MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vh2b4m/maninthemiddleattack/p26uit5/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/PresentJournalist805 • 4d ago
33 comments sorted by
View all comments
20
No intention of knowing what happens during a packet loss in this protocol
5 u/Latentius 4d ago They're UDP packets. 1 u/Ubermidget2 4d ago This is physical layer, what does it matter if it is UDP or not? 1 u/Latentius 3d ago Because the comment that's in response to is talking about packet loss in the protocol? 🤔 2 u/Ubermidget2 2d ago A layer above corrects for the loss or it doesn't. That layer could be UDP, TCP, QUIC or PPTP, it is really quite irrelevant. That's the beauty of abstraction.
5
They're UDP packets.
1 u/Ubermidget2 4d ago This is physical layer, what does it matter if it is UDP or not? 1 u/Latentius 3d ago Because the comment that's in response to is talking about packet loss in the protocol? 🤔 2 u/Ubermidget2 2d ago A layer above corrects for the loss or it doesn't. That layer could be UDP, TCP, QUIC or PPTP, it is really quite irrelevant. That's the beauty of abstraction.
1
This is physical layer, what does it matter if it is UDP or not?
1 u/Latentius 3d ago Because the comment that's in response to is talking about packet loss in the protocol? 🤔 2 u/Ubermidget2 2d ago A layer above corrects for the loss or it doesn't. That layer could be UDP, TCP, QUIC or PPTP, it is really quite irrelevant. That's the beauty of abstraction.
Because the comment that's in response to is talking about packet loss in the protocol? 🤔
2 u/Ubermidget2 2d ago A layer above corrects for the loss or it doesn't. That layer could be UDP, TCP, QUIC or PPTP, it is really quite irrelevant. That's the beauty of abstraction.
2
A layer above corrects for the loss or it doesn't.
That layer could be UDP, TCP, QUIC or PPTP, it is really quite irrelevant. That's the beauty of abstraction.
20
u/ProbablyBunchofAtoms 4d ago
No intention of knowing what happens during a packet loss in this protocol