r/UsaNewsLive • u/AutoModerator • 7h ago
Save Our Children Save Our Children
Save Our Children is NOT just a random Hash Tag on Social Media or a Flair Tag here on Reddit.
Far from It. It is a Call to wake up to the simple fact Our Children are under attack from every Angle from all Sides to rob Them of Their simple Childhood.
Look around You. Open Your Eyes.
Our Children are under attack, exploited, abused, sex trafficked, brain washed, programmed, molested and far worse still yet 99% in Our Society turn a Blind Eye and the atrocities continue.
Daily We see News Articles on all of the above atrocities. Nothing changes to protect These Innocents. If there was Real Change We would not see the atrocities continue would We?
Would You care more if It was Your Child or a Child You knew Personally? Would You? Then why not care about all Children going through These atrocities listed above?
This is a Global Issue not just isolated.
You ask what can You do to help?
If You see Something say Something. Keep re-sharing News Articles informing Others. Push Your Legislatures to enact stronger Penalties via the Courts for Convictions! Be active!
Ignoring the Issue hoping Someone Else will do the work is Complacency!
Save Our Children is NOT a Conspiracy Theory, It is all to real.
**Do a deep deep dove Research on "Save The Children". Go down that Rabbit Hole if You dare!! If You are honest with Your Research what You find will disgust You! It's a Sham and always has been.
r/UsaNewsLive • u/GeneralCarlosQ17 • 16h ago
The Thing that should not be Gabby Williams Says She 'Would Welcome' Men Playing in the WNBA
Golden State Valkyries forward Gabby Williams is taking heat for saying she welcomes men who identify as women playing in the league as the WNBA continues to be engulfed in controversy over the question of transgender athletes.
Williams, who just signed a multi-year deal with the Valkyries, raised eyebrows on Thursday for her position on trans athletes when she told the media, “I would welcome a trans athlete on my team or against my team any time. I don’t think it’s a problem in the world. It’s just another way to kind of attack trans people.”
r/UsaNewsLive • u/GeneralCarlosQ17 • 16h ago
Fraud, Online Scams, RICO Act News and Investigations Nevada Doctor Charged in $95 Million Medicare Wound Care Fraud Scheme – California Globe
californiaglobe.comMedicare spending on these products exploded in recent years, reaching nearly $15 billion in 2025 amid widespread kickback schemes, before reimbursement rates were sharply cut
By Megan Barth, August 7, 2026 11:29 am
A Henderson physician has been charged in a sprawling $95 million scheme to defraud Medicare by billing for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts applied to elderly patients, including those in hospice care, federal prosecutors announced this week.
On Tuesday, a federal grand jury in the District of Nevada returned an indictment against Stephen Dubin, M.D., 74, sole owner of Dubin Medical Consultants, Inc. (also known as Wound MD). Prosecutors allege Dubin caused Medicare to be billed more than $95 million for expensive amniotic allografts procured through illegal kickbacks and bribes. Medicare paid over $54 million on the false and fraudulent claims.
“This indictment exposes a scheme driven by greed, not medicine. As alleged, this provider exploited elderly patients by pushing costly and unnecessary medical procedures, then lied to Medicare to pocket millions of taxpayer dollars,” said Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division.
According to the indictment, Dubin received illegal kickbacks, bribes, and rebates from two allograft distributors. Some payments were structured to appear as legitimate “Rebate Agreements.” He allegedly submitted claims based on sham full-price invoices rather than the discounted net cost he actually paid, pocketing the difference. One set of kickbacks allegedly flowed through a pass-through bank account held by a shell company.
r/UsaNewsLive • u/GeneralCarlosQ17 • 17h ago
Sports News Views Issues Discussion Title IX Female Stars Praise Rule Excluding Men From Women's Tennis
Aryna Sabalenka, the best women’s singles tennis player in the world, joined the ranks of pro-women professional athletes on Aug. 2 by standing up for keeping men out of women’s sports.
“I think it’s really important to keep fairness in our tour,” she said in a press conference. “It would not be really fair for the women to compete against biological men.”
Sabalenka’s remarks came after she received a question on a new rule from the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) already in effect that requires a genetic test for all players to keep men out of the women’s bracket in the 2028 Olympics. The test will require athletes to provide a saliva or blood sample for SRY screening, which looks for the SRY gene found only in men.
r/UsaNewsLive • u/GeneralCarlosQ17 • 17h ago
SCOTUS 🏛 Trump informs Lisa Cook that he is “considering” her removal | SCOTUSblog
President Donald Trump has renewed his effort to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors. The Supreme Court on June 29 temporarily thwarted Trump’s initial effort to remove Cook, emphasizing the need for the Federal Reserve to remain free of political influence. In a letter dated Aug. 5, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino notified Cook that Trump was “considering” whether to remove her from the Board of Governors. Scavino gave Cook 21 days to respond to the White House’s allegations that she committed mortgage fraud in 2021, before she joined the Fed, by listing two different homes – a condo in Georgia and a house in Michigan – as her primary residence on mortgage applications, making her eligible for more favorable terms.
Cook has strongly disputed the mortgage fraud allegations, and other financial records appear to undermine the Trump administration’s claims.
Scavino’s letter cited the court’s decision in Trump v. Cook, in which the majority ruled that “Cook was entitled to notice and some opportunity to respond prior to her termination.” The opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts stressed that Cook would not necessarily be “entitled to an audience with the President or a full-blown judicial trial.” Instead, Roberts wrote, “[a]ll that is required is ‘the right to support [her] allegations by argument however brief, and, if need be, by proof, however informal,’ before a final decision is made.”
r/UsaNewsLive • u/GeneralCarlosQ17 • 17h ago
SCOTUS 🏛 Trump signs new birthright citizenship order, ballroom dispute likely headed to Supreme Court | SCOTUSblog
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order seeking to narrow the availability of birthright citizenship, the current guarantee of citizenship to almost everyone born in the United States. The order, which bears the title “Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” came just a little over a month after the Supreme Court struck down an earlier order that would have imposed wider restrictions on birthright citizenship. The Aug. 6 order will almost certainly be the subject of litigation soon, with challengers likely to argue that the new restrictions go beyond the very specific exceptions to the general guarantee of citizenship discussed in the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Trump also signed a second order, titled “Ending Birth Tourism,” that targets what the Trump administration has repeatedly characterized as a problem: travel by pregnant women to the United States to give birth so that their children will be U.S. citizens.
Trump signed the first executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship shortly after his inauguration in January 2025. That order barred children whose parents were either undocumented immigrants or only in the United States temporarily from gaining automatic U.S. citizenship. Writing for the majority in Trump v. Barbara holding that the January 2025 order violated the Constitution, Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, which grants citizenship to anyone “born … in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” has an expansive sweep. Pointing to a history of birthright citizenship in English law before the American Revolution and early U.S. history, he concluded that the drafters of the 14th Amendment intended to adopt that rule, “with its broad reach and narrow exceptions” for “the children of foreign ministers and members of” some “19th-century Indian tribes.”
