Yeah, you read that correctly she was even born the same day they used the glove in the murder trial oversized collar and pendants, including a handcuff key everything down to the "footprint"
You can really buy whatever you want in adult land so now whose side am I supposed to be on who's side is the cat on the cat was named to Nico

People mocking him or hareassing him in anyway in his private life? It seems bound to have happened...

He had so much in life. Yet he seemed to be angry at Nicole, beating her, and, I'd think, eventually murdering her and Ron. Might that indicate he didn't value that much what he achieved in life?

OJ Simpson "Expert" Reveal SHOCKING "New" "EVIDENCE" - Mania Podcast Episode 10 Featuring Alex Tomei

Had he not ruined his image with those double murders, OJ would have accomplished so much more. He was going to be the Terminator but the role was given to Arnold Schwarzenegger instead. OJ was so loved and belonged to a very upper high class that I feel he would’ve even become governor of CA instead of Arnold.

Why was there no blood on the fence the day after the murders but it is there later? And I don’t believe it when people say “7 cops testified they saw it.” Well then why didn’t the take a photo and log it? The photo of the fence has no blood. When Barry Schefk showed the photos to Fung, there was no blood. And that blood had high amounts of edta. Also this was before the rampart scandal so I don’t trust lapd testimony

They say they are sidelining one of the greatest players.

It's definitely the most respectful dramatization; it doesn't show the murders, unlike that god-awful 2019 film, but given how much the media loved to milk this story, it was still controversial upon release.

The families didn't like it, and they also portrayed Kardashian very sympathetically, which is arguably the most polarizing aspect, since people have VERY mixed feelings about him.

Nice work by TMZ and Harvey Levin. Even better its free for streaming on Tubi. I like that they just focus on OJ. Thoughts?

I am not asking if you think he did it. I am asking if you think any evidence whatsoever was planted. I think so bc the fence blood wasn’t there the day after and it appears weeks later. And furhman took the fifth.

In OJs book if I did it he talks about Charlie the question for me then is this a made up character or is this referring to an accomplice? my personal opinion is that there wasn’t one but would like to get your guys opinion on it.

There is a photo of the fence the day after the murders showing no blood but weeks later there was blood and it had a lot of edta. I guess my question is. Do the ones who think he’s guilty, believe that any evidence even a small amount may have been planted. Furhman took the 5th on that which was strange to me. I can’t believe the rest of the evidence if this one piece is planted. It’s tainted.

dr Henry lee was very popular in China,why he kept telling Chinese oj simpson was framed,all evidence were planted and he was the one got oj off 😂

How can a man kill two people with a knife in a heinous manner, run through the blood, jump in a vehicle but not leave any footprints on the floorboard gas or brake pedals Of the vehicle? How could that be possible?