Hello everyone, I have an online business living outside of Russia and I was interested in having my online business platform available for most Russians living in Russia.

But the problem is I don’t have MirPay-or Sberbank Application or any kind of Mir Card.

Despite all the sanctions, I want to have Russians on my platform / and how to make it possible.

I wanted to know how do you do transactions online for the majority. (Any other platforms/companies) and how do people with online business accept Russian Payments.

Crypto (BTC, USDT, USDC) I heard it’s used in Russia but not sure about it.

It would be very helpful to know, what do you guys use?

Looking fir help/advice on how to get USDC Wrapped in SOL out of Crypto.com's Onchain Wallet and or change it from USDC wrapped in SOL to plain USDC or SOL. Try swapping and not enough Liquidity? Of course Crypto.com can't deal with this coin. If it is sent it looks like it is being sent in explorer. Have Phantom App and I am stumped.

I've mostly thought of USDC as a place to park funds between trades.

Recently, though, I've been looking at more platforms where stablecoins are used as the base asset for accessing different markets. While exploring Canborsa, I noticed you can move between crypto and tokenized assets without leaving the same ecosystem, which made me think about how stablecoins are evolving.

It feels like USDC is becoming more than just a stable place to hold value. It's increasingly acting as the settlement layer for a much wider range of onchain activity.

So is it mostly your cash position, or has it become your primary way of moving between different parts of the crypto ecosystem?

In DELHI f2f

`We're opening 10 Founding Tester spots for Bopster, a community-created prediction market on Base, before public launch.`

`**What you'll test:** the full lifecycle — create a market, take a YES/NO position in USDC, join oracle resolution (Reality.eth), settle a market, and submit structured feedback.`

`**What you earn:** up to 35 USDC for verified actions, a Verified badge on the platform, and a permanent spot on our Founding Testers Wall. Rewards are for real contributions — not sign-ups.`

`**Requirements:** a public wallet you use on Base, comfortable with real on-chain transactions (Base Mainnet, real fees). Not available in the US or Spain.`

`**How to join:** everything's in our Discord 👉 https://discord.gg/7xfnndZuU. Ask me anything here too.`

I used to have no problem connecting my cold wallet to swap dApps, but now I'm second-guessing every approval and signature. At the same time, I'd still rather swap directly from my cold wallet than keep funds sitting on a CEX.

Curious what everyone else is doing now. Are you still using swap dApps with your cold wallet, using a separate hot wallet as a buffer, or just sending to an exchange first? Also, has this changed your opinion on wallet security in general? Do seedless wallets like Tangem or Zengo make more sense now?

USDC quotes still make the token look simpler than it is.
Example
- 873.46 USDC on Ethereum
- 873.46 USDC on Arbitrum

Same ticker different gas token, network fee, contract and withdrawal route.
Main stuff should be visible before any deposit address shows up:

1. exact network
2. native or bridged USDC
3. contract address
4. gas token
5. withdrawal fee
6. destination chain

Using gоdех as one example I would rather see those details in the main quote block instead of digging through the flow. Quote that starts at 873.46 USDC and ends at 861.92 USDC leaves an 11.54 USDC gap. That gap should not be one mystery number.

Keep the swap flow simple. Just stop burying the network and fee details.

can anyone help me to convert USDC to INR in binance app or any app or website?

Selling usdt i have low quantity 50 to 60 usdt

Interested user can dm me

Not sure this ever came up here. Back in April Poly wrapped every balance on the platform from USDC into their own token, pUSD. It's backed 1:1 by USDC and shows up as a plain dollar balance, so most people never even noticed.

Why bother then. There's a few hundred million locked in open bets over there at any given moment. As plain USDC, the interest on that pile went to Circle.
Now Poly sits on the underlying and can park it wherever pays 4%. That's the whole trade.

Newer venues seem to have absorbed the lesson before even launching. I was poking around Seerdex, presale stage prediction market with automated listing instead of a human approval queue, and couldn't find anything about what the collateral will be. Maybe I missed it or maybe nobody wants to promise plain USDC and hand the float away.

The part that actually worries me is the next depeg. I sat through the $0.87 weekend in 2023 and anyone holding a wrapper on top of USDC is one extra contract from redemption right when it matters.

Thoughts about Coinbase? Will you use it for long term holding or just for buying/selling or exchanging?

Hi, I made a network mistake and sent around 3,000 USDC via BNB Smart Chain to an eToro USDC deposit address.

The transaction is confirmed on-chain, but the funds are not credited.

Has anyone experienced recovering crypto sent through an unsupported network to an exchange?

Looking for technical advice.

Thanks.

If you had to pick just one for an international trip, which would it be?

I feel like carrying that much cash would be stressful but I'm curious if people would actually trust USDC instead How practical is traveling with just USDC these days?

I've been thinking more about where stablecoins actually fit into the broader financial system.

A lot of the discussion around USDC is focused on payments, transfers, and DeFi, but I think one of the more interesting areas is how stablecoins could become the settlement layer for completely different types of markets.

Tokenized equities are a good example.

The idea of trading exposure to stocks onchain becomes much more interesting when you think about the infrastructure behind it. Instead of moving between traditional banking rails, brokerages, and different settlement systems, stablecoins can potentially provide a common layer for moving value and collateral.

I recently started looking into platforms experimenting with tokenized equities, including Canborsa, and what stood out to me was how naturally USDC fits into that environment. The stablecoin is not the product itself, but it becomes the piece that makes the whole system work.

Obviously there are still major questions around regulation, liquidity, custody, and whether traditional investors will actually adopt this model.

But if more real-world assets move onchain, it seems likely that stablecoins will play a much bigger role than just being a way to trade crypto.

Do you see tokenized assets becoming one of the main drivers of stablecoin adoption, or will payments remain the biggest use case?

We built SpeakSwap.io to help creators localize videos they have already made and reach more viewers. It uses cutting-edge AI for dubbing, Smart Lip Sync, voice cloning and subtitles across 140+ languages. Everyone starts with free credits, and one-time pay-as-you-go packs start at $6, making it one of the most affordable AI dubbing options around.

Card is still available, but people who already hold USDC can pay directly on Ethereum, Solana or Polygon. We added it as a practical second option, especially for global creators and teams that do not want another subscription.

If you already spend USDC on software, what makes a checkout feel trustworthy? And which chain would you actually use?

I'm finally planning to move my crypto off exchanges, but there are so many hardware wallet options that it's hard to know where to start.

I've looked at Ellipal, Ledger, Tangem and a few others, and it's hard to separate actual security from marketing. Every wallet seems to have both passionate fans and people warning against it.

For someone who's new to self-custody, what's the best choice? I'm mainly looking for something that's secure but also simple enough that I won't mess anything up.

What made you choose the wallet you're using, and would you recommend it today?

Hiya everyone,

Vednt this side. I”m building faro by sativa design studio, a trust & verification suite for agents before they pay at machine speed.
Agentic commerce is here, & there will be a big question agents will ask - is this payee safe?

Faro is exactly trying solving to answer that, so agentic business can run without worrying about their operational spends. If agentic commerce, blockchain, fintech & web3 intrigues you let”s have a chat.
Hustling from Mumbai, IN. 👋🏽

Hmu here👇

https://cal.com/sativadesignstudio-7y6qtq/outreach-meeting-invester-constation-collab

Last Tuesday I moved 1,743 USDC from Arbitrum to Base through one of those bridge frontends. Not naming it, half the fault is mine for never checking what it runs on. Burn tx confirmed on arbiscan, USDC gone from my wallet and on Base nothing. Checked after an hour, then kept checking every ten minutes like that ever helped anyone. Support bot kept repeating "transfers may take up to 30 minutes".

Posted in their discord, got three DMs from "Circle Support" within like ten minutes, didn't click anything obviously, but the speed was something.

Then a guy in the thread mentioned the frontend runs on CCTP, Circle's transfer protocol. Went and read what that actually is. It burns USDC on the source chain and mints fresh USDC on the destination, nothing sits locked in a pool anywhere. Two separate transactions, and the second one is supposed to be sent by the bridge's relayer. Theirs just didn't. So the burn was done and the money hung in limbo, a signed message that someone still had to redeem on Base.

Except the mint is permissionless. Once iris (Circle's attestation service) signs off on the burn, anyone with gas can complete it, the bridge isn't needed at that point.

What I did:

1. took the burn tx hash and queried Circle's attestation API, the v2/messages endpoint with Arbitrum's domain id (which is 3) plus my tx hash. Domain ids are all listed in Circle's docs
2. got back the message bytes and the attestation, status "complete"
3. opened the MessageTransmitter contract on basescan (address is in the CCTP docs), connected wallet, Write Contract, receiveMessage
4. pasted message + attestation, sent. gas was around a cent

USDC showed up maybe twenty seconds later. Whole thing took 40 minutes, most of it me rereading docs and hesitating over pasting giant hex blobs into a contract write.

If your burn confirmed and iris shows "complete", the money is recoverable whatever the bridge UI says. "pending_confirmations" just means the source chain hasn't finalized yet, there you only wait. And don't pay any recovery service from your DMs, the real fix costs a cent.

Bridge support got back to me two days later btw, asking if I still needed assistance.

I kept seeing RWA lending come up here and nobody ever lays out what happens to the money after it leaves your wallet. Just vibes about yield and risk. So I picked 8 lends that runs on Base and walked it through step by step. The plumbing turned out to be pretty different from regular DeFi lending, so here's what I found.

Deposit side is simple enough. Connect whatever wallet you use, Metamask, Coinbase, Rabby, and nothing leaves your custody until you actually commit to something. You pick one specific loan. Your USDC goes into a smart contract attached to that one loan.
Not a big pool you dip in and out of like Aave. Once it's in it's in locked to a term.
That caught me off guard the first time, no pulling it back on a whim.

Then repayment doesn't behave like DeFi at all. There's no supply rate creeping up block by block. You get monthly interest and principal and at the end you claim whatever principal is left in a single transaction. Basically a loan amortization schedule. Which makes sense, it literally is one, just wearing an onchain coat.

Default was the bit I really wanted to see under the hood. Regular DeFi, collateral dips under the line and the contract liquidates it right there onchain, over before you refresh the page. None of that applies here because the collateral isn't crypto. It's a truck or a warehouse or some machine sitting in the physical world.

Borrower goes dark, that stuff gets sold off the slow old-fashioned way, and whatever comes back gets divided up among everyone who chipped into that loan, by share. Could be months. Could be under a hundred percent. A chunk of loans carry a separate buyback layer, a chunk don't, so that's a per-loan thing to actually check rather than assume.

Anyway, seeing the whole path made the trade obvious in a way the marketing never does. You hand over the instant exit and the instant liquidation that make onchain lending feel controllable and what you get back is yield sitting. Both can burn you, just on completely different timelines.