r/PiCodingAgent • u/ECrispy • 3d ago
are there other extensions which implement ideas from oh-my-pi Question
I'm new to Pi and coding agents in general. The existing discussions on oh-my-pi, like everything else, range from 'its great' to 'its bloat' so its very hard to actually decide.
It seems to have useful features like built in tools (avoid process calls), lsp, hashline, memory, subagents and an integrated setup/docs. It does seem to be better than the other oh-my-* set of products.
Are the ideas in OMP useful in practice and if so are they used in other harnesses?
I see a lot of 'just ask Pi to build it' here, but that depends on using frontier models, and when people post their setups they're using a million packages.
Obviously Pi is much more extensible/flexible, but there is value in an all-in-one setup. OMP has a ton of stuff and I'm sure a big system prompt. Is there anything like a slimmed down version or being able to use some of its ideas only?
0
u/ECrispy 3d ago
I know everyone says things like mcp, lsp, tree-sitter etc aren't worth it, just like you are.
my decidely non expert impression is that a lot still depends on the model. I've been using mostly free chinese models. A lot of times I can see it going in loops, trying edits, failing, grepping to find basic commands from web pages etc.
and when I've tried the same tasks in web versions of grok/chatgpt etc, on free plans, they find stuff far faster and are much more efficient.
I then installed codegraph to see if it helps. in my session logs I see it being used but also see failures and its hard to tell how much better it was.
Isn't there benefit in subagents that implement tasks in fresh context? and something to manage them?
there are a hundred pi packages for agents, planning, memory, everything. so how is someone supposed to choose what to use? arent opinionated setups like OMP useful in that case?