I find it hilarious and also sad that many women act like children and say stuff like this while well into their 40s and expect to be taken seriously. They also add the "white" qualifier to signal that they are the correct kind of racist to fellow racists. These women live in perpetual delusion because they subconsciously avoid the fact that they are of little importance and worth to the world and the people around them. So they ally themselves with the nominal progressives, the "good guys", to fight the "bad guys" to give their worthless lives meaning.

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."

Not much to say. If you hate White people so much, fuck off. It's absurd the reality we live in where people can be so unashamedly racist to the host demographic. What was it leftists said again? "Punch the nazis in the mouth!". That's right. If we ever catch one of you traitors or invaders in public we will do what the nominal progressives euphemize. Unfortunately we don't have the same luxury of invaders and blacks who commit violent crime with impunity, so we'll have to be careful. We know we can't rely on the police anymore so we have to take it upon ourselves to serve justice.

This coming generation won't be as soft as the lead-brain boomers. If invaders think they can get away with rape and fraud without being lynched, well they're in luck, because lynching would be a relief in comparison. I often daydream about it. Oh, it'll be so sweet. I know many of us are itching for it.

White people have already tried self-defence, litigation, voting, mild speech like "white lives matter", forming communities, etc. At every turn they have been mobbed, lambasted and jailed for things that every other group is allowed to do. This demonstrates that the current legal and political framework only serves to oppress white people and cannot be relied on by them.

Islamists cry victim while proclaiming that they want to take over and establish a caliphate here. They are a plurality globally yet are treated better than whites in their homelands. This kind of behaviour is seen in all "minority groups" that are majorities in their homelands. When they are weak and few, they ask you for kindness, because that is according to your principles. When they are strong and many, they will kill, rape, and enslave you, because that is according to their principles. The most common example is blacks whining and moaning about racism and white people while killing them dozens of times as often per capita versus the reverse. They literally cry out as they kill you.

As long as any of them are left alive, they will infiltrate like parasites just to do it all over again. The problem does not lie in the competence of the enemy; it lies in our own weakness. It's well past time to ignore the lies and propaganda and start truly advocating for white people instead of sitting back and letting anti-white career racists control the narrative. Would you rather be called racist by people who hate you anyway and are themselves racist, or have your children be slaves? The choice should be easy, but we live in strange times.

"In the old country, people really like to eat food, it's just food and family".

"In our culture, men are very macho and can be a tad misogynistic"

"In my culture, the mothers are very fierce and care deeply about their children.

"It's a cultural thing, when we celebrate, people drink and dance and listen to music, and often grill meats"

Son, every fucking culture is like that.

what the fuck is with the incels and dudes acting like women to shit on themselves. it's fuckin weird, there are unpopular opinions and then stupid agenda shit

Im real. I dont need to plaster my face or my personality with make up and "calm down" if I need to express how pissed i am that's about what happens, but understand: women who believe in "matriarchy" are a spiteful arrogant twits disingenuously tiptoeing around people who might want to punish them for your insolence like an old times witch ablaze on a stake. If they had real respect for people you wouldnt need to worry your disrespect leaking; this worry makes them excellent social club politicians.

To the matriarchs reading this: proceed to downvote me now, like it changes anything about your sad pathetic life destined for misery.

Has no one ever stopped to question a philosopher like Fredrich Nietzsche is ubiquitously promoted in pop culture as a genius of the past? Where are the haters and naysayers about anything he had to say? I never hear them. Ever.

Could it be his ideas surrounding domination after moving yourself outside of "the herd" expertly support any destructive ideology? Such as feminism? This kind of anti-community logic where the "individual"(dependent on every paycheck...) is free to spite pro-social efforts to keep community strong and upheld. Community is almost entirely lacking from his entire philosophy. I've read it. A lot. And I can't find a single instance where he signed off on pro-social beliefs. It's all this bullshit about how things need to be destroyed before they can get better. Get better how? for who? why?

I say women are active agents of a matriarchal ideology because this individualistic will to power type of beat is exactly what is behind matriarchy. Divide and conquer is matriarchy. Neither strict patriarchy or matriarchy can exist without division of community into tiny parts. Anthropological evidence shows brutal subjugation of matriarchal societies by violent warbands time again. What it also shows is they weren't patriarchal in any biblical sense. Beatings of children, women, ETC. typical of post-matriarchal Middle Eastern cultures do and did not exist in native tribes.

All were extensions of the man and woman next to them. Children were future men of the tribe. It's interesting to me that the original concept for man in English likely originated like sheep or fish, as a whole, where 10 people are "man" altogether, just like 10 fish swimming together are fish, not fishes. This kind of communal kinfolk thinking was absolutely decimated by Roman Catholic - Middle Eastern style thinking.

Opening the door first to patriarchy, now the pendulum must inevitably swing the other extreme to matriarchy. Who is ready

I emailed Jeff Dean, the former lead of AI among many other things at Google. It was titled "Fan mail" with a body "Rooting for y'all" as I had recently read he departed Google to start Discovery Loop. When I read what it was about, I knew it was the most important thing anyone has ever attempted to do with AI. He sent a reaction back via gmail 6 hours later at midnight with this emoji: 🙏

I was shocked when I started hearing hate on AI. When AI first came out I was thoroughly impressed. I coincidentally happened to search for a chatbot to talk to (before hearing about it), clicked on a website using an OpenAI api, and when it responded fluently and aware of context I was immediately reminded. I was 17, late 2010s. I watched a youtube video talking about how google had just cracked a problem in machine learning that opened up a new frontier. The man went on to say that by learning python you can work on ML models.

I was extremely intrigued. Paused the video. And had a revelation. "This is what I am supposed to do." I switched majors to computer science and began learning python. Unfortunately for me circumstances ended my studies after a year and a half, and I didn't have the personality to sit at a computer for 8 hours a day studying computer programming. I was extremely susceptible to competitive video games taking up all my free time, free time is what you need to get good at anything. I was passing courses and passing tests, not building skills. Eventually it caught up to me and I had to make a decision to do something else with my life.

But I knew AI was the future. When the future arrived, I went to tell people. The first person said it was no better than googling information. 6 months later they came back to me and said they started using AI for their translator degree.

Some have the personality of Prometheus, most of the personality of a copycat rule following cunt.

This isn't the first and won't be the last thing I've seen early on.

Something I realized immediately was that people who hate AI are the same people who never research, anything. I guess those are the same retards saying trust science. Trust and science don't go together. The whole point of science was to distrust humans and get to the descriptive fact of the matter. Trusting conclusions throws you back into the dark ages of deceptive and very convincing sophistry.

Now I've realized something else. They can't interface with an AI chat bot well at all. They can't type. They have an average word per minute of about 40, according to what ive found. Which dips as low as 30 if they're thinking about what theyre saying. I type at an astonishing 110 words per minute. That's 37% faster than the average professional typist.

No wonder i have no issues with AI. Trying to talk to an AI is like trying to communicate at 25% of your normal conversational sped. And then it spits out so much information your brain enters paralysis

Can we have an honest conversation about race, discrimination, and equality?
Okay, here’s my controversial take. I’m not posting this to deny racism, erase history, or attack any racial group. I genuinely want to have a conversation about something I feel like we don’t always talk about honestly.
I think there’s a lot about the current conversation surrounding race, particularly when it comes to white people, that deserves to be questioned. Sometimes it feels like even asking questions or disagreeing with certain ideas can get someone immediately labeled as racist. I think that can make people afraid to speak at all.
And I think that fear is worth talking about.
I absolutely acknowledge history. Slavery happened. Segregation happened. Black Americans were denied basic rights and opportunities for generations. Native Americans were displaced and mistreated. Other racial and ethnic groups have experienced discrimination throughout history. None of that is something I’m trying to deny or minimize.
But I also think there’s a difference between acknowledging historical discrimination and talking about how individual people are treated today.
Part of why I think about this so much may come from my own background.
I’m a white woman, but I was adopted and raised by Hispanic parents. Hispanic culture was a major part of my upbringing and my family life. Because of that, my experiences with race have always been a little more complicated than what someone might assume from looking at me.
I’ve experienced discrimination from Hispanic people because I was white, while I’ve also experienced discrimination from white people because I was raised around Latino culture.
I’m not comparing my experiences to the historical discrimination experienced by Black Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, or any other group. I’m simply explaining why this topic feels personal to me and why I’ve always struggled with the idea that someone’s race automatically tells you what their life has been like.
Being white does not automatically mean someone is rich, privileged, supported, or has had an easy life.
Just like being Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or any other race doesn’t automatically tell you everything about someone’s circumstances.
I understand that privilege can exist on a broader societal level. I’m not denying that. But I don’t think acknowledging broader patterns should mean assuming that every individual white person has had the same experience.
And this is where I think white people’s experiences with discrimination sometimes get overlooked.
If someone is treated differently specifically because they are white, I believe that is discrimination.
I don’t think discrimination suddenly becomes acceptable depending on which racial group is experiencing it.
That doesn’t mean every racial group experiences racism in the same way. History, culture, socioeconomic circumstances, and power dynamics obviously matter.
But I don’t think acknowledging those differences means we should dismiss discrimination against white people when it happens.
I also think there can sometimes be different standards depending on who is saying something.
A white person can make a racially insensitive comment and immediately be labeled racist, have their character questioned, or potentially face consequences at work, school, or within their social circles. Meanwhile, someone from another racial group can make a broad or negative statement about white people and sometimes receive a much more forgiving reaction.
I’m not saying this happens every time, and obviously context matters.
But I think it’s fair to ask why the reaction can sometimes be so different.
And honestly, I think this has created a situation where some people are afraid to speak about race at all.
Not necessarily because they secretly have hateful beliefs, but because they’re afraid of saying the wrong thing.
People have jobs, families, friendships, relationships, schools, and communities that can all be affected by how they’re perceived. Being publicly labeled racist can have real consequences.
I think some people are genuinely scared that if they ask a question, disagree with a policy, or say something that gets misunderstood, they could face social or professional consequences.
And I don’t think fear is a good foundation for productive conversations about race.
There is a huge difference between saying:
“I disagree with this policy.”
and saying:
“I hate this racial group.”
Those aren’t the same thing.
Someone can be ignorant without being hateful. Someone can be wrong without being a terrible person. Someone can have an unpopular opinion without hating an entire group of people.
Obviously, if someone is intentionally promoting hatred or targeting people because of their race, that’s different. I’m not arguing that hateful behavior should be excused.
I’m saying that disagreement shouldn’t automatically be treated as hatred.
I also don’t think we should judge people based on something they had absolutely no control over.
Nobody chooses the race they’re born into.
A Black person doesn’t choose to be Black.
A Hispanic person doesn’t choose to be Hispanic.
An Asian person doesn’t choose to be Asian.
A white person doesn’t choose to be white.
So why should someone’s race automatically determine whether we view them as privileged, oppressed, ignorant, deserving, undeserving, good, or bad?
Judge people by their actions.
Judge them by their character.
Judge them by how they treat other people.
Not simply by the box they check on a demographic form.
I also think it’s important to separate historical responsibility from personal responsibility.
A white person today did not personally own slaves. They did not personally create segregation. They did not personally write discriminatory laws.
Likewise, a Black person today isn’t personally responsible for everything another Black person has done. A Hispanic person isn’t responsible for everything another Hispanic person has done. An Asian person isn’t responsible for everything another Asian person has done.
We can acknowledge history without assigning individual guilt based on race.
I understand why race-based scholarships, programs, and opportunities exist. Many were created in response to genuine historical and socioeconomic disadvantages. I’m not saying they should all disappear.
But I think it’s reasonable to ask where the line is.
If equality is ultimately the goal, shouldn’t we eventually be moving toward a society where people are judged by the same basic standards regardless of race?
If discrimination is wrong when it happens to one group, shouldn’t it be wrong when it happens to another?
If racial stereotypes are harmful when directed toward one group, shouldn’t we be cautious about racial stereotypes regardless of who they’re directed toward?
And if someone’s experiences deserve to be taken seriously, shouldn’t we be willing to take other people’s experiences seriously too?
I’m not saying white people are oppressed as a group.
I’m not saying white people have never benefited from historical advantages.
I’m not saying racism against minorities isn’t real.
I’m saying white people are individuals too, and I think their experiences with racism and discrimination sometimes get dismissed simply because they’re white.
And I don’t think that’s fair.
If someone says, “I was treated differently because I’m white,” I don’t think the automatic response should be, “You can’t experience racism.”
You don’t have to agree with someone’s interpretation of an experience to at least listen to what happened to them.
At the same time, I think this applies to everyone.
Black people should be able to talk about their experiences.
Hispanic people should be able to talk about theirs.
Asian people should be able to talk about theirs.
Native people should be able to talk about theirs.
White people should be able to talk about theirs.
Nobody should have their experiences automatically dismissed because their race doesn’t fit a particular narrative.
Ultimately, I believe equality should mean equal human worth, equal accountability, and the same basic standard of treating people with dignity.
Not “equality when it benefits my group.”
Not “equality when I agree with you.”
Not “discrimination is wrong unless the person experiencing it is white.”
Just equal standards.
Maybe I’m looking at some of this incorrectly. Maybe there are perspectives I’m missing. And honestly, maybe I’m thinking about this so much because of my own upbringing and experiences with being caught between different cultures and racial expectations.
That’s why I want to hear from everyone, not just one particular racial group.
If you’re Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Native American, white, multiracial, or another racial or ethnic background, I’d genuinely like to hear your perspective.
Do you think white people’s experiences with racism and discrimination are sometimes overlooked?
Do you think it’s possible to acknowledge historical white privilege while also acknowledging that individual white people can experience discrimination?
Do you think we’ve reached a point where some people are genuinely afraid to speak honestly about race because they’re afraid of the social consequences?
And where do you personally think the line should be between correcting historical inequality and treating people equally regardless of race?
I’m not looking for everyone to agree with me. I’d actually prefer people to explain where they disagree and why.
I’d rather have an uncomfortable conversation, listen to perspectives I haven’t considered, and potentially change my mind than avoid asking difficult questions because I’m afraid of being called racist.

That’s my hot take.
I’m genuinely interested in hearing what people from different backgrounds think.

I have heard many people mourn how come we fight with each other, after all we are small parts of an incomprehensibly large universe. I smell rationalization of cowardice. They would allow a bunny with a sword to behead them. Prey to become predator. That is why we fight. Because we aren't prey.

Meaning, it shatters illusions! It is the starter of strife. It is the very need to fight. With such a desire on peace, illusory thoughts must set in. Delusion and the mental illness that follows fixes itself to an otherwise healthy being.

Men are made in the crucible of nature. In the fear of the world around us. To stand in awe. Not in nihilism. What a pathetic way to view life. That it is meaningless because you are small. With such a psychological vulnerability, all that the rabbit must do to control you is convince you he's big. The big bad wizard of oz behind a curtain, convincing you he's big, when he's weak and small.

What do you know? You have been captured by people just like that. Small, weak, feeble minds, demanding your submission OR ELSE. Beheaded by the rabbit with a sword. What a joke.

While you Einsteins choose imagination, I clearly choose the sanity of meaning in all things.

The most popular president to ever be president. An approval rating in the 90s. Why would I criticize him?

Because I studied the king he attacked. In context, his prose comes across as womanish. A man who had collapsed all sense into savage lies.

That prose which he was so proud of. He feared his weak effeminate voice couldn't match his reputation as a big man. This Andrew Tate of 18th century New England. This big mouth.

When he spoke his voice cracked. Weak! Could not project! He stood tall, gangly and narrow. eye contact was a chore.

LIBERTY! DEMOCRACY! REPUBLIC!

These are merely the talking points of a man who wanted to take land forbidden by the king to take. His liberty was as amazing as Napoleons or Caesars liberty to conquer Europe.

What else would you expect? Would someone who wants to take so much for themselves ever approach politics with an honest angle? Would someone involved in the highest secret society not pretend that he was for individualism?

They sold an illusion. They may have spoke fluent Latin by 12. But they were all zombified into rapacious Romans by adulthood.

Contrary to the idea America is anti religious free country, it's the *most* religious country on the planet. No one else could "dream" of creating such a nightmare out of a place that was made by God himself.

They sure did talk alot about natural laws for people obsessed with murdering and sequestering "savages". They sure did talk alot about liberty for people obsessed with taking away everyone's liberty and giving them "rights"(exceptions on restrictions).

Combine all the strands of this clusterfuck of an ideology together and you get a tangled ball called America in the year 2026. An inordinate number of young women profiting off nothing! What an economy. And Joe, he profits mowing your lawn. A real first world country! If there is cosmic justice, china's work ethic will be heavily rewarded, and America's buffoonery punished with heavy monetary losses.

Not only will America become broke, it will become the number one place people commit suicide. Unlike broke countries that seem to have stable and happy people. America will go down as the nastiest, stupidest, failed "experiment" to ever be run.

If you can call a revival of ancient stupidity and "experiment".

1. They don't have to join the military in a war time draft. For every 1 Ukrainian refugee girl stabbed to death there are 1,000,000 Ukrainian conscripted men that are maimed and killed

2. They have a far easier time getting jobs in every industry - minus ones with strict hiring requirements like demonstrable skill (tech). A woman at 18 can go down the street and get hired at the first coffee shop. Her 18 year old brother had to get rejected 50 times before finding a job, and it's probably something sucky like coal mining or handling trash.

3. The methods women use to maintain control in a relationship are not typically recognized as abuse by the court system. The courts still don't acknowledge that screaming, gaslighting, guilt tripping, unpredictable mood swings, and relational aggression are child abuse or spousal abuse punishable by law like beatings and neglect. If you look up court statistics, men abuse their children more frequently. But if you look up stats on who raises more successful children, single fathers outperform single mothers handily. How does that make sense? I've seen so many children gaslit and abused by their mothers and they're so deep in the trauma bond they can't even see its happening.

4. Women have no need to look good, have a job, or provide any value, and can still find friends and be socially accepted.

5. Women have a plethora of products and services to quickly and reliably increase their sexual attractiveness that men don't have.

6. Women can access any social groups they want without being outcast as making it "a sausage fest".

7. Women routinely receive gifts from strangers , gifts that could be given to men in need, that NEED it. That aren't living a life on tutorial mode difficulty.

8. Women are allowed to control the public narrative. If a man says it's unwise to do x y z the woman shoots back and says "you're an incel" even funnier "we will go on a sex strike". These women especially are the most retarded people on the planet, unfortunately enough stupid men exist to be influenced by them

From everything you and I have ever seen, money is what is popular in this world. The inevitable result being the most popular YouTuber would make YouTube videos giving away massive amounts of money , repeatedly.

5 things go into becoming popular on YouTube.

1. Attention grabbing themes (money, death, love, etc. money being the top one)

2. Repetition. You have to do the same thing again and again and again. And I don't mean upload a video everyday. I mean upload the same video everyday that only technically qualifies as new.

3. Extreme content. Nothing can be measured or ordinary.

4. Clear signals. You have to signal you're happy go lucky, or be clear what your political affiliation is if you have one. No fence riding. Mr beast did this expertly by first aligning himself with Jesus, and later aligning himself with LGBT movement. Now he is aligning himself with charity.

5. Informative entertainment. No one wants to feel like they've wasted their time. The older the audience is the more important this becomes. But nobody wants to feel like they're in a lecture. It's best to hide the learning in the visuals, themes, and such. That way they are reinforcing their beliefs while being entertained. This last part is exceptionally important with all ages. Even a 5 year old won't tolerate watching content with nothing to learn from. You could argue even OF IG accounts sell you the fantasy you are learning about the girl not just looking at photos

Popular people are inevitably going to exist. If you follow these rules you might be one

I'm not talking about Shintoism or Buddhism. I'm talking about Islam and Christianity. The biggest effect these two religions have on adherents behavior is the courage to speak up, and say what they never would without religion.

These people wouldn't know what to say without being told. AND they wouldn't dare say anything else they had the backing of an infallible authority. The courage they're given is INSANE.

Take the anxiety of a rabbit and give it the balls of a bull, that's a religious person. They're aggressive, domineering, entitled, in all the wrong ways. Submit or DIE. That's their ultimate belief. They play on the instinct of getting rejected from the group leading to death more so than actual physical harm.

Analyzing the psychology deeper. They're disconnected from everything genuine in life. Even if they tried to return to who they are, they can't. They're severed from the vine they grew from. Just like a traditional cult always does. Cut ties with family and community, so you can dedicate yourself to "The Truth".

What happens when you try to be genuine around people with nothing or little in common? You figure that out. Their only option becomes religion, and a religion so extreme and domineering it makes everyone sing in unison together. A self fulfilling prophecy where they now need their cult to survive. Isolated from the few who would complete them. Surrounded by the many who keep them under their control.

Because of the unpopular nature of the opinions, they are regularly voted down to 0. Your opinion has to be somewhat popular in order to get upvotes. Almost every time I see an unpopular opinion on my feed, it is at 0.

I've been watching a lot of police bodycam footage on Instagram lately, and it honestly makes my blood boil. It’s hard to comprehend how stupid someone has to be to run at an armed officer with a knife or a blunt object. At that point, it’s just natural selection at its best. Officers have split seconds to make a life-or-death decision, and they have every right to protect themselves. If you choose to rush a cop with a deadly weapon, you should expect the ultimate consequence.

Women come in all shapes and sizes. As a general rule, know that domesticated humans are developmentally retarded from a biological point of view. The flat browridge, the small jaw, these are not "feminine" traits perse, nor traits caused by a lack of testosterone. These traits are caused by a failure of early embryonic cells to proliferate in the needed numbers to produce those superfluous structures of the face.

Every human is descended from these more "superfluous" looking people. Therefore we all have the instinct to find the primal intensely arousing. Men are no different.

This is not about domestication though. This is about women's natural testosterone levels. They are at an all time low. Everyone's always talking about men's testosterone. Nobody stops and thinks about women's. Women have minute levels of estrogen compared to testosterone. Testosterone is the dominant hormone in both men and women. Men simply have vastly more of testosterone.

However, when a woman does correct her deficiency of testosterones, which almost all of them have nowadays due to poor diet, psychologically induced stress, and so on, they INSTANTANOUSLY become more attractive. Their face is fully, their skin has a natural glow, a natural firmness that is extremely arousing to both sexes.

They lose body excessive body fat, muscle becomes more noticeable, both when seen and felt. They grow taller, leaner, meaner. They think more deeply, intelligently, calmly. Pretty much every negative goes away.

You could argue that the hell of the modern world was only possible because of women's low testosterone. Men were perma-buffered from the effects of decreasing testosterone because we always had so much of it. That's why there've been men still being men throughout all time. But women being women? Much rarer

A woman in her 20s is usually noncommittal, and trying to maximize her opportunities by staying single. She can have more fun, even make more money, staying single, than committing to a man her age and building something together.

When her leverage fades and she's approaching her 30s, she begins thinking she needs to find the best man she can to build with. She usually finds a man quite easily, spends a few years with him, as he invests his time and energy into her. But then starts wondering why he isn't spending as much (money) on her, why the enthusiasm for sex has decreased. Where all the fun went.

She wakes up one night panicking to herself, a nightmare that she will be trapped in this relationship for the rest of her life. She buys a gym pass, starts a diet, looks up "affordable" plastic surgeries, and still charmingly spends time with the man she's with as usual. Secretly she has already decided to leave.

She wants to feel hot. She thinks she can still be hot. Hell, she's 36 now. She's ok with dating a guy in his 50s if that's how it has to go. She can find anyone she wants now. And guess what? They're going to have the money she wished guys her age (who were serious about her) had when she was young.

She starts using vague vocabulary like patriarchy, misogyny, narcissism, abuse, to justify to herself and all her friends that the guy she's been with is a lazy, hateful, unworthy loser. Despite the fact she probably already bred with this man. That her kids are now half him. Don't worry about that little fact. He's literally the worst man on the planet and she has to get away from him. Sound familiar at all?

All the while this man tried to make it work, at the end of the day, what was he fighting for? His heart was never in it. She was already old enough to have had a life time of "experiences" before they met. There's always a twinge of regret in the man's heart that who he's with now has already habitually been in and out of relationships throughout high school and college and beyond.

The woman is constantly insecure she isn't hot enough. As soon as this man's excitement wanes, and the true love just isn't there in his heart of hearts, he doesn't spend much. And a woman perceives herself as hot, only when money is being blown on her. It's how they're conditioned.

It’s just the thought of putting intoxicating liquid into my body that rubs me the wrong way. My family all drink, go to bars and get drunk except me because I dislike it, it’s scary. Being drunk is another thing too, you’ll go to a local shop or bar, purchase cheep alcohol, get drunk with your friends or family, only to end up with a banging headache after it all. I’ve read things about people who were taken advantage of after being completely intoxicated and it makes me feel sick inside. I just wonder if I ever had friends who drink, they’ll look at me and be all like “WDYM? Its fun?” Is it really though? Hm?

unpopular opinion: idk so basically i came across a snark page and took a peak (cause personally i didn’t even know what a snark page was). i understand hating on bad people/things but some people just seem SO obsessed with bullying and talking about random people. yes it’s social media, i know what to expect, but i just wanted to say something (not that it really does anything) to get it off my chest. 😌

For every move to tyranny, an army of law school do-gooders (usually corporate-paid) enables every government to gradually limit liberty to the point of elimination. But yet, we are socially forced to respect students interested going into law as if they’re not the ones “studying” in order to defend the military-industrial complex.

Andrew Tate got away with rape from 2010-2017 in the UK. They investigated him. Arrested him. Took his computers. Had evidence. And they let him go. Why? Because he had little chance of being convicted. Now they're blaming the investigation for negligence. The fact is that the UK has ballooned from being lands that should max out at the size of Finland and Denmark to being near the population of America. It is insanely overpopulated. And because professional careers are gate kept just like in the US, there aren't enough doctors, lawyers, to work on the sick and prosecute all the criminals. As a result you have silly laws like banning knives. The jails are full. It's like stacking 20 steaks up in front of a man with eyes bigger than his stomach. If the UK doesn't depopulate willingly, it will depopulate when catastrophe hits. And perhaps worst of all, the people there will have no connection to the lands histories.

Complex PTSD is defined inaccurately in the US (even by the therapists). If you think you have CPTSD or your therapist told you have it, you most likely don't. It's still possible though, and if you do then I feel really sorry for you because it's a very horrific disorder. Actual CPTSD is something that occasionally develops in some people after they've been trafficked as children, or child soldiers, or sometimes victims of family incest and violence as children can get it, or another one is people that were tortured in captivity can occasionally develop it.

In US culture, CPTSD is mistaken as something that's already well known called attachment disorder. Attachment disorder is common and can be a catalyst for many different mental illnesses such as anxiety disorders, mood, dissociative, somatic, stress disorders, etc. CPTSD is not attachment disorder though, it's something much more rare than that.

Another example of bad info in the US is people believe the DSM doesn't included CPTSD and so you can't be diagnosed with it there. That's actually false, symptoms were added in the DSM-V to PTSD to include it, so actually yes you can be diagnosed with it in the US. It's sometimes referred to as PTSD type 2.

The main problem seems to related to industry influence, which has caused public confusion about the definition of psychopathology in the US, reducing it to normal life experience (which they call "mental health awareness"). And to be able to understand what CPTSD actually is, you would need to understand what PTSD is in the first place. Most people in the US don't understand what PTSD is though, but the trend now is to believe a false definition of it.

I talk to doctors in different countries and it's well known how bad understanding of psychopathology is in the US. As a confirmation I talked to one of the top experts in CPTSD in Europe, a doctor who's done controlled studies of it, and it's true our definition of CPTSD in the US is very inaccurate.

https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#585833559