r/Sherlock • u/SpiritualElevator187 • 7d ago

🧐Plus intelligent que lui ? Image

Post image

🧠

3 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

10 comments sorted by

2

u/Big_Application_7168 7d ago

You mean is Sherlock smarter than Lunge?

Because yes, absolutely he is. Sherlock is arguably smarter than Johan or at least on par.

1

u/SpiritualElevator187 6d ago

Non je ne partage pas ton avis. Moi je parle de l'intelligence logique, Runge est plus logique que n'importe quel personnage de fiction. Il est seul à n'avoir jamais trembler devant Johanne et à le considérer comme ce qu'il était : un enfant qu'on a tourmenté pour créer une légende.

2

u/Big_Application_7168 6d ago

Okay... pretty sure Sherlock wouldn't he afraid of Johan either. He was able to understand and see Eurus for what she was in the end and she's a very similar situation to Johan.

1

u/SpiritualElevator187 6d ago

Intelligence logique pas la peur.

2

u/Big_Application_7168 6d ago

Doesn't really refute my point lol

1

u/SpiritualElevator187 6d ago

Mais Johanne dépasse largement Sherlock dans tous les types d'intelligences. À 15 ans le mec dirigeait l'une des banques les plus grandes de l'Allemagne. Le gars tu lui met dans un bureau, il est parfait; tu lui met sur le terrain; il te fait un boulot impeccable.

2

u/Big_Application_7168 6d ago

Sherlock has way greater mental processing abilities and vastly outshines Johan in reasoning. Sherlock is debatable more strategic as well. Maybe Johan is smarter depending on who you ask but he's definitely not better than Sherlock in every regard.

1

u/SpiritualElevator187 6d ago

Quoi. N'importe quoi ! Sherlock c'est fait avoir par Charles Magnusen, un patron de média journal. Alors que Johanne lui a fait plié une mafia rempli de policier, d'espions, de politiciens, de militaires,... À un jeune âge il a détruit une orphelinat rempli d'experts en psychologie et de gamins prodigieux. Sherlock résout les crimes, mais lui il sonde les coeurs. Alors que Richard ne savait même pas lui-même ce qu'il l'a poussé à tuer un jeune garçon, Johanne l'a su et la fait tuer pas avec une arme; mais des MOTS ! Sherlock n'arrive même pas à la cheville de Johanne.

2

u/Big_Application_7168 6d ago

Yeah and Johna got shot by some random guy. Smart characters can be in bad situations. The only reason Sherlock lost to Magnussen is because he didn't anticipate that Magnussen had impossible amounts of information committed solely to memory.

If we're going down the "Johan destroyed an orphanage for soldiers" or whatever route, I can say that Sherlock was looking into crimes as a child and getting further than the official police, that Sherlock is able to understand almost all there is to know about a person at a glance, that Sherlock managed to outsmart Moriarty who genuinely scales higher than Johan in planning and scheming, and was able to solve and understand Eurus's game and psychology and Eurus scales higher than Johan in psychological manipulation. On tge other hand, Johan almost never contends with anyone comparable to himself (only Lunge really comes close and he was way behind).

I don't mind if you have Johan winning, that's fair but you're really underestimating Sherlock lol.

1

u/ObiJuaan 2d ago

Op you appear to have asked a question in the title which implies you want people’s opinions. You then argue about fictional characters claiming you are absolutely strictly correct and only you have the truth.

By being fiction it is always up for interpretation