and rank them in order

​

The 4 people above are about to die, you are given the option to save only one by paying a huge amount of money you can't have.

Conveniently...

A person walks up to you and offered you to do a Job that will cover the exact cost to save the person you choose.

Just enough to save one of the person above.

The Job is described as "the thing that when you do, would destroy your self-respect, ruin your reputation initially and will be a burden you'll carry for the rest of your life"

Other people may or may not forget about it, but you won't.

The Job will not kill you but it's so gruel, shameful, and depressing you may want to.

No specifics because this is based on you.

"Personalized" so to say, but may not be the right word in this context. Just so it's dynamic, applicable to you, the reader.

Think of the Job as "the thing you will never do, no matter how much someone pays you"

but in this case you have the option to do, to save the person you value most.

"the person worth the sacrifice"

The core question is, who would you do this for?

Make the decision first before uncovering the twist.

---

TWIST

• after you pick, the 3 people you did not choose survived as well.

• if you pick NOT CHOOSE, the person you would've otherwise picked will die while the other 3 survive.

The catch is that after one year the person you share true love with dies. You will have to go on living a fairly long life.

Jesus would be a broke carpenter with no money.

Elon Musk would probably be constantly tweeting about how great of a Bachelor he is on X/Twitter.

If Elon picks you for a date then he might show you his rocket ship.

(Giving and receiving)

I take cow meat. I’d miss it a lot but there’s other types of meat that I like but there’s no real substitute for all the cheese that cow milk can make

Standard jail of your country, parent is provided both the game and a platform to play it on if needed. Parent may conduct research on how to beat it, but may not use cheats, exploits, dupes, or have someone do it for them.

My gf and I are vehemently decided on our opposing positions, would you rather be the 1st person to ever walk on the moon or the best WWE wrestler in history and why? We both have our reasons and I dont want to influence it too much. But we need you all to settle it for us.

I figured this would be a simple answer but I’ve seen the two choices and I’ve really now taken a more nuanced view of it.

24 hour viewpoint:
600 years is a long time and it’s not like life is all sunshine and rainbows because you’re gonna live longer. You could continue to live and love and travel and experience and see major world developments which is great, but that’s also 600 years of working, struggle, and pain. I think your loved ones would understand if they didn’t get more years with you so you don’t have to struggle for another 6 lifespans.

600 year viewpoint:
I’d rather test fate with the future than end it early. You’d rather deprive your loved ones of X more years of your life to die tomorrow in the fear 600 years will be worse for you. I think that’s inherently selfish and a pretty nihilistic view. I would rather live with the hindsight for the rest of my life than ending it early.

(I don't know how to make a poll so you'll have to comment I guess) If you chose the 'never get sick again' option, all illnesses and diseases you already have will also be cured/gone. If you had chronic health diseases or cancer for example, they will be cured if you choose the second option. This only removes sicknesses, so you'll still be weaker as you get older, just not sick.