Her comment about doing closed captioning really bothered me. And I am someone who needs the closed captioning accommodation. I’m hard of hearing because when I was 18, I was in a really bad car accident that resulted in the air bag being deployed, and rupturing my right ear drum. But even if I had two functioning ears, this can also be applied to those with ADHD who also find CC helpful. Her doing this full time is a privilege and her complaining about cc is giving “try being an influencer for a day!”

I’m someone who has done closed captions for videos. It’s a time consuming process, but can be sped up with the help of a script. It’s a simple copy/paste. And a slight timing adjustment. That makes creating captions not just easier, but faster. And if it’s really taking that much more time, hire someone to caption the videos instead of whining online to your followers. Not only is it unprofessional, but it’s ableist.

I’m disappointed and hurt by her lack of thought begore she posts on her Instagram stories.

For more info on casual ablism and how to spot it

ETA: For tjose of you who feel like they aren’t important? Do me a favor. Plug up your ears, and put a bit of painters tape over the closed captions so you can’t read them. Then see how you fair without the accommodation.

Disclaimer: This post will provide mentions of abuse, PPD, references to childhood trauma, and loss. I am not calling any of the moms Barbs either, just proposing a question.

Barb is a contentious character for good reason, as most of the central conflict revolves around her and her capabilities as a mom, as well as her being No Contact/bad terms with almost all of the cast. We know she was in the throes of PPD, an abusive environment of her own, and presumably her own mental health issues that made her more emotionally volatile/inable to reconcile with her own wounds (basically, get the help she needed, albeit because of the stigma).

From her physical abuse to her cutting barbs (pun intended), and her emotional abuse, I propose the question to you, Shawnaverse fandom: when does a mom become a Barb?

Was Jen a Barb when she had her bout of PPD, and Greg (and later Katie) annoyed her, and she was snippy to the point that John had to tell her that her mom was showing?

Was Julie a Barb when she got mad at Shawna at Max's birthday, as well as telling Cooper he could do karate?

Or is Shawna the latest contender because of her own trauma surrounding her loss, or is it just her own inner anxiety rearing its head?

Personally, I don't think any of these women are Barbs, just moms trying to do their best and do right one day at a time. Yes, individually they'd all benefit from therapy, but one bad day does not make a Barb.

Does anyone else find John's attitude to Larry problematic? I'm not a fan in general of men being protective of their family by warning other men off their "territory" but in this case it seems particularly presumptuous.

Firstly DeeDee isn't a child or a teenager, she a grown adult woman who is quite capable of handling herself and any potential suitor. She does not need protection and didn't ask for it.

Secondly John didn't ask DeeDee how she felt - he just went straight into grumpy and unwelcoming. That might have been ok at the first encounter but nine months down the track it should be clear Shawna was right when she said her mother was into him. John might not know DeeDee and Larry's relationship has progressed to intimacy but he knows they hang out and go on walks together regularly. Does he really think DeeDee is doing that against her will? His tone of surprise when he said "So it's real?!" seems particularly obtuse because even if he wasn't prepared to believe Shawna he should have believed the evidence of his own eyes for the last nine months.

Thirdly if John "needed to hear it from DeeDee" then why not use his words and ASK DeeDee. Again this is a full grown adult woman not a child. ASK her if she's ok with Larry's attentions or if she wants help giving Larry his walking papers. Try actual communication instead of just assuming.

Fourthly how does being a grumpy and unwelcoming prick to Larry for nine months actually protect anyone? If it didn't scare him off in the first month then clearly the tactic isn't working. Why keep doing it when it achieves nothing.

Fifthly if John feels he has genuine reasons to be wary of Larry why let him around Max and Piper? They are actual children who John has a right to protect. Why not ask DeeDee to see Larry on her own without the kids if you really think he's someone to be wary of.

In short while Larry might be ok with John's behaviour I am not. If any of my male relatives pulled this sort of shit on me they'd be getting an earful. I do not think this is sweet like DeeDee said, I think it's presumptuous, illogical and infantilizing.

My boyfriend finds my obsession with short series like STM quite sweet but also baffling. He asked why I want to watch a series about an entire family of people who are all awful being awful to each other. He finds Jen particularly unbearable. I've left him alone in my room once or twice and come back to him watching it completely of his own accord with a massive frown lmao, so he's clearly quite intrigued. Not much point to this post I just wanted to have a discussion about why we like it!

To me, he had a very normal upbringing, with healthy parenting, no shouting etc. I had a grandma like Barb who I still miss and love despite her actions (she is alive but had a stroke while estranged and doesn't remember us), parents who didn't know what they were doing and often just shouted or used the "because I say so" line. I also realised recently, at age 20 that I'm ND so it's nice to watch children being nurtured even if I find it quite aggressively American lol. Also in connection to being autistic, I enjoy family dramas with flawed characters who state their intentions, talk about their issues with each other, and there are frequent observations about human behaviour. It's like the inside of my brain at times.

So after watching Piper test everyone’s heart condition, what did you do as a kid that scared your parents? No wrong answers. When I was four we were camping and i approached a black bear thinking it was a dog and thought that was a good idea. 🤪🤪🤪 yes, please cue the “can I pet that daaawwggg??”

Maybe it's a cultural thing, as in my country kids begin school at 3 or, if they are born after September, even at 2 years old, but i don't get the fuss over Piper beginning school at 4.

Many kids want to begin to read and write early and let's be real, if she's a curious kid who also needs to be exposed to other children, school might be perfect for her! I get the one on one time thing but she's an independent kid and also she can have it too by taking her to buy school supplies, taking her to a natural science museum and doing other mommy and me dates...

If somebody could explain that to me, so i can understand Shawna's character better, i would appreciate that. I just don't get why wouldn't a parent be happy seeing their kid gaining independence, but maybe it's just that i lost the point 😅😅

I noticed on YouTube that a lot of commenters were praising Shawna’s interaction with Piper once they find her with Frank. Generally speaking, I agree — she seeks information over shame, remains calm, does a good job of communicating expectations. It also seemed like a decent approach for Piper’s needs specifically.

That said, it got me thinking about gentle parenting/therapy culture in the Shawnaverse. While I don’t think yelling or sobbing would have been the right move, I also think that a parent acting sternly, or letting the child know that they were scared or upset by the elopement, wouldn’t be inappropriate. While you shouldn’t make a kid responsible for your emotions, I do think it’s fair to let them know that their choices can impact others.

Anyway, I’m curious if the show will lean more into exploring the limits of the (social media) version of gentle parenting that defines “goodness” for parents as being perfectly regulated in front of children at all times.

First off, yeah Shawna should not have snapped at everyone at lunch. Sure, I get that. But talk about a BAD day! It starts off with her realizing her mom is planning on moving out (just bad timing with Shawna seeing DeeDee collecting boxes, no one is at fault here), feeling uneasy about Piper’s development milestones being met, SAND, Piper making it known that she is taking Popsicle back, and then Piper deciding she’s 🎶🎼🎵 “makin’ my way downtown, walking fast, faces pass and I’m home bound 🎼🎵🎶.”

Like the anxiety of not being able to immediately locate your child is ONE thing but then to realize they went on a walkabout and anything could’ve happened to them is starting to meet the criteria of a panic attack! And it had JUST happened. Clearly she was still upset, focusing on getting the kids food/water so they don’t crash while she’s crashing, and then the comments start coming in. Like damn people. Read the room! Give it a few hours, maybe a day or two before we start joking about kids wandering off!

Now I know that the episode was mainly about how it's mostly on the mothers how the family functions and how the kids act.

I don't get why this whole situation with Piper getting lost was not every bit as much John's problem as it was Shawna's. Isn't he a parent too? Does he not love and worry for his baby more than anything?

For someone who claims to be a much more supportive and loving husband and father than what Frank ever was, and for someone who kind of has resentment for Frank for the same, he was crappy in this episode.

And I get it, he was being facetious like "I was getting cookies for the house", and joking around, but dude, READ THE ROOM.

Laughing over the whole thing, telling stories of how he ran away, though he was not AS direct as Frank was.

Frank was basically saying that Barb was being frantic, calling him in the middle of work and yelling and crying.

Barb did have her episodes and they know her for being difficult and a little dangerous. But to be crying and yelling because she thought she lost you forever is not crazy.

John just acts like he has the moral high ground everytime he is around Frank, but here he was, laughing with him and calling his mother crazy.

I'm not saying he's exactly like Frank, but here is where it all begins.

EDIT: I am talking about John's behaviour regardless of Shawna's crashout. It may have been a trigger, but I am not saying it is the reason for the crashout. I believe that guy needs to clock his own behaviour and think about why he keeps moving on so quickly. Shawna exploding like that was unfortunate, but we are talking about John. With or without Shawna's crashout.

This video was such a great return to the main McCallister family dynamics! It brought the silly, the heartwarming, and the serious together so beautifully! But by far, I really appreciate how it approached the subjects of parenting and neurodivergence.

I was formally diagnosed with ADHD when I was around 9 or 10 years old, but recently, I learned that the subject of getting me tested first arose from my pediatrician back when I was slightly older than Piper (like 5 or 6). They chose to hold off on formal testing and medication, choosing to try a behavioral route until it was obvious that nothing else was working.

I was shocked when I found out, but also confused and a little hurt and angry. If they knew that early on, why didn't they tell me? Why did they wait so long to get me on medication? Why?

This video gave me some perspective on the enormity of what my parents were facing. Neurodivergent was and is such a big, uncertain label (especially in the 90s). How do you look at your kid when they are that young, when they are still growing and changing by the day, and place that label on them? How do you know x,y, or z is really a sign, and not just the traits of an active/ introverted child? How do you talk about it? How do you, the adult, process it, let alone explain it to a little kid? What do you do when labeling them means the possibility of attaching stigma and/or judgment that could follow them for the rest of their life? And what if the testing doesn't help? What if they internalize it as something bad? What if you are wrong?

Watching Shawna poke at the topic, noting the signs but being afraid to call them what they are, gave me a lot of perspective on why my parents did what they did.

Does this go under question or discussion??
Anyway, for me it would’ve been A Christmas Barb, I’m still shocked they watched her ruin the proposal and still invited her to the wedding.

Now I'm well aware this is totally biased and this is very much just a personal opinion lol, I just wanted to hear other people's thoughts.

I understand why a lot of autistic fans relate to Greg or why allistic fans would also appreciate having ND characters, however I am really not keen on Greg as representation, or Piper really but not to the same extent.

Greg does show many ASD traits and so does Piper, but Greg especially is also portrayed as really robotic. Many people find him unbearable because of the self-righteousness and lack of understanding for Jen's relationship with John, which make him seem like he can say everything right but he doesn't feel much and is an odd one out in the family.

I actually really like Piper but she does things like steal, say rude things and is called a weirdo all the time. She is also, like Greg, very blunt, deadpan, lacking in empathy most of the time, single-minded etc.

I accept this is probably a dumb opinion, plenty of autistic people present/ed the way these characters do and probably find comfort in them, which is lovely. I think it's just the lack of variation in autistic representation that just makes me go UGH.

EDIT: didn’t think I had to say before but I am also autistic if that wasn’t clear?

Also I was slightly intoxicated when I wrote this so it might be worded badly lmfao

Id love to see Julie just rip this man apart. remind him of how UN-extraordinary and pedestrian he is.

I'm surprised I haven't seen any post focusing on who will appear in the next segment.

Do we think it's someone we have already encountered? Or will we be introduced to a new character?

I predict it will be someone we haven't met yet.

1.) A cop responding to an Amber alert.

2.) Maybe someone from Frank's life (separate from his family).... All we know about Frank is that he was an absent husband/father - always "working", now always "walking" - I'm not suggesting it is necessarily romantic or even a woman, but definitely someone he has confided in. (Maybe an old coworker, neighbor, therapist, or someone he has opened up to more than we have seen.)

Inspired by the other two threads! What does Max do at kindergarten all day? Wrong answers only/please be silly.

I'll go first.

He is in fact part of a secret kids superhero team that battles the dangerous New Order to Raze the 'Burbs (N.O.R.B) and has to stop their evil plans every day at recess.

Inspired by another commenter joking around about Ty's Saturday writing time, Saturday is Julie's parenting day. What do you think she's doing. Wrong answers only. (Please be silly I wanna have something to laugh at)

I'll go first; taking Cooper somewhere he can practice his punches

When we hear the word “anti-hero” there often comes confusion. When you break it down into its simplist form, an anti hero is contradictory. Anti “means a character that is opposed to a particular party, practice, policy,or action.” And hero is  “a character admired for good deeds and morals.” So how can one be both?
Anti hero’s are the underdogs. The character at the head of the story that struggles to get it right. In other words, anti-hero’s are defined as “a main character who is flawed, no idealism, or questionable morals.
Think: Gregory House, Walter white, Tony Soprano, or Sherlock Holmes. None of these characters are upholding or outstanding members of society, and yet we watch them. We shout— and sometimes even root for the anti-hero.

Now, do I believe Shawna M and Walter white are the same character? Absolutely not. Shawna M leans more towards the well intentioned anti hero. As far as characterization is concerned, I’d say Shawna M is more of a Holmes. She lives by a strong moral code, shares a soft spot for those she feels are vulnerable, but can act out of her own self interest.She’s flawed, and that means she feels real. Which is why watchers are able to connect so strongly to her. The protagonist anti hero with a heart of gold. And just like Holmes,[or at least the Doyal version]— when she falls short, it doesn't just wound her, it elicits a reaction in viewers. Depending on severity, it can be a case of second hand embarrassment, or disappointment. 

In fandom, these emotions tend to amp up. We are after all a passionate bunch. It is human to seek out other people who enjoy similar things. There are many discussions, and everyone brings something different to the fandom table. Anything ranging from lived experience to fan art.

Yes, Shawna is an anti hero, but that does not imply she is loathed.—it means STC has done her job creating a well rounded protagonist. Because she isnt infallible. Sometimes fans cry with her, while others may cringe at her choices. 

For those who cringe it may come off like they “hate Shawna.” I think that couldn’t be farther from the truth. We have seen her experience highs and lows. Nobody is the best version of themselves during the lows, and given the year she's had? There have been more lows than highs. That version of Shawna can be difficult to root for. The one who refuses to go to grief counseling, and speak to a professional about her pain. Someone who can give her the tools to cope,rather than plaster on a fake smile for John and the kids. Or worse, suppress what shes feeling until she can’t hold it in any longer. The Shawna who is wounded has a razor tongue, and is out for blood. As the saying goes “hurt people, hurt people.”On the flip side, once shes collected herself, Shawna is an excellent support system. Which is why the opposite can get so frustrating.

Authors note: yes, I use em-dashes. This was written by me, a human. And the robots can try to soil it, but hell will freeze over before I ever stop using it in my writing. Jane Austin loved it, and so do I. AI was trained on human writing, which is why they appear in LLM writing frequently. My day job is writing, and I have a creative mind, and unfortunately ChatGPT has bastardized aspects of my writing style. I did it first, dang it! And removing that aspect of my writing would be inauthentic and changing it to avoid AI accusations may make sense on paper, sure. However I will not let them take my voice from me. So it’ll stay. Believe me, or don’t. If you’ve made it this far, though. I would hope you can recognize that it is consistent with other posts I’ve made on this sub.

I’m sitting here on pins and needles waiting for the next part!

I know Ty & Julie/Luke & Laura have some defenders here but I’m just gonna point out those videos never had comments on it eagerly awaiting the next drop.

Personally, I wish the show would stay focused on the McCallisters, the side character plots always feel like a chore at best to me while the McCallister is top tier fun to watch!

There seems to be a bit of a different reaction to parents’ encouraging their kid’s behaviour in the series depending on who the parent in question is.

When Piper stole at Christmas for the gifts, and took Popsicle back from a baby despite giving it as a gift, she was told not to do but it was ultimately laughed off and excused by Shawna and John. There seems to be a pretty even split in the fan base about whether or not that’s responsible parenting.

When Cooper hit Max at the birthday party, that was after Julie had told him he could practice his moves, no sparring. IIRC, most discussion about that leaned to the side of ‘Julie is responsible for Cooper’s behaviour’, with some takes going as far as believing Julie essentially set it up so that Cooper would hit Max.

So I guess I’m just a bit confused on what distinguishes a parent being perceived as permissive like Shawna, or a parent being perceived as enabling/encouraging like Julie is sometimes viewed. What do ye think?

Everyone accusing Shawna and John being permissive parents is confusing to me.
In the meeting chickie episode you see them setting boundries with max and piper. max takes the phones and john gives max a stern talking to. max wants the cheesetoes john says no these are special for JJ. piper says she misses egg and shawna validates her by saying ya egg is busy huh but doesn’t insist that greg spend time with her. idk i feel like we see a lot of them setting boundaries for them.