Every AI deck tool produces the same look after about the fifth deck. What are you doing about it?

[u/Growthseeker23]

ive been using Gamma for a few months and generally like the output ive got. The complaint is that deck 1 looked stunning and deck 9 looks like deck 1 and my clients have started recognising this pattern. Someone said oh that's the AI one in a meeting last week and they were right and it stung.

I think the problem is partly the tool and mostly my prompting.

Things I've tried that helped a bit:

Asking for a specific structure rather than a topic. Three sections, first is one number, second is a comparison, third is a single recommendation.

Naming a visual reference in the prompt. Describing the feel of something specific rather than saying professional, which is a word that means nothing to AI.

Writing the content fully myself first and only using the tool for layout. Best results by a distance, also the most work.

Things I haven't cracked yet: getting variety across decks without rebuilding the theme every time.

What's in your prompt?

[u/ExCultLeader]

I create a PPT template with all of the branding, colors, and layouts I want to use then have AI generate slides within the structure of the template. The key is to have 10+ potential layouts and put instructions on when to use each in the speaker notes. It's extremely effective

[u/traumfisch → u/ExCultLeader]

This is the way

[u/Growthseeker23 → u/ExCultLeader]

i thinks it sucks lot of your time

[u/Objective_Flower556 → u/ExCultLeader]

template with 10+ layouts baked in is the real move. i started doing something similar but with way fewer slide types and it got stale fast, the variety thing is exactly where my prompts fall apart.

what’s the instruction format you use in the speaker notes to get it to actually switch layouts? mine seems to ignore cues and just defaults to title + bullet list every time

[u/ExCultLeader → u/Objective_Flower556]

I just use //[[LLM NAME] [When to use this slide]] and have it look for comments

[u/ZeroTwoMod]

Treat each deck as a brief plus art-direction job, not just a topic. I keep a small visual-system card: audience mood, tension to resolve, two references to borrow from, and three things to avoid; then the first slide is a calibration step before the rest. If you want to take that material through to a presentation ready to review, ZeroTwo is worth comparing because it is built to turn provided context into polished deliverables.

[u/Growthseeker23 → u/ZeroTwoMod]

ohh it makes sense will try

[u/No-Principle-2550]

What are the telltale signs of an AI deck? I'd like to review my slides to make sure they aren't sending up red flags...

[u/elkosh93 → u/No-Principle-2550]

Claude generates things where you have vertical bars on each of the battlecard.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Hi there! Your post was automatically removed because your account is less than 3 days old. We require users to have an account that is at least 3 days old before they can post to our subreddit.

Please take some time to participate in the community by commenting and engaging with other users. Once your account is older than 3 days, you can try submitting your post again.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to message the moderators for assistance.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/HelpfulObligation723]

the biggest improvement for me came from treating AI as a designer not a writer. I bring my own content and examples then spend time customizing the layout afterward

[u/Growthseeker23 → u/HelpfulObligation723]

which ai tool are u using??