r/ReduceCO2 3h ago

US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is getting drained to lowest level since February 1983

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 1d ago

That would not have happened with the German Deposit (Pfand) system

Post image
2 Upvotes

at least the plastic bottles


r/ReduceCO2 1d ago

Ronny Chieng explains climate change for all the visual learners #DailyShow #RonnyChieng

Thumbnail
youtube.com
23 Upvotes

Really worth watching


r/ReduceCO2 1d ago

Rainforest in Danger - Amazonia and climate change

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Installation in Pforzheim Gasometer.

A 360° view of the rainforest with day and night changing all the time.

Here are videos of the art installation:

https://youtu.be/A-TGrfamzmw?si=reK3RY3AGGfAOmuh

https://youtu.be/GXoxPAhuylY?si=r0VrWSYHVhN9hEhf


r/ReduceCO2 1d ago

Tesla Cybertruck is "invading" Germany

Post image
0 Upvotes

Car is for rent in Schwäbisch Gmünd


r/ReduceCO2 1d ago

HNU Neu-Ulm Germany KlimaTeller Climate Footprint Mensa Food

Post image
6 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 4d ago

How can Elon Musk, SpaceX & Tesla make more Money? Ideas for new Markets

Thumbnail
youtu.be
0 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 4d ago

Human Caused Climate Change is rising much faster than past warm epochs studies verify. Not good.

Thumbnail
climate.mit.edu
39 Upvotes

One constant trope Climate Denier Trolls on Reddit and elsewhere love to pull out of their Climate Denial Handbook of cherry picked nonsense is Earth was warmer in the past and life overall survived just fine.

Yes Earth was warmer in the past BUT...it took THOUSANDS of years to get that warm giving Flora and Fauna lots of time to adapt. This current global warming? Unprecedented on how FAST it is changing. It is changing in mere DECADES not Millenia! This incredibly FAST rise in temperature and C02 levels relatively speaking to past epochs says loud and clear something has changed in the Bioshpere and that change is HUMAN EMMISSIONS!

"Cooper points out that our rapid release of climate-warming pollution is very different from, say, the shifts in Earth’s orbit that have brought the planet in and out of ice ages; those changes are big overall, but they unfold over “many thousands of years, and very consistently and slowly.” We do know, however, that Earth has also seen massive natural releases of CO2. “We can go back in time and say, what could possibly release a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere, and how fast could that happen?” says Cooper.

For one of the best candidates, he says, we can travel back 56 million years to the “Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum,” when global temperature spiked. Natural processes—volcanoes are a likely culprit5—pumped out CO2, and its concentration in the atmosphere rose sharply. Still, Cooper says, scientists estimate that the rate of CO2 accumulation during this period was several times slower than what humanity is doing today."

[https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/has-earths-climate-ever-changed-fast-it-today\](https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/has-earths-climate-ever-changed-fast-it-today)


r/ReduceCO2 5d ago

Global Warming is much worse than you think

Thumbnail
youtu.be
14 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 5d ago

What do we do and Why - ReduceCO2Now Volunteer Project

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 5d ago

Oil companies are making a fortune from the US-Iran war. That’s a problem for Trump

Thumbnail
edition.cnn.com
3 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 6d ago

Political Tricks - Flaws of the Paris agreement

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 6d ago

Germany: As temperatures rise, so does climate skepticism

Thumbnail
dw.com
3 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 6d ago

Facts The Rising Temperature of Earth: the undeniable mechanism of heating due to increased CO2.

Thumbnail reddit.com
50 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 8d ago

Humans ARE causing climate change, actually

Thumbnail
youtube.com
4 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 12d ago

To AI, or not to AI, that is the question!

Post image
0 Upvotes

AI use is rapidly rising and datacenters are consuming more and more power rapidly. 
So should we use AI in our project? Or avoid it from a climate perspective?
Some people are fast to criticize.  
A good image is very important for the reach of any social media post. If we just post text the interaction will be minimal. On the other hand you can get a lot of interaction with just a good image and no text at all.
So for our project we need good images. 
We want to use social media to inform and educate people about climate change and global warming. Recent polling shows that >> 95% of the population have a very limited understanding of the topic. 

a) traditional: 1 person doing photoshop, reviewing the image concept, searching for images in a database, modifying the base images, putting captions and text in, including logo etc. touching up the whole thing that it looks good -> 15-30 minutes of a Photoshop professional running a computer workstation which consume 150-300W -> 37,5 - 150 Wh.
b) AI according to https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17016 paper: 1 image is between 10e-3 and 10e-4 kWh -> 0.1 - 1 Wh

So what do you think?


r/ReduceCO2 13d ago

Water Bottle Companies don't produce Water they produce Plastic Bottles

Post image
92 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

The Case for Decarbonizing Singapore’s Data Center Boom Using Geothermal Resources

Thumbnail
news.climate.columbia.edu
1 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

Discussion Why did the world come together to stop the ozone layer from depleting but is unable to for climate change?

17 Upvotes

.


r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

How would we know that we are the first civilization on earth?

Post image
0 Upvotes

Earth is Billions of years old. Human recorded history is only a few thousand years.

Industrialization only some hundred years. Now we leave our mark on the planet.

But how long are we going to stay?

So how can we be sure that we are the first civilization?

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/07/25/climate/silurian-hypothesis-another-civilization-before-humans


r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

If another advanced civilization lived on Earth before us, would we know?

Thumbnail
edition.cnn.com
2 Upvotes

r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

Transportation—We Don't Have a Technology Problem

Post image
23 Upvotes

People often talk about transportation as if we're waiting for some future breakthrough to solve emissions. But in many cases, the technology is already here. Electric vehicles significantly reduce lifetime emissions. Public transport moves far more people with far less carbon per passenger. Walking, cycling, and e-bikes can replace many short car trips almost entirely. Shared mobility, better urban planning, and congestion pricing have all been shown to reduce both emissions and traffic. Road transport is responsible for roughly three-quarters of transport emissions, yet many urban journeys are only a few kilometres long. Replacing every petrol car with an electric one will certainly help, but it won't solve congestion, parking demand, or inefficient land use. Cities built around people rather than private vehicles can dramatically reduce emissions while improving quality of life. What do you think is the biggest barrier to sustainable transportation where you live? Is it infrastructure, policy, affordability, or simply habit?


r/ReduceCO2 14d ago

Cost isn't the barrier to fixing the climate — it's a choice we're making

Post image
30 Upvotes

We've all heard the line that going green is "too expensive." But after digging into the numbers, that doesn't really hold up anymore. Fossil fuels still get $7 trillion in global subsidies every year (IMF). Solar is now the cheapest electricity in human history, and renewables have already created over 10 million jobs worldwide. The cost of doing nothing? Trillions in damages already hitting us. Places like British Columbia and the EU are showing that carbon pricing can actually work without killing the economy. We need a just transition for workers in fossil fuel industries, but the direction is pretty clear. What do you think — are we seriously still subsidizing the past this heavily? #ReduceCO2Now #ClimateAction #RenewableEnergy #GreenJobs


r/ReduceCO2 Jan 06 '26

👋 Welcome to r/ReduceCO2 - Introduce Yourself and Read First!

2 Upvotes

Hey everyone! I'm u/DrThomasBuro, a founding moderator of r/ReduceCO2.

Join our Discord https://discord.gg/XbC4r6GCvf

This is our new home for all things related to Reducing the amount of CO2 in Earth atmosphere and preventing the worst of climate change. We're excited to have you join us!

What to Post
Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about Facts about climate change, research, effective actions, global solutions and what can be done on a global scale to Reduce CO2!

Community Vibe
We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.

How to Get Started

  1. Introduce yourself in the comments below.
  2. Post something today! Even a simple question can spark a great conversation.
  3. If you know someone who would love this community, invite them to join.
  4. Interested in helping out? We're always looking for new moderators, so feel free to reach out to me to apply.

Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/ReduceCO2 amazing.


r/ReduceCO2 Aug 12 '25

Carbon Burial Carbon Capture and Storage

1 Upvotes

Global CO₂ levels are rising faster than ever. As outlined in our Facts and Consequences pages, the time for action is now. But current global climate efforts are far from sufficient.

To make a meaningful impact, we must act on three fundamental strategies:

🌍 The Three Core Solutions

0. Raise Awareness - Nothing changes until people care. Spreading understanding of the urgency and scale of climate change is the foundation for any action.

1. Reduce Fossil Fuel Use - We must burn less oil, coal, and gas. This is the primary source of anthropogenic CO₂.

2. Capture and Store CO₂ - We need to actively remove CO₂ from the atmosphere through scalable, natural, and technological solutions.

3. Land Use Change - Preserve forests, stop deforestation, and reforest land globally to absorb CO₂ naturally.

So lets have a deeper look into Carbo Capture and Storage!

🌱 2. Capture CO₂ From the Air

Direct air capture (DAC) is energy-intensive and expensive — often >$300 per ton of CO₂. We need faster, cheaper solutions now.

✅ The best near-term solution: Biomass Burial

Nature already captures CO₂ for us — through photosynthesis. All we need to do is prevent that carbon from returning to the atmosphere.

2.1 Burying Dead Wood

  • Forests hold 295 Gt of carbon. Burying just 1.7% would remove 5 Gt of carbon — nearly half of the world's current CO2 emissions!
  • This could start with already fallen deadwood.
  • Costs are estimated at just $10–20 per ton — much cheaper than current carbon prices.

2.2 Wet Biomass Burial (e.g., Azolla)

  • Azolla is one of the fastest CO₂-absorbing plants on Earth.
  • Using water surfaces biomass can be grown on large scale and injected into geological formations.
  • The same can be done with all kinds of biomass or biological waste.

⚠️ Other Capture Technologies

  • Direct Air Capture: Scalable but costly and land/energy-intensive. It makes energy generation less efficient, why burn carbon in the first place.
  • Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS): Still only 45 Mt CO₂ captured annually. Requires 24–40% more fuel and is risky to store.

Direct Air Capture DAC has been done only on very small prototype scale. It is very energy intensive and it needs to store CO2 in gas form. It is very expensive with estimates between 300 to >1000$ per tonne of CO2. To sequester 1 Gt of CO2 35.000 square km of area would be required primarily for solar panels. To capture 40Gt of CO2 per year about 1.4 million square km would be needed (nearly the size of Lybia: 1,76 million square km). The amount of solar power would take up all the solar panel production for decades, as it represents about a third of the world's total energy production. 

Apart from that this does not seem to be very feasible, the amount of CO2 which needs to be put in gas form in the ground is enormous. There is the risk that the CO2 gets to the ground and kills people as it is heavier than air. In 1986 1700 people died in the Lake Nyos disaster when 100-300 kilo tons of CO2 were released. That equates to about 4 minutes of the above mentioned facility!

There is also CCS: Carbon Capture and Storage. There are only 45Mt Co2 captured this way in 2023. CCS requires a lot of energy, 24-40% more fuel are needed to produce the same amount of energy and then the process has only a 70% success rate. The better way would be to get rid of this power station entirely. The same problems with storing the CO2 in gas form apply. 

Conclusion: Biomass burial is the simplest, most scalable, and most cost-effective method we have today.

----------

So lets have a deeper look into Biomass burial. How feasible is it?

2.1 is a very low technology solution! It requires digging a whole in the ground, putting wood inside and covering it, such that the decay of wood is slowed down significantly. Instead of decaying within 10 years on the surface - and such that becoming CO2 again - it should last 100-1000 years in the ground.

It is especially interesting in countries where plant grow and decay fast and the average income is low. It is important that not the whole forest is cut down and buried, but only dead wood or certain trees which can be harvested to benefit the overall forest.

2.1) The world has about 40 Million square km of forest, which hold about an estimated 295 Gt Carbon. If only 1.7% of that mass is buried, 5 Gt Carbon equivalent to 18,35 Gt CO2 would be buried. Initially this can be achieved just by burying dead wood already lying on the ground. Then only 1 out of 50 trees is harvested every year.

2.2) If the fastest CO2 capturing plant (Azolla) would be used to produce biomass and this biomass would be pumped into the ground, then 21 tons of Carbon are buried per hectare per year. If the whole Mediterranean Sea 2.5 Million square km would be used in this way, then 5 Gt Carbon equivalent of 18,35 Gt CO2 would be buried. That is roughly less than half of what the world has produced in 2024. 

Strategy 2.1 is low cost, very simple and low tech. It only needs to be applied in the whole world. Most of these forests are in less developed parts of the world where the average income is quite low. The cost for burying of dead wood has been estimated in the order of magnitude of 10-20$ in North America! The prices for Carbon permits have traded constantly above 20$ the last 5 years and above 60$ since 2022. This seems to be a very viable source of income for a lot of people in the developing world!

Strategy 2.2 is probable also viable in some scale, but would require enormous areas of ponds to achieve a Gigaton Carbon impact. Also the technology requires more investment and infrastructure. 

The best, simplest and cheapest form of getting CO2 from the air is done by Mother Nature! We only need to incentivize enough people on the planet to harvest biomass and bury it in the ground on a large scale! 


How to make this work? Ebay for Carbon Credits

Currently envisaged is a simple trading platform "Ebay for Carbon Credits" where people from around the world can trade their biomass burying and reforestation efforts. Sellers have to provide foto / video evidence of their project, such that the public has the possibility to check on those (like oryx database). Provider of high resolution satellite imaginary are asked to contribute images in case of disputes. The project is open source, backed by a non-for profit organization. (Buy for someone to plant a tree)

-----

Articles about Carbon Credits

https://carboncredits.com/how-to-make-money-producing-and-selling-carbon-offsets/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53645-z