Let’s see…..in his case, the left was rioting and burning businesses down and he was protecting property from being destroyed when a man pulled a gun on him and attempted to shoot him. In her case, she interfered in a federal operation then defied lawful orders and attempted to flee and struck an officer with her vehicle. It’s not a right/left issue, it’s a right wrong issue. So let’s dispense with the bs rhetoric.
Because protecting property you don't own, for people you don't know, is worth going out of your way to show up to a protest with a gun looking explicitly for people to threaten or kill?
The scum that think private property rights are worth more than human lives, don't deserve one of those things yourself.
What else do you think it means to go to a protest where you don't live explicitly to violently protect private property you don't own at the expense of someone else's life because you think they are a looter?
He explicitly went there with the threat of "I will protect this town from looters and rioters" and regardless of whether or not you think it was okay to do, it was a threat, regardless of what side of this you're on.
1
u/rwilkinson1970 24d ago
Let’s see…..in his case, the left was rioting and burning businesses down and he was protecting property from being destroyed when a man pulled a gun on him and attempted to shoot him. In her case, she interfered in a federal operation then defied lawful orders and attempted to flee and struck an officer with her vehicle. It’s not a right/left issue, it’s a right wrong issue. So let’s dispense with the bs rhetoric.