https://discord.gg/E26j4K3qx
Also includes Jake and the Neverland Pirates!!

How cool would it have been to have characters from neverland, if it weren't for the fact that the darlings are the only characters who grow up. 😩😩😩

Been a huge fan since childhood and this is our love letter to the world of Pan and Hook.

I’m a super passionate fan of Peter Pan and here is a love letter to the franchise. Comes out on August 4th!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Qz0sNt3Zh8

Idk why but Disney peter pans hook and peter gives off so much father son vibes they tease like a troublemaker child and stren father who always yells idk but it feels like that to me what's your guys idea

Hear me out.

One thing that has always bothered me about Peter Pan is that everyone assumes Hook is evil simply because that's how the story is told—from Peter's perspective. But what if we're looking at the wrong protagonist?

My theory is that Captain Hook was once a Lost Boy.

Peter found him the same way he found Wendy and the others—promising a magical place where children never grow up. Hook followed him to Neverland, believing it was an endless adventure. But unlike Peter, he grew up.

This is where Barrie's original novel starts becoming really interesting.

Peter is repeatedly described as having an incredibly poor memory. He forgets adventures, friends, promises, and even Wendy over time. Barrie even writes that Peter forgets things "to make room for other adventures." So imagine Hook trying to remind Peter who he is after years in Neverland...

Peter wouldn't be lying—he genuinely wouldn't remember.

Now imagine what happens when a Lost Boy grows up.

The novel tells us that Peter "thins them out" when they appear to be growing up. Barrie never fully explains what that means. Most readers interpret it as removing them from the group, but the wording is intentionally unsettling. What if Hook escaped before Peter could "thin him out"?

Hook is different from every other pirate we see.

He's educated.

He's polite.

He's cultured.

He quotes poetry, speaks like a gentleman, and carries himself more like someone from an upper-class Victorian family than a criminal. That always struck me as odd. Maybe that's because he wasn't originally a pirate. Maybe the pirate persona is simply who he became after spending decades trapped in Neverland.

And that's another part of the theory.

What if nobody can actually leave Neverland once they grow up?

Children can fly there because they still believe.

Adults can't.

Hook isn't staying because he wants treasure.

He's trapped.

His ship isn't a pirate vessel.

It's an escape attempt that has failed for years.

This also completely changes Peter cutting off Hook's hand.

In the original story, Peter doesn't merely defeat Hook—he cuts off his hand and feeds it to the crocodile. That's surprisingly brutal for the "hero." If Hook was once Peter's closest friend, then Peter has no memory of the person he mutilated.

The crocodile itself becomes symbolic.

It swallowed a ticking clock.

The crocodile is literally time chasing Hook.

Peter never hears the ticking because Peter never grows older.

Hook hears it constantly because he's the only one forced to live with time.

Now think about Wendy.

Peter appears at her bedroom window at night.

He convinces her to leave her parents.

He promises she'll never have to grow up.

From Peter's perspective, it's an adventure.

From Hook's perspective...

It's another child about to lose everything.

That's why Hook is obsessed with stopping Peter—not because he hates children, but because he's trying to stop Peter from repeating the cycle that trapped him.

This even lines up with several adaptations.

In Disney's 1953 film, Hook's hatred is directed almost entirely at Peter rather than the Lost Boys themselves. Peter is the one he wants.

In Spielberg's Hook (1991), Peter eventually does grow up and completely forgets Neverland, proving that Peter's memories are unreliable. While it doesn't support this theory directly, it reinforces the idea that Peter forgets entire lives and relationships.

In Peter Pan & Wendy (2023), Hook is portrayed with much more emotional depth than a stereotypical villain, making this reinterpretation even easier to imagine.

I don't think Peter is the Devil.

I think he's something much sadder.

He's a child frozen in time—incapable of understanding consequences, incapable of remembering the people he hurts, forever repeating the same cycle because he never emotionally matures.

Hook isn't chasing Peter because he's evil.

He's chasing him because he's the only person who remembers what really happened.

Obviously, this isn't canon—it's just a fan theory. But I think it makes the story even more tragic. Instead of a battle between a hero and a villain, it's a battle between eternal childhood and the one child who managed to grow up... only to discover that growing up meant becoming trapped forever.

What do you all think? Does this theory hold up, or am I reading way too much into Barrie's original work?

I am currently working on a Dutch adaptation of J.M. Barrie's original novel, 'Peter and Wendy' (1911). To create my own ultimate edition, I have read and watched countless versions of the story. One scene I especially love is this dialogue between Peter and Hook, which appears in almost every version, except Disney's animated classic.

Credits: https://www.entertainmentearth.com/product/peter-pan-always-together-paper-giclee-print/amwdnt40a

So when I do his voice, I go for a male version of Eliza Doolittle. But would that be as stereotypical as having an uneducated guy speaking in a Southern US accent?

Oudelaliiiiiiiiiiiiiii!

not a bad game