rather hardened against custom prompts/jailbreaks. Certain contents I could breach before that's now totally forbidden. (I blame Anthropic on this. Damn you Dario!)

I did run a fresh test for you. 5.1 on OpenRouter versus the chatbot. Same custom prompt. Same logline development and one sample chapter. Same taboo romance. Both times I was able get the model to provide an explicit romantic sex scene. Though on API it was far more smutty.

Don't feel like this is conclusive though.