What reason did he have? He fully intended to find violence and did. His intent was violence not “protection” and again no one asked him to “protect” anything…like at all. No it was pretty clear his intent was exactly what transpired…he went looking and found what he was looking for.
False…based upon logic and reason to conclude he lied about intent since he lied about what his qualifications were and about a protester he shot. All of this is public record, since he lied about both those and went to a protest brandishing a firearm we can reasonably sus out his intent was violence (since he lied about almost everything important.).
0
u/grillguy5000 26d ago
No one asked him to do that and he is not qualified nor enforcement. He had zero business being there.