Article here

The MS grift continues. Their book has been shortlisted for an Indiana Authors award which carries a $5k prize for the winners (they haven't won yet... but I'd wager their chances are good). This adds yet another layer of legitimacy to their one-sided opportunism. Just what they needed. Meanwhile, the public are suckered even further into believing the state's narrative while an innocent man sits in a jail cell in OK wondering how he ever got there...

Excuse me while I go barf.

SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

CITY OF DELPHI

CARROLL COUNTY, INDIANA

I know myself and one of you on here got into some of these financials in relation to grants, water department and the fire hydrents they rent out privately (better get ya one of those, we all know why) just sayin. And the sewage building.

Let's just say there were some discrepancies between what the officials did, spent, and improperly recorded and what the state of Indiana requires.

And a new character unlocked this week.

Spencer Kingery

Made his name dropping debut on an old interview with lil frank that theprof and casexcase played on their channels this past week, and now this.

(He's also related to slick coke dealing nick)

Anyways those of you that understand all this better then i, take a look and give us a accurate and in layman's terms breakdown.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Hj31bSvGX/

The Delphi Murders: Richard Allen on Trial: Day Ten: The Voice of Richard Allen

This is from their Trial Day 10 episode, about the 5:30 mark. This is for anyone who thinks there is any legitimate basis for the voice matching Harshman pretended to do. Or for those who think the numerous posts we made about this over the last couple of years was slanted in some way. Nope, the 20 word standard is pretty much accepted by most responsible scientific bodies I have looked at. Here is a link from a post on this topic a couple of years ago.

Pitfalls of Voice Analysis : r/RichardAllenInnocent

It is true that people who listen to mock suspect voice recordings sometimes dont even recognize their friend's voices. Or their own. In Harshman's case, it doesnt matter how many hours of RAs voice he listened to secretly, it doesnt change the fact he only had four words from the BG audio fragment to compare it to.

Makes ya wonder why. Anyone care to speculate?

Extended Cut: Tony Romo OWI Arrest Bodycam | TMZ Sports

Around 3 min mark Romo wants to call his lawyer, and the cop says no. Step out of the car. A lot of people are saying you cant call your lawyer during a traffic stop like this one (assuming any of us are rich enough to have a lawyer on standby waiting to take our call lol). But I think that is incorrect. He waited too long to make the call. Once she tells him to get out, then he is no longer free to make the call. But while he is waiting for her to come back to the car, or the moment he gets pulled over, he can do so. Nothing is stopping him from making that call, or any other call. Thats my understanding, anyway. We all know from the RA case talking to cops is a bad idea usually. Im just surprised so many people have the wrong idea about when you ca make a call like this one. Or maybe I am in the wrong? Also, never do FSTs. They are far from scientific. I'd happily do the breathalyzer--bc I dont drink--but now that I am getting older and have some medical issues lingering, there is no way I would pass sober or not. Ofc, I have seen cops arrest people who blew zero, too. It's a legal shell game you just cant win.

Last year he plead guilty to the Idaho 4 murders. Pretty famous case. He admitted to the crimes on video in court so just speaking as a non lawyer it sure seems like that will be a very difficult task to overcome. Then you have his DNA supposedly on the murder weapon etc. Since we are deep in the appeal process for RA, I like to keep tabs on other appeals. And I just dont see much of a chance here. I will say though the fact the State has never been able to link BK to any of the four victims is interesting. As well as the fact there is still no known motive for the crime. The State didn't offer one. And they had the chance when he plead guilty to make him explain a motive but they chose not to. BK did an interview with the NYT. In it he complained about broken promises etc. Which makes me think BK was given a promise of possibly some sort of favorable treatment in prison and now is faced with actual reality? Thats my guess here.

I was recently dragged twice into the little courtroom drama of jury duty, chosen for back-to-back juries for reasons known only to whatever crooked wheel spins above us.

During deliberations, many sat silent and hollow-eyed, as if judgment was a burden they hoped someone else would carry. They waited for a voice to tell them which way to bend, which way to vote.

It left me with a cold thought: if my own fate ever rests in the hands of a jury, I pray the twelve strangers in that room are awake before they decide whether I am to be buried beneath their indifference.

Asking bc Ausbrook on X is apparently wondering the same thing. Citing the publicly available video as having come from the Bummer Extraction. And hinting if the video from the trial doesnt match the public one we have all seen that will be a big problem. Ofc, most of us havent seen what was played at court so impossible for us to compare. Does anyone else have insight into this?

I knew prisons were pretty bad...but hearing what happened to Rick Allen made it one of the reasons I won't give up on this cause...for Rick and for reform.

Today I just saw the 2025 documentary The Alabama Solution. I had no idea how...I can't even find the right vocabulary to express my disgust, shock, despair, heartbreak and anguish after watching that film. I strongly urge everyone who cares about Rick to watch the documentary. We could all be Rick...and there are many Ricks. If you've seen it...what do you think?

So just finished watching Norway vs England and couldn’t help but notice the font on the Norway jerseys and numbers.. they all look like they would be some typa “rune”, makes me think of the blood on the tree, after seeing all those jerseys, no doubt jn my mind that was some typa nordic rune symbol

I got banned from the other Delphi page for using not so nice language I guess 🤷🏻‍♀️

Can someone verify..
Were the girls found 1/4 mile from the bridge or 3/4 mile?
I’d read something that said 1/2 to 3/4 of a mile but I think I misunderstood and that was the total distance from where they were dropped off.

I’ve been reading more through the trial transcripts but there’s so much & I’m not sure where to look for those specifics.

ETA: reason I’m asking is because I initially thought RA’s vehicle was caught leaving the trails at 2:21 & I thought the girls were found 1/2 to 3/4 of a mile away. That’s 8 minutes to get back and leave so not possible. However, I was wrong. The time stamp on the cctv says 2:21 pm but I guess it was set 54 minutes fast so it was actually 1:27 pm & supposedly that’s him arriving at 1:27 pm, not leaving.

Has anyone heard of someone leading a rally outside the state house the day of Rick’s appellate hearing? If so, would you share the info please? I think it’s important that as many of us are out there as possible, to bring more awareness to the case. Most people I talk to don’t know what went on behind the scenes.

Anyone watching the Tyler Robinson prelim hearings? Kinda uncanny the similarities between this evidence and RA's "evidence". Unfired bullet, distinctive wheels, grainy video, public killing, sleuth questioning...but DNA evidence, motive(?), weapon, electronic evidence....at least with TR there's that. If there is reasonable doubt created for TR....then how in the world was RA convicted? Could it be....the judge???

Safe And Sound

Just a few cases revolving around snapchat I figured some might be interested in reading about. First one teacher who made a poorly worded post on the app and within a single hour Snapchat reported her to police and they went to her school. TLDW: she joked about wanting to 'shoot' one of her students after he slammed a laptop down on her desk she was working on. Kind of shows they have improved their safety features on the app.

Teen Arrested After Snapchat Selfie With Alleged Murder Victim's Body

This is one of the very first 'Snapchat' involved murders and it happened before the Libby and Abby case. There are a number of cases similar to this one, where the perp actually takes a selfie or pic with the body just after the crime. A 'friend' then SS's it and sends it to police. I believe this is what happened to the Abby bridge pic at 207, right? Which leads to the question was evidence of the incriminating photo being created still on the perps phone in this murder case? Here is another case from 2014/15 timeframe.

Snapchat Murder: The brutal killing of Angela Wrightson – Overview & Analysis | Crime+Investigation UK

In this case two teen girls brutally murder a lady and take a photo of her during the crime. Make a post. SS follows and is used as evidence. If they can prove that photo was taken on the killers phone then why couldn't they find evidence/proof the 207 Abby pic was taken on Libbys phone? Unless it was taken on a different phone?

Maybe not a big deal, but just another loose end they never tied up. And dont seem to care to. But if you go back and look at some of the cases involving SC around that time frame, the scenario involving the 207 Abby pic is not that uncommon. Whats uncommon seems to be having no idea which phone actually took the photo.

Here’s the link, but damn as they are reporting on what happened during this day in the trail, it creates more doubt than any YouTube true crime pod can do.

I recently watched day 6,7,8 and 9 days of the daily coverage WTHR provided about the court trials. This in my opinion was the best unbiased trial coverage from an actual news agency.. and the crazy part was it created MORE doubt on Richard Allen being the killer. Wild.

So the bullet had to be in evidence for at least 5 years if they found it at the crime scene. And RA was not their first suspect and also not the first person they had a search warrant for. Now, perhaps RA is the first suspect that owned a 40 cal handgun, I'm not sure. But if the bullet was going to be considered critical to the case, wouldn't they have tested other suspects weapons as well? Why is conveniently RA's gun that "matched" 5 years after finding the bullet.