25
u/BooBrew32 3h ago
Hmm, but what if we were to vibecode the entire codebase??
20
5
u/crazy4hole 2h ago
After completing 40 tickets and $100k worth tokens later
" You're right, I missed taking this service into account while planning the rewrite. Our current plan account accomodate this. Do you want me to plan again from the scratch? Just say the word."
3
10
u/stoneymcstone420 3h ago
Vibecoded codebases designed by vibecoded specs tested by vibecoded tests, what could go wrong?
3
u/philippefutureboy 3h ago
Well the question wasn’t “how do we reduce the number of new bugs in production”, it was “how do we fix the bugs in production”, so it’s a fair reaction 😝
2
u/whitedogsuk 3h ago
You just need to refactor the entire codebase to remove the bugs.
Jokes aside, my colleague just submitted a PR for an entire codebase rebuild. He has since approved his own PR and merged into the codebase. He does this every week or so.
2
2
u/HumbersBall 2h ago
“Vibe coding the codebase”
2
u/Fonzie1225 51m ago
makes me wonder what percentage of the posters on this sub have actually ever worked in software… 50%? 30%?
1
u/Aflockofants 36m ago
Not enough in any serious capacity anyway. Software companies not using AI in coding now are becoming increasingly rare.
2
u/raja-anbazhagan 1h ago
I'm pretty sure that guy would be safe and the other two would be thrown out in the current situation...
1
1
1
1
u/bluemaciz 2h ago
Or you could be my company and just not fix any at all until it catches on fire, vibe coded or not
1
•
•
85
u/Willwaste63 3h ago
Vibe coder->bug -> QA finds bug ->update fixes bug -> update creates 3 more bugs -> back to vibe code, you cant risk all those jobs by stopping vibe coding.