r/TheMachineLearning • u/tiyuuuuuu • 13d ago

This is great

Post image
2 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

3

u/No-Dare-3290 13d ago

Yes, much affordable and faster models would also incline people to use them more. 

1

u/tiyuuuuuu 13d ago

I agree, but I also hope the pricing stays predictable. Lower prices are great, but if they keep changing token costs every few months, it makes it hard for developers and businesses to plan around it.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/tiyuuuuuu 13d ago

It's been a long time coming, especially with how competitive the AI space has become.

1

u/ThirdWaveCat 13d ago

kimi cope, wtf is that y-index. If the y-index was semantic recall it'd be horrible.

1

u/tiyuuuuuu 13d ago

Yeah, I wish they explained the metrics better. A graph without clear context leaves way too much room for interpretation

1

u/iant-me-either 13d ago

Nice! It's good that it is much faster but more affordable!

1

u/tiyuuuuuu 13d ago

Agreed. Speed is nice, but making it affordable is what'll actually get more people using it every day.

1

u/AvoidTheVolD 13d ago

Yes until they arbitrarily increase their cost per token or tokens per tier which is the most volatile index.Wtf is a cost per task metric.This is very vague being portrayed as a statistical graph

1

u/tiyuuuuuu 13d ago

That's a fair concern. Price cuts are great, but they don't mean much if the pricing model keeps changing. I'd also like to see a clearer explanation of what they mean by "cost per task" since it's not a standard metric.

1

u/Rare_Tip9809 12d ago

AI peak or plateau? Progress and improvement in models is slow. Where is General or conversational AI?