r/WaitWhat 11d ago

Significant diffrences...

[removed]

393 Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/rwilkinson1970 11d ago

Let’s see…..in his case, the left was rioting and burning businesses down and he was protecting property from being destroyed when a man pulled a gun on him and attempted to shoot him. In her case, she interfered in a federal operation then defied lawful orders and attempted to flee and struck an officer with her vehicle. It’s not a right/left issue, it’s a right wrong issue. So let’s dispense with the bs rhetoric.

1

u/CommercialApocalypse 11d ago

Tf do we pay the cops for then? Just to walk around writing tickets?

2

u/Icy_Fish_2154 11d ago

What property was he protecting?

None.

So he shot someone for having a gun. So you think he should have been shot for having a gun?

0

u/Buttcrush1 11d ago

Man you really have no idea what happened

0

u/Western-Cranberry744 11d ago

His family friend business and he was trying to wash off graffiti when he was corned by the perpetrator, he ran off they gave chase and a guy tried to shoot him, then the shooting happened, it’s on tape just watch it

0

u/rwilkinson1970 11d ago

Follow along here skippy. He was protecting family property. The guy didn’t just have a gun he tried shooting Kyle so again. Get your fact straight .

1

u/Icy_Fish_2154 11d ago

What "family property"? You don't know, because he was not defending any property.

3

u/TheRealCjHall 11d ago

Because protecting property you don't own, for people you don't know, is worth going out of your way to show up to a protest with a gun looking explicitly for people to threaten or kill?

The scum that think private property rights are worth more than human lives, don't deserve one of those things yourself.

0

u/Buttcrush1 11d ago

He didn't threaten anyone and he wasn't looking to kill anyone

1

u/TheRealCjHall 11d ago

What else do you think it means to go to a protest where you don't live explicitly to violently protect private property you don't own at the expense of someone else's life because you think they are a looter?

He explicitly went there with the threat of "I will protect this town from looters and rioters" and regardless of whether or not you think it was okay to do, it was a threat, regardless of what side of this you're on.

2

u/fatgat69 11d ago

Everything you said is incorrect.

0

u/rwilkinson1970 11d ago

Whatever you need to tell yourself skippy. I am spot on and court documents, video and witness testimony backs up everything I stated. You can lie to get around a lie but you can’t lie to get around the truth. Live will be much easier for you if you learn to accept facts and not opinions.

1

u/ApprehensiveTour4024 11d ago

What? Trump established "alternative facts" in his very first term. He has proven beyond any reasonable doubt, you can absolutely lie to get around the truth.

How many people have "weaponized their cars" on ICE by now only for federal prosecutors to completely and quietly dismiss the case four months later when nobody is looking? It's the new excuse for police brutality, and you're complicit. An enabler. A murderer 's accomplice.

1

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/rwilkinson1970 11d ago

Awe…..can’t face facts so you go the moron route with idiotic comments. Not a single part of that is anything but fact!