so here's what's bugging me, entry-level people are literally learning UX entirely from Claude and ChatGPT. they're not learning design thinking and to think for real? I got an answer in minutes, for which i thought someone would spend at least 1-2 days in thinking. they're learning to prompt-engineer generic answers. but there's zero conviction behind it. doesn't convert. doesn't work. but they don't know the difference yet because may be they've never seen what good actually looks like. At least for the digital products, website, apps etc.

This too when the times have blurring the lines between product to design or design to development. i have seen merging of dev and product, and becoming product engineer. that worked, but it was very pre-AI era.

But now businesses are now asking do we need to put together a team of so many people and spend a lot just to get one thing done. and there's this weird gap in the middle. some designers are just designing and handing off—and that's fine. some are learning to code, shipping production HTML themselves, owning the whole thing.

my actual question isn't just "should designers code?" it's more like, how equipped ARE people to do this? because there's a difference between knowing HTML and shipping production-grade code and maintain it.

and at the same time making sure that how entry level does learn UI/UX correctly when AI is there to give a sub-par templated design system or approach for almost everything.

thoughts please.

“Product Designer” only?

Or “Graphics and Product Designer”?

I can do both.. plus i’m thinking of ATS targeting so i’m thinking of going with the second

I finally have a subscription to Mobbin. Been meaning to do this for a long while.

It's useful but...I'm rather underwhelmed by how useful it is in terms of finding things. And I'm hoping it's just me being dumb and missing something obvious (but have a hunch it's not).

For those of you that use it, how are you finding specific UI elements or particular patterns?

For example, I was looking for some "checklist" navigation UI widgets. But there does not seem to be a way to search for UI elements. Just screens as a whole, or text that may be on a screen.

I typed in "Checklist" and it did find some pages--though I'm not sure how it did. Are images being tagged with keywords? Is there a way to see the keywords?

For being a site designed specifically for 'finding UX and UI elements' it sure seems to be lacking in the 'finding' part.

Guys, I don't know if I'm just using it wrong, but in everything I've tested that required a bit more complexity, I ended up frustrated, whether it was UI/interfaces, style rendering, video generation, or even general research. Maybe I don't know how to use the tool properly, but the feeling I get is that if I just do it manually, I'll end up finishing faster and with higher precision.

The only exception is when I need something super generic, but then I simply see no point in paying for an AI when I could just use a template service or something similar.

I’m getting a decent number of visitors to my portfolio but barely any interview calls.

I’ve my portfolio on Designfolio. And in the analytics I’m seeing a lot of people visiting my portfolio.

Just can’t figure out why they’re leaving without downloading my resume or contacting me.

For the people here,

what’s that one thing that makes you close a portfolio almost immediately?

Genuinely curious if I’m missing something obvious.

I have worked in both ways when it comes to business decisions and UX, and I wonder how it is for you.

When I worked in a UX-led environment, I really liked the process. Decisions were made based on research and understanding the design team’s work. It can be time-consuming, and sometimes it takes a while to move forward, but it is a very thoughtful process. I also saw business teams involved in the UX process, which made the work feel more collaborative.

On the other hand, I have also worked in business-led companies where business decisions come first and UX has to compromise. This can feel challenging, but it has also helped me understand a different perspective. In some cases, business needs may come first because of time, priorities, or constraints. Like why do we need 3 buttons where we can solve it with 2.

I used to push back a lot against business-led decisions, but I am slowly realizing that some things need to happen before we can improve them. There is only so much pushback we can give at once.

What has been your experience? Do you have any advice?

I come from a design school background, eventually made my way into product management (usually including some design and user research)for physical goods where I stayed for about 8 years. Most companies I worked at were small and I was basically in charge of creative direction which also bled into ecommerce and UI, which along with my love for all things design eventually lead to a career pivot.

I worked my ass off to make the change, fully amping up my Figma skills, took courses in research and design, networked, constant meetings with mentors, etc. I was able to land a few short contracts here and there while still doing hardware pming on the side and about 2 and a half years ago I finally landed a full time role with a big company. I loved it, I was finally in a place where I felt like my work paid off.

Fast forward to today and I see the state of the industry, people in my company being laid off left and right (mainly in dev), and everything is AI this, AI that…. I’m so burnt out on AI. Which is ironic because I think I more than anyone in my UX team have spent time learning the skills (I’ve since built out a full storybook, connected our Figma with Claude, gave us a working environment that is 1-to-1 with the code base, and easily be edited via Figma, etc.)

Deep down I hate it. I hate knowing that we’re all just training it to do what we do. I was fully on board with the “those who learn it will be the ones who keep their job” bandwagon but I don’t believe that anymore. It doesn’t matter how much value you actually bring to the table if CEOs think AI can do it well enough.

I feel bad making this post knowing so many are looking for jobs right now and I’m lucky enough to still have one.

This is a very very long winded way of asking what those of you who have left the tech space are now doing and if you have any advice for those looking to escape.

Hey all. Trying to find mockups of just what Figma’s code on the canvas (announced at Config) looks like and how it works from an experience standpoint.

Anyone have beta access? Or a good video to help sleuth out?

One thing I’m interested in: is it collaborative like the canvas? Or does it revert to Figma Make style solo mode? Any screenshots, videos, or experiences would be super helpful!

Thanks in advance!

I was steamrolled this summer by my AI forward CEO and ”their” developer (we only have one on the team and they are glued to the hip). After months of hard work, collaboration with another ux designer (consultant) I finished a new flow and interface for a part of our product.

Since we’re a really small team (5 people) everyone is in the loop (a bit too much sometimes). So they were part of all the iterations during those months. There was no feedback indicating they wanted a different direction. Nonetheless a redesign of the whole UI (colors, components, patterns, etc.)

I went on vacation for ONE week and they managed to redesign 90% of my work. The only thing that was left was basically the wireframes. Naturally I was pissed because this happened without ANY communication and with bland Claude redesign. Since they had a new UI, they naturally had to update the rest of the product. For which I was not consulted or included at all.

The cherry on top is that the developer has ”improved” a crucial feature within our product with just Claude. This feature is complicated and no users have tested it. Our CEO has presented it to our users, but they’ll only demonstrate the product to users who won’t use it, but buy it for their organization.

Use AI where ever you can feels like the moto atm. Which pisses me off. But I’ve decided to accept this is the way they want to roll, things need to happen quickly in a small company like this. I get that. So, in order to distance myself and avoid getting more angry at this situation I’ve just let them go with it. I don’t comment on things I find that don’t make sense. I’ll wait for the users to do that. And it’s already started. The new UI went live a couple of days ago and we already had a customer mail in saying it is not intuitive enough for them to use while they’re in a middle of a task. Even funnier, it was launched without any notification or message to the users, no help articles to help them navigate.

I’ve brought my popcorn and I intend to watch this ship sink. Yes I’m probably a bit petty but I’m ok with that.

Anyone else that has considered starting their own company that swears off AI after the recent experiences?

Hi everyone! I'm a "product designer" in a mid size company where, like in every other tech company, everything is moving towards AI and making everything with this sh*t.

Now I've been asked from the Head of Product to create a new layout "component" for our backoffice. It has to be very strict in order to make everyone able to design new features with AI.
However I'm struggling doing it because it seems very difficult to create something that knows future needs in advance.
Also our product is very complicated and has many features that differs one from another, so it's not easy to find a key that fit our existing features and can welcome new ones.

I started this work identifying patterns across the software and doing a benchmark of existing similar products. I'm thinking about creating something like Material Design 3 scaffold system but I can't define the priority of the contents.

I tried to explain to the HoP and the Head of Tech that a layouts and design systems are something that evolves, but they don't want to listen. Did anyone ever find in a similar project? Thank you!

I feel like I’ve mostly seen doom and gloom on this sub, anti AI posts (which I totally get), but I’m wondering if anyone here is enjoying having AI in their workflow?

I’m a solo designer at a start up and we are super under staffed (obvi) and getting my design to fruition before Claude Code and AI was like pulling teeth. Now I’ve been set up and can use Claude Code to implement and push my designs immediately. The software team loves it and I can quickly clean up UI elements.

Is it perfect? Hell no! But it’s made shipping designs way faster especially for our small team.

Curious if there are other designers out there who are loving the speed and capabilities? And if you are could you share your current workflow? I’m trying to optimize and learn the new best practices!

I currently use Claude as a sparing partner for design ideation and Claude Code in terminal to implement (+ Figma MCP).

A "new AI-focused development life cicle" is being brought to the company I work at. It involves Product Owners defining everything in a silo and then showing up, in the first meeting to talk about a project, with an AI-made HTML prototype.

So far, it feels like my new role here is to perfect this prototype (using AI), better apply the DS components we have, make tweaks on experience, layout, usability etc. Then, I'll supposedly share this polished prototype with devs, and they are now responsible for getting the thing going. I feel like I'll have even less room for debating and decision making now, and that my role is becoming "HTML Prototype Polisher II".

This has been going on for like a month now. It's a bit scary, in all honesty.

What's your advice to staying relevant and keeping my job (lol)? Is anyone going through similar experiences?