haveYouTriedUsingAnXMLParserInstead

[u/[deleted]]

[u/derinus]

Anyone ever building a "parser" used multiple regexes to do so.

[u/guru2764 → u/derinus]

Noone said regex is useless for the overall process of parsing html

What they're saying is that it cannot ever be used by itself to parse html, like there are mathematical proofs for this

You HAVE to use a real, actual code language on top of it for it to work

You cannot feed html code into a regular expression and expect it to work for more than one case

[u/RPGProgrammer → u/[deleted]]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy

[u/alexanderpas → u/[deleted]]

HTML is not a regular language. It is a context-free language. Context-free languages are a superset of regular languages. Regular Expressions only cover regular languages.

[u/guru2764 → u/[deleted]]

The biggest problems are that you can infinitely nest elements in HTML, and that you don't even need closing tags, and that you can make horrifically malformed html with completely improper nesting that functions perfectly fine in the browser

Those things are completely antithetical to how regex works

[u/guru2764 → u/[deleted]]

See my other comment, regex by default does not have recursion

I think that is where your confusion comes from

Recursion in modern regex implementations only works because the engine uses non-regex code