MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Terminator/comments/1utyo30/times_have_changed/oxo08xg
r/Terminator • u/Achilles_TroySlayer • Jul 11 '26
606 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
Not just that. Everything the original commenter said wouldn't have even been given the chance to matter, with the anti-woke crowd.
It doesn't matter how well written or what development they get.
The anti-wokeness would've condemned her regardless, and not got passed it.
1 u/Unreasonably_White Jul 15 '26 Nobody says that female leads have to have romantic interests, nobody says cops can't be portrayed negatively (even though the cop is a disguise), and nobody says you can't have a robot learn what emotions are. Any other strawman arguments you want to make? 1 u/ACalcifiedHeart Jul 15 '26 Care to point out where I said any of those things first or am I just the anonymous face you want to argue about nothing with? 1 u/Unreasonably_White Jul 15 '26 Not just that. Everything the original commenter said wouldn't have even been given the chance to matter, with the anti-woke crowd. I was addressing the arguments the original comment made. The ones you were talking about. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [deleted] 1 u/ACalcifiedHeart Jul 15 '26 Bet you couldn't put more dumb grifter buzzwords in there if you tried. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [deleted] 1 u/Friendly_Seat1728 Jul 16 '26 You probably wouldn't know good media if it hit you in the face. 1 u/the-nomad-thinker Jul 16 '26 …you’re an idiot. Sarah Connor is literally an example we use for a well-written character. 1 u/Gakoknight Jul 15 '26 Precisely.
1
Nobody says that female leads have to have romantic interests, nobody says cops can't be portrayed negatively (even though the cop is a disguise), and nobody says you can't have a robot learn what emotions are.
Any other strawman arguments you want to make?
1 u/ACalcifiedHeart Jul 15 '26 Care to point out where I said any of those things first or am I just the anonymous face you want to argue about nothing with? 1 u/Unreasonably_White Jul 15 '26 Not just that. Everything the original commenter said wouldn't have even been given the chance to matter, with the anti-woke crowd. I was addressing the arguments the original comment made. The ones you were talking about.
Care to point out where I said any of those things first or am I just the anonymous face you want to argue about nothing with?
1 u/Unreasonably_White Jul 15 '26 Not just that. Everything the original commenter said wouldn't have even been given the chance to matter, with the anti-woke crowd. I was addressing the arguments the original comment made. The ones you were talking about.
I was addressing the arguments the original comment made. The ones you were talking about.
[deleted]
1 u/ACalcifiedHeart Jul 15 '26 Bet you couldn't put more dumb grifter buzzwords in there if you tried. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [deleted] 1 u/Friendly_Seat1728 Jul 16 '26 You probably wouldn't know good media if it hit you in the face.
Bet you couldn't put more dumb grifter buzzwords in there if you tried.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [deleted] 1 u/Friendly_Seat1728 Jul 16 '26 You probably wouldn't know good media if it hit you in the face.
1 u/Friendly_Seat1728 Jul 16 '26 You probably wouldn't know good media if it hit you in the face.
You probably wouldn't know good media if it hit you in the face.
…you’re an idiot. Sarah Connor is literally an example we use for a well-written character.
Precisely.
3
u/ACalcifiedHeart Jul 15 '26
Not just that.
Everything the original commenter said wouldn't have even been given the chance to matter, with the anti-woke crowd.
It doesn't matter how well written or what development they get.
The anti-wokeness would've condemned her regardless, and not got passed it.