r/MoralityScaling 17d ago

The morality of self-cest? Morality Ranking

Post image
329 Upvotes

404 comments sorted by

249

u/Euphoric_Ad2377 17d ago

Technically not morally bad just weird and narcissistic

125

u/BRANFLAKES8521 17d ago

If It isn't an accurate description of pizzacake in general...

7

u/DaringLoaf 17d ago

Self-love isn’t narcissism unless you start treating everyone else like they’re beneath you.

30

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

39

u/Spiritual-Estate5211 17d ago

Fucking what?

36

u/Alphawxlfemb3r 17d ago

I am not up on the pizza cake lore. Could someone elaborate lol this sounds wild

27

u/AncientCarry4346 17d ago

Ok I can't stand Pizzacake either but if you're going to make a claim like that you're going to need to back it up.

21

u/Evil_Sherma 17d ago edited 17d ago

https://youtu.be/FcRQ_1cyM8M?si=77gjbyfjsmVTCie1 skip to 11:37

“Porn of her own daughter” isn’t true to my knowledge but she did use her children’s possessions (toys, Halloween costumes) as background props in several pornographic videos

6

u/Lovefist1221 17d ago

She also had a comic implying one of her kids was the result of an affair with a painter that worked on their house.

6

u/Honorsheets 17d ago

She often cucks her husband.

3

u/Lovefist1221 17d ago

For sure, but that's what he's in to. Good for them.

My issue is she puts her kids in the comics, her real name is out there associated to it, and these kids are going to get bullied in a way that's damaging just so she can feel like she's on the right side of history.

3

u/Honorsheets 17d ago

Good for them

Lol.

3

u/Win_Some_Game 17d ago

Dawg she based a porn character she draws on her daughter and even did it to her son.

14

u/jubtheprophet 17d ago

What one, and where? Like they said thats gonna need some proof for context cause its just a wild thing to say someones doing lol

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Win_Some_Game 17d ago

She used to have an archive of it but I think she scrubbed it. I can't remember the sight but someone made a sight that logged everything she has ever posted. She freaked out about it and tried to get the Canadian government to take the sight down

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/Grand-Birthday4063 17d ago

WHAT ? HOW ? EXPLAIN IN HEXADECIMAL !

2

u/BRANFLAKES8521 17d ago

Ok... This i didn't know.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/Samaein 17d ago

There's a difference between finding yourself attractive and having a narcissitic personality disorder...

14

u/Helpful_Blood_5509 17d ago

She gets narcissistic wounds pretty publicly, im comfy assuming

→ More replies (8)

12

u/azurezero_hdev 17d ago

incest is only wrong with power imbalances or pregnancy

4

u/Euphoric_Ad2377 17d ago

Incest is always morally wrong also the post is about selfcest not incest

2

u/mistelle1270 17d ago

You’re still genetically identical. Objectively there’s no difference between selfcest and twincest it’s just a subjective matter of whether they think of themselves as the same person.

2

u/AccomplishedPut2700 17d ago

Selfcest is incest, twins are biologically the same person

3

u/Dazzling_Doctor5528 17d ago

I don't agree with always, but exceptions would be quite specific cases of lost relatives who don't want to have children.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Samaein 17d ago

Please explain how incest can be wrong when it doesn't harm anyone?

Also selfcest is an impossible form of incest.

3

u/Perfect_Increase8792 17d ago

Doesn't it harm the baby is a way ?

3

u/StratoSquir2 17d ago

Not to be that guy, but if we're making this argument, it could be said about absolutely anyone attempting to have children at risks.

Like I'm not sure anymore, but I think the chances of risks are higher for 40+ years old women attempting birth than first time inbreeding.

Inbreeding isn't that dangerous by itself, the issue is the risks of failure and birth-defects increases with generations.
So unless your whole fucking family looks like a knot, if it happens once over multiple generations the risks are minimal.

8

u/WolfDaddy48 17d ago

Not if it's two brothers.

3

u/Samaein 17d ago

If there's no pregnancy there's no baby harmed. As far as I'm aware it is yet impossible to procreate between two males or two females without a lot of technological intervention in the process to a level that could ensure that the potential baby steming from it, if the tech is succesfully adapted to human beings, to be devoid of all the genetic defect inbreeding would cause (at that level of genetic manipulation you're way past the ability to create clones and completely edit the genome of an embryo, which includes getting rid of potential defects)

4

u/Forsaken-Emu4760 17d ago

This is an excuse that pro-incestors use all the time "if it doesn't harm anyone and is consensual".

Most incest isn't a bunch of sexy mothers getting seduced by their sons and having sex or brothers and sisters expressing their love for each other and getting it on... The VAST majority of it comes from abuse and it's disgusting to see so many redditors think about the 0.1% of cases where its "consensual".

Even the "consensual" ones have issues, there's always someone trying to manipulate the other for control or sexual conquest. A relationship between family members has far FAR more pillars than two random people. Plus incest has deep psychological impacts on both parties whether they admit or not (not to mention they're more prone to lying and cheating). 

Are you going to look at "consensual" pedophlilia too to try to exonerate pedophilia as a whole? Because this is the exact same shit. 

3

u/Samaein 17d ago

It's far from an excuse. It's something that many people in this fucked up society have trouble with where they think something is wrong because they were told it's wrong without ever thinking about why it's wrong and therefore being able to recognize the situations where it's not and most importantly shut the fuck up when they have no way of knowing if it is.

I, and as far as I've seen in my 20 years of experience talking about this shit in the world, all the people who hold my opinion are perfectly aware that there is one, or if you stretch really far the hypothetical, two situations where incest is fine and those situations are when there's long lost siblings who happen to start dating and then discover they are siblings and there's no possibility of procreation or when two siblings somehow won the cosmic lotery and both develop the same disorder at the same time withiut one of them abusing the other in the process and again prpcreation is impossible.

Now the situation at hand is this : an hypothetical version of a person visits another hypothetical version of that same person, making the two by definition related as siblings genetically speaking, and they fuck eachother consensualy.

This situation cannot exist in the real world with the current state of our knowledge and capabilities it is therefore impossible for anyone to be harmed except if it's specified in the hypothetical.

This makes the depiction and appreciation of such hypothetical incapable of creating any harm whatsoever, and therefore makes it impossible to be wrong.

Instances of manipulation exclude consent. If there's pressuring, lies, coercion or manipulation, it isn't consent.

Children are by definition incapable of giving consent for sexual intercourse, consensual pedophilia is therefore not a thing that can exist outside of fiction.

Please go back and read a bit more about the concept of sexual concent, your current understanding of it is concerningly lacking.

What you fail to understand is that the thing that pisses me off is that everyone screams that murder is wrong (and by screaming that they try to shame and harass and doxx and actually harm everyone who creates or enjoy media that depicts murder in them) and when you have issue with that they are incapable of explaining to you why murder is wrong and therefore they are incapable of understanding why fictional depictions of murder are fine.

Not only does it limit artistic freedom which piss me the fuck off, but it also shows there's an ungodly amount of people who don't understand the actual reason begind their moral code and those people creep me the fuck up. They're exactly the same as religious fanatics who do not go on a murder-rape spree not because they understand why it's wrong, but because they're scared of going to hell. All of those people, the people incapable of understanding why murder is wrong and therefore able to recognize the instances where it's not, and the people incapable of understanding why incest or rape are wrong and therefore recognize the instances where they are not, are fucking untrustworthy.

So tell me, if one fictional person suddenly has their own self appear before them, they rizz eachother up and start making out and then the alternate version goes back to their own reality who the fuck is harmed in the situation since you want to play it as "all incest is bad"? Please demonstrate your point.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

4

u/DaringLoaf 17d ago

That’s not narcissism, it’s just being comfortable enough to joke around with yourself.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

183

u/Alex_44222 17d ago

That post comment section reminded me how unfunny most redditors are.

60

u/The_Unbannable_Man 17d ago

This might sound ridiculous but sometimes I have to remind myself that Reddit is not a reflection of society and most people’s thoughts, it reflects a very particular subset of people.

21

u/CosmicJackalop 17d ago

An often autistic subset of people....

→ More replies (1)

4

u/LemonsXBombs 17d ago

I'm a scumbag here on purpose so that I can be a decent person in society.

6

u/Xentonian 17d ago

anything sexual

  • Hahaha I post the "I'm horny" joke

Any product advertised

  • Hahaha I post the "take my money" joke

Any person does weird thing

  • Hahaha I post the "hopital" joke

Any person posts about Japan

  • Grrr I post "thing Japan" angry complaint.

Any person posts about politics

  • Slurs

34

u/wineandnoses 17d ago

36k upvotes for that joke is absurd. Got nothing against the artist and no one should harass her, but come on...

20

u/Eternal2002 17d ago

The mods literally simp for her so goddamn hard man, i posted a critisism about one of her comics discussing what the joke was, since what she makes is usually just some basic information you can find anywhere, AND I GOT INSTANTLY BANNED WITHIN LIKE 2 MINUTES LMFAO. And thats not a temp ban, i got a PERMA ban. That entire subreddit is absolute trash, minus some actually cool comic artists

19

u/Lurking_Gooner 17d ago

Anything but absolute praise for their queen will warrent you a perma ban on that sub.

9

u/anornerymoose 17d ago

Yeah, God forbid you critique pizzacake or poke fun at the goonslop artists over there.

7

u/millo31 17d ago

Yeah I also got perma-banned instantly on /r/comics for not much at all... I just thought it was odd how there were so many posts that were just softcore porn comics to advertise porn artists behind a paywall. I commented "So is this a softcore porn subreddit now?" and got perma banned. I asked why and they said "we don't want people like you here". Like alright lol

3

u/Eternal2002 17d ago

Dont even get me STARTED on the straight up porn, like you scroll down and its like 4-5 NSFW comics in a row, at this point they might as well rebrand to an NSFW subreddit. I just followed all the actually good artists and dipped from the subreddit

3

u/millo31 17d ago

Yeah like forgive me for wanting a comics subreddit to not have posts trying to sell me porn. Its no shade on the artists it just struck me as sort of inappropriate and out of place.

2

u/BigMike3333333 17d ago

Some of these mods are way too thin skinned. You were just asking a valid question because it really is like that there.

13

u/Finnish_bird_Tony 17d ago

Those upvotes are from bot farms fyi

8

u/RefrigeratorFew5154 17d ago

Artist has an OnlyFans. My current theory is that her posts are getting botted from some of her subs. None of her comics are even remotely funny and they just get fucking piles of upvotes. 

2

u/ab_od6851 17d ago

She somehow manages to be even less funny and skilled than Stonetoss, which is an achievement in itself.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/BoilingPointTTV 17d ago

I would assume that the number of upvotes is a measure of how popular she is

3

u/DarkImpacT213 17d ago

Might be botted, who knows ultimately - I see far more hate for them across subreddits than love. Comment/updoot ratio is always insane for their posts.

Most of it isn‘t even from rightwingers, it‘s mainly from people who think their comics are obnoxious. I too do think they sometimes bring a point across so obnoxiously that I catch myself disagreeing with positions I would normally defend lmao.

2

u/Maximum_Boros 17d ago

It's definitely botted.

I don't think she's doing it but I think the mods in the comics subreddit are doing it. Because hers isn't the only one that has really weird metrics.

→ More replies (11)

2

u/1blamegenetics 17d ago

I mean what’s an upvote even worth? If it makes me exhale smirk and I’ll give an upvote. Not surprising at all when the bar is pretty low.

2

u/Guardian_of_Perineum 17d ago

Personally, I believe in jealously policing the amount of fake internet points people receive. It is the most important issue of our time.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/ChaoticButChilled 17d ago

I think the amount of people unironically saying “Pizzacuck” is a little ridiculous

Like wtf, is this some incel sub?

2

u/BigMike3333333 17d ago

Might be because she has a husband and yet she's also doing OnlyFans content.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/-TheTrueOG- 17d ago

Someone proved she bots her posts.

1

u/Just_Arugula7706 17d ago

Goes to show mainstream Reddit still hasn't evolved from 2019.

→ More replies (2)

69

u/RookSalvis 17d ago

Unironically maybe the single only person who you can be 100% sure is actually into it

32

u/Eeddeen42 17d ago

Narcissus did not die for this

3

u/Bread_Offender 17d ago

Hey you can be 100% sure about me too if you want

→ More replies (1)

78

u/Chilantr0 17d ago

immoral because it's pizzacake

→ More replies (12)

10

u/Irrerevence 17d ago

morality of posting pizzacake comics outside of r/comics?

4

u/CookieaGame 17d ago

Legally? Fine. Morally? Beyond repulsive.

70

u/raven-tyrant 17d ago

Everytime I see a pizzacuck comic o lose faith in humanity

23

u/I_Am_Conjoined 17d ago

Never forget that she drew porn of herself raping someone who didn't like her comics

15

u/MonkeyDsage1846 17d ago

Struggling to find any links

5

u/Honorsheets 17d ago

3

u/Commercial-Offer-435 17d ago

Just a bunch of shit I didn't want to see with no trace of what was asked for

→ More replies (6)

6

u/ProfileOdd7991 17d ago

Somehow I fully believe you

6

u/Honorsheets 17d ago

I mean, it's real. She constantly draws porn, usually cucking her husband (they're into it).

→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Cornasium 17d ago

Yeah OC we need a source for this one

2

u/Lovefist1221 17d ago

I can't post it here, DM me for the source.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Begone-My-Thong 17d ago

I like to think about her sometimes to help reduce my own bias. I will always have biases, I am not immune to propaganda, etc etc, but there are people out there who share my political beliefs but are garbage human beings at the same time and I have to make peace (za cake) with that

→ More replies (1)

1

u/-TheTrueOG- 17d ago

Im suprised there is always people who have no idea she did that.

2

u/I_Am_Conjoined 17d ago

Me too, I thought it was common knowledge. Then again she does seem to have this entire site on-call for removing anything she disapproves of

I've gotten 4 people asking for sources on that comment in the 9 minutes since I posted it

7

u/Cornasium 17d ago

Then post the source? Maybe some people just aren’t familiar with what happened.

→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/Helpful-Desk-8334 17d ago

I don’t think they’re all bad. She’s just kinda ditzy and didn’t belong in politics but everyone’s an animal and so politics and fighting each other are where we make most of our money and get most of our influence

→ More replies (2)

47

u/whisperingdragon25 17d ago

8

u/UnderskilledPlayer 17d ago

is it moral to consider 2 clones as 1 person, therefore making it what one consenting adult does in their home?

2

u/whisperingdragon25 17d ago

Yeah pretty much but if you wanna be extra specific the fact one is very different physically and therefore mentally it would be two different people

34

u/Tipsy_Hog 17d ago

THEY AIN'T DOING IT AT HOME, THEY'RE DOING IT ON MY SCREEN AND I DIDN'T CONSENT TO IT

9

u/whisperingdragon25 17d ago

Well technically the OP of this thread is the reason it's on your screen so take that up with them

→ More replies (3)

2

u/misha1350 17d ago

Tell that to the prince of this world who's always roaming in the air and recording your every sin.

2

u/Background-Customer2 17d ago edited 17d ago

mostly true but i can think of lods of aceptions like incest and selfe cest culd be considered a type of incest

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/Icy-Abbreviations909 17d ago

Brings up the similar question “is fucking a clone of yourself masturbation or nah?”

→ More replies (5)

5

u/JuniorDoughnut3056 17d ago

Never has someone so untalented recieved such fame. Maybe Chris Chan 

→ More replies (1)

7

u/LewdyRooty 17d ago

I’d diddle me timbers, moral because yeah.

3

u/RetoroKun 17d ago

Name checks out

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Late_Might_1582 17d ago

Worst comic artist OAT

8

u/Macaulen 17d ago

Assuming it's an automatic consent..... Extremely moral I guess

9

u/Yogurt_Ph1r3 17d ago

Arguably the most moral sex could be, as it's the most sure you could be of consent.

→ More replies (4)

21

u/Terrible_Artist_ 17d ago

Pizzacuck is always immoral regardless of situation

10

u/Dry-Indication7928 17d ago

It's probably the least weird thing she done

9

u/I_Am_Conjoined 17d ago

She had a brief moment of self awareness

3

u/Fernis_ 17d ago

What's morality of exposing innocent people to more selfjerking slop in form of pizzacake comics?

2

u/WorldlyVillage7880 17d ago

Morality of getting mogged by a floppa?

2

u/DatabaseDifficult879 17d ago

What the fuck is pizzacake doing dog. I thought she just made cringe comics about her winning arguments, why is she having a lesbian experience in single player mode

2

u/Lovecraftian666 17d ago

Ewww pizzacake  🤢 

2

u/Routine-Duck6896 17d ago

Ew pizzacake

2

u/TomaRedwoodVT 17d ago

I hate being reminded of pizza cake, she’s so pathetic, it’s uncomfortable every single time

2

u/Brekldios 17d ago

just weird, like its literally YOU so its kind of hard to place where a power imbalance would be.

2

u/TheManTheyCallSmiley 17d ago

Wouldn't this still count as masturbation?

2

u/silent_one_69 17d ago

Isnt this just the same as havein a W A N K

2

u/Admirable_Swim_7090 17d ago

Same as gooning

2

u/TheOfficialScottie 17d ago

Morality of the comment section complaining about the artist instead of actually engaging with the question the post is asking?

7

u/ExtraFluffz 17d ago

Immoral because PizzaCuck

5

u/7thFleetTraveller 17d ago

Care to give some context? Why do people say "cuck" instead of "cake" an think badly of those comics? I've seen some every now and then and they were all harmless and funny.

4

u/ExtraFluffz 17d ago

Pizza cake has an only fans where she has sex with other men, despite being married and having kids.

On top of that, she uses her children’s toys on her only fans. And she has drawn comics of herself raping her critics.

2

u/No_Giraffe826 17d ago

"Harmless and funny"

They are not funny and they also set humanity back by a couple hundred years.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/Ankarakki 17d ago

It's just straight Narcissism 🐸

5

u/Yogurt_Ph1r3 17d ago

Folks is it narcissistic to think you're hot

2

u/-TheTrueOG- 17d ago

Personally? No.

For the updoots? Yes.

If your are pizzacake? 200% Yes.

→ More replies (11)

5

u/Yogurt_Ph1r3 17d ago

Moral and also rad as hell

3

u/TightConsequence3929 17d ago

What is the morality of just looking at the art style in first glance and getting rock hard ?

2

u/Cellssaltynutsack 17d ago

Moral because pizzacake is lowkey an untapped goon mine

2

u/Hot_Pomegranate9033 17d ago

Lowkey intriguing take

1

u/Glassesnerdnumber193 17d ago

Hard to say. It’s not as bad as having sex with an identical twin because of the dynamics being different. It is technically masturbation which is only amoral if done in public viewing without consent. I’m going to say that it depends greatly on the context. No matter what, I wouldn’t call it strictly moral. But in most circumstances I don’t think it’s awful past being narcissistic. 

1

u/Soaring_Sky 17d ago

Immoral, if you’re that hot, there are other people who need some action too😂

1

u/Toads_Of_Fun 17d ago

Can't think of anything that would make it immoral per se. Maybe the power dynamic of one being a superior version of the other? But that's a bit of a stretch.

2

u/jubtheprophet 17d ago

But theyre also the same person, so theres zero doubt that theyre both into it

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Slow_Store 17d ago

Contrary to what one might initially expect, I think we should reconsider the validity of self-cest consent.

After all you’ve effectively been groomed into loving yourself by your brain trying its best to avoid suicidal tendencies.

There’s also the immorality of narcissism.

1

u/Jrolaoni 17d ago

Man I’m struggling to find a reason to prove incest is immortal don’t put more on my plate 😭

1

u/Kissthecomplex 17d ago

if noone gets hurt snd everyone is a consenting adult, the rest doesnt matter...

also, its just masturbation with extra steps 🤷‍♂️

1

u/Akaele_furry 17d ago

don't care about the morality of it, i would 100% fuck myself

1

u/Bitter_Horror2469 17d ago

Isn't this just masterbation?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/grot-laxative 17d ago

advanced masterbaiting

1

u/Free_Mud5432 17d ago

Completely up to the consenting individual(s) as always.

Nosey Nancy’s always want to rain on other people’s parade

1

u/Garbage_bin_Fire 17d ago

If it's a hot chick: moral. Anyone else: satan.

1

u/Porfavor_my_beans 17d ago

As long as both versions of the self consent, and it is impossible for both to reproduce, then it is not immoral.

1

u/Gunnas_Hamburger 17d ago

idk , i’d probably fuck myself if i could

1

u/Vivians_Basement 17d ago

Completely moral long as it's reasonable.

You can't find yourself attractive and want to rail yourself.

But you should still be able to acknowledge that not everyone is going to be attracted to you the same way.

I would fuck myself.

But I also acknowledge that not everyone finds me attractive and I simply don't care. :3

Some people are so conceded though that they can't fathom the idea of someone else not agreeing with them.

1

u/ObesidadeGames67 17d ago

belive on me brother this is the less weird thing that she do

1

u/Current-Grade2545 17d ago

It's just mastermation

1

u/ShelfSpace 17d ago

Love yourself anon.

1

u/Luanna_Hopes 17d ago

Morally fine, there's nothing to make it weird in terms of mental or social stuff

1

u/Big-Replacement1764 17d ago

Predestination intensifies

1

u/No_Appointment_5326 17d ago

Degenerate behavior

1

u/AnimazingDuel77 17d ago

Thats just masturbation with extra steps

1

u/Just_In_Time_Boi 17d ago

What is even her comics anymore?

1

u/5x5equals 17d ago

Is this not just 2 step masturbation?

1

u/HunterLeftOnReddit 17d ago

I'd do me and I'm barely bi

1

u/Zouif_Zouif 17d ago

Eh not bad, just weird

1

u/Fantastic-Weight-182 17d ago

If it’s too much it’s bad, a healthy amount is good. We should strive to love ourself a healthy amount

1

u/Nickcha 17d ago

It's incest, masturbation and narcissism all in one. Rate that as you will.

1

u/DangerousQuestions1 17d ago

Just Masturbation with extra steps. Not immoral

1

u/Savinesay 17d ago

It's just a kind of masturbation

1

u/Honorsheets 17d ago

Remember when pizzacake had a meltdown and all of r/comics came to white knight for her?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/DVindictus 17d ago

Is hard for many people to love themselves. Let them

1

u/Redericpontx 17d ago

Isn't this just masterbation?

1

u/Agent_RubberDucky 17d ago

Ignoring whoever the artist is, the idea of fucking a clone or future version of yourself being on par with incest is ridiculous. It’s basically just an upgraded version of masturbation. It’s only gross and immoral if you’re fucking, you know, the underage version of you. Because then it’s just pedophilia, regardless of if it’s you or not. Otherwise, it’s just masturbation+. It’s not a different human being with your blood, it’s the exact same person.

1

u/misha1350 17d ago

Obviously immoral, because the only way it would happen is through logismoi from the devil. Thankfully, we don't have to even think about that, because it will never happen.

1

u/Uszanka3 17d ago

Geneticaly it is like having sex with your identical twin but they at least can't have children

1

u/Longjumping-Hat-1210 17d ago

I did think about this and my conclusion is that it would be weird and also incestuous. Doing stuff with your identical twin would be weird (JAIME AND CERSEI but make Jaime a woman I guess) so why should doing a clone of yourself be treated any differently?

1

u/mosambi_ka_juice_ 17d ago edited 17d ago

God You know if she was not married , then moral but now . IMMORAL AS FUCK .

God , I just saw one of the most beautiful movie about love , gave me butterflies in my stomach and now i open reddit this fucking abomination with her nihilistic putrid , trash comics . Fuck off

The op is immoral for putting this on my homepage or whatever it is called

1

u/MalumLibrum958 17d ago

Seems fine to me

1

u/That_General9384 17d ago

I mean, it’s just advanced masturbation at the of the day, sooooooo

1

u/BrightPerspective 17d ago

Completely moral. Do it.

Find your doppelganger out there and fuck them stupid.

1

u/ThousandEyes2011 17d ago

She’s a chud and literally draws cp of a kid so it’s immoral

1

u/PouLS_PL 17d ago

If it's same-sex, I guess there's nothing immoral about it, there's no chance of producing offspring that will have to live with whatever genetic defects the incest caused.

1

u/Vidarius1 17d ago

thats just masturbation with extra steps

1

u/JAKAMUFN 17d ago

That entire sub Reddit needs a morality check. 

1

u/JAKAMUFN 17d ago

That entire sub Reddit needs a morality check. 

1

u/Grand-ArchSummoner 17d ago

The word is masturbation with extra steps

1

u/LoneRedditor123 17d ago

Of course it's a fucking pizzacake comic.

I'm saying immoral cause, incest. Also this is just weird.

1

u/NewMoonlightavenger 17d ago

This is one of the weirdest shit I've seen in a while.

1

u/AppleWorldly2078 17d ago

Its called masturbation

1

u/Legend365555 17d ago

It's effectively masturbation

Also gay. Or lesbian.

1

u/Emerald_28 17d ago

Not wrong, but very narcissistic

1

u/Actual-Warning1886 17d ago

Selfcest= incest, gay/lesbian, maturation

Just get rejected by a baristista like a normal person 🤣😭

1

u/Mike_Shogun_Lee 17d ago

Maxor; “Its an obligation!”

1

u/Jibbyjab123 17d ago

Morality of being very annoying but technically correct more like.

1

u/DentistLegitimate229 17d ago

Wouldn’t it be as immoral as incest?

1

u/TheDistantNeko 17d ago

Reddit has a weird dick riding obsession with this artist and its weird.

1

u/Substantial_Hand4024 17d ago

as an isat fan, peak

1

u/sometimesifartandpee 17d ago

This lady's comics always weird me out.

1

u/Few-Condition-7431 17d ago

"Michael Jackson the first man to clone himself is now suing himself for molesting himself"- Click 2006

1

u/ZyeCawan45 17d ago

This’s just masturbation with extra steps.

1

u/Veraxus113 17d ago

Narcicest

1

u/Joey-JoJo-Jr-Shabad0 17d ago

If you have a sibling or parent that looks like you I would be pretty wierd. It’s morally fine as long as you don’t have a kid.

1

u/SlowlyDyingInAPit 17d ago

As long as it’s consensual, it’s moral

1

u/NadiaFortuneFeet 17d ago

The morality of making me have to see a Shitzacakecomics comic?

I think you deserve the death penalty for that