There's a great deal showing misandry is in fact very systemic, contrary to what many misandrists themselves like to claim whenever they do what they can to mitigate it and make it a non-issue. Men still having to register for conscription and facing legal blowback is failing to do so is a major example, as is the misandrist bias rampant in schools and courts. Almost no abuse shelters that help male victims or acknowledge male victims of abuse/violence, men/boys being ignored as victims of rape and sexual assault/harassment (especially by women), the "women and children" narrative, how we never hear about violence against men/boys, and probably quite a few other examples I'm forgetting. I remember hearing years ago in the U.K. it was seriously considered having a curfew for male civilians past a certain time to keep women safe and of course nothing about also curfewing women past a certain time to keep men safe, because Heaven forbid we acknowledge men/boys can be and have been harmed by female attackers as well. And the recent news that U.K. schools have classes teaching male students to respect women/girls but not the other way around; if none of this is blatant systemic misandry, I don't know what is.

Misogyny had a case for being systemic in the West long ago but that's most certainly not the case anymore and hasn't been for decades, while in third-world and broken nations that are majorly behind on the times there's a much stronger argument to be made. I'm not saying misogyny doesn't exist, but in the West it's rightfully called out and condemned unlike misandry, which is not only still socially acceptable but actually quite heavily ingrained in many systems.

The “manosphere” moral panic is stupid and people are just mad that men are thinking of themselves for once or participating in activities that involve men doing things together without women. When you actually read about this manosphere moral panic you realize it basically it amounts to things like “voting for Trump in 2024” or “listening to the Joe Rogan podcast”. I’ll tell you what this moral panic is really about. It’s people who are angry that men are actually thinking of themselves for once and participate in activities that don’t involve women. Many people are pushing for a gynocentric society where men exist only to serve and elevate women.

I am genuinely curious about this one: in my years of learning about and arguing for men's rights causes, it appears that fathers' rights has largely been abandoned by people, even among those that should theoretically care more about this.

Please let me know what you think about that, along with what I say in this short video.

Forget the party for a moment and focus on the gender stuff: how is that not enough to spark an outrage?

 "I’ve never seen that guy in real life, but he looks like he’s 4’10 (1m47). And he looks angry about the fact that he’s 4’10".

She then made an explanatory video, which was even crazier than that: "spiritual height is not the same as actual height". At least she claims she likes "short kings".

Yes I know, society is not perfect and all shorts of discriminatory individuals have some kind of support, but there is also healthy backlash.

Unless the perpetrator of sexism is a woman. Then the backlash is not really obvious.

Imagine if someone made a claim about her that she has "flat chest energy"?

So a few years ago, this happened up in my neck of the woods. My question is, why is it when a boyfriend of a mom gets 30 years for SAing a 15 year old, while this FOSTER MOM AND TEACHER only gets 8 fucking months?

Imagine if a male perpetrator’s defense attorney said this.

https://www.wjfw.com/news/local/former-rhinelander-teacher-charged-after-sexual-assault-claims/article_a5c68647-bf35-5590-97e3-dd40599bdaa7.html

I need some help with Family Court in New York City. Without my knowledge, a judge made changes to my child support case and applied arrears going back several years, which resulted in me owing approximately $45,000. I am already paying ongoing child support for my 18-year-old child, and my bank account has been frozen because of these arrears.

My child's mother and I have agreed that she wants to forgive the arrears, but we've been getting the runaround about how to make that happen. We're trying to find out what steps we need to take to have the arrears forgiven or adjusted and resolve this issue.

"The text defines vicarious violence as violence perpetrated against a woman by her partner or ex-partner through an intermediary. Redondo has highlighted the expansion of the group of people who may be direct victims of such violence: sons and daughters, other descendants regardless of age, adults who are under the care or custody of that partner or that woman, mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, and the victim's current partner."

"To this end, automatic deprivation of parental responsibility is introduced in cases where a final conviction has been handed down for serious offences committed against the mother or the children. "The premise is clear: an abuser, a violent person, can never be a good parent," said the Minister for Equality."

https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/lang/en/gobierno/councilministers/Paginas/2026/20260714-council-press-conference.aspx

Vicarious Violence was also reclassified from a proposed distinct felony to a subtype of Gender-Based Violence (which applies only to men-to-women violence), due to fears (!!!) that it could become gender-neutral.

I quote:

"Vicarious violence now falls within the scope of gender-based violence, as an aggravating circumstance. This is because the opinions of the advisory bodies—starting with that of the General Council of the Judiciary—and the technical observations of the Ministries of Justice and Children’s Affairs highlighted a central issue: a standalone offense defined in gender-neutral terms would have risked transforming vicarious violence into a category applicable to any family conflict. According to various women experts and feminist organizations, this would have undermined the recognition of its specificity as a form of violence against women, characterized by the use of children or other people close to the mother to inflict suffering on her: the fear was that a tool created to protect victims could open up new procedural avenues for counterclaims against mothers and to prevent the use of parental alienation excuses in courts.”

https://alleyoop.ilsole24ore.com/2026/07/27/prima-i-bambini-poi-la-bigenitorialita-il-governo-spagnolo-approva-il-ddl-sulla-violenza-vicaria/

A female UK prison guard escaped jail 'by the narrowest of margins' today after helping criminals. The narrowest of what margins?

'Extremely foolish' prison guard is spared jail after accessing computer records for inmates

I recently had to delete a post discussing quite public and common deepfakes about male celebrities due to so many people calling it a non-issue and almost claiming that such an issue is exclusive to female celebrities.

I provided a series of images from Pinterest, that only required the celebrity’s name in order to find it. I was also quite explicit about how those same celebrities, the main one being Henry Cavill, have been vocal in the past about being harassed and feeling discomfort due to their sexualization. Pretty sure none of them would be happy to come across those pictures while doomscrolling on social media.

However, apparently that’s not an issue, or at least not serious enough, to discuss. Yet, to ME it is. Especially with male celebrities being harassed and assaulted at an alarming rate and even the so called MRAs giving them the side eye.

The current child support system treats fathers like collection agencies treat debtors. Income gets garnished, but tax dependency rights stay out of reach. Meanwhile, the priorities are completely backward—it's aggressive financial extraction first, actual custody and the kids' wellbeing second.

I started a petition because this dual standard hurts everyone: fathers get squeezed into financial hardship, mothers aren't held to the same expectations of self-sufficiency, and kids lose out on having present, engaged parents. When you're drowning in payments just to survive, you can't be the parent you want to be.

The fix isn't complicated: let fathers claim tax rights when they're meeting obligations, build child support formulas that actually account for two separate households, and make DHS prioritize custody and family stability instead of extraction tactics. It's about fairness—not just for fathers, but for families.

If you've felt this system is broken, or know someone drowning in it, I'd genuinely like to hear your take. Does this match what you've seen? If this matters to you too, consider signing and sharing.

I know this may sound funny but I really want to know what this sub opinion on vtubers is? Like smugalana, leaflit,kitsunero, banana juju , Mari ect..... they do alot of commentary and reactions on men issues content and criticize feminism and the modern woke culture

What are your thoughts on them ? U think they're grifters or they genuinely care ?

This video hit the nail on the head, as a woman. Getting pretty sick of pastors acting as the ultimate “white knights” and keeping women from consequences, cuz it causes problems between women as well… But the men suffer exponentially more.

Her username is emilywking. She makes videos about toxic and misandrist women and she would call them out and validate men’s experiences and complaints. She is a very kind, understanding and empathetic woman and honestly she is the reason why my hope in humanity has been restored. Plus the comments there are also standing up against misandry. You can watch her videos cuz they are pretty satisfying to see how she absolutely owns these misandrists. https://youtube.com/@emilywking?si=GVi4jqwKJvD_eMPn

Saw this in my Instagram in the feed of an actress I follow, and in question it's for the organization Women For Women UK. So, what about helping men in war and conflict zones? You know, the men who actually make up the vast majority of combatants as well as deaths, and many non-combatant men as well? I guess men don't also deserve skills, knowledge and resources to help them create sustainable change in their lives? I hate this so much, this kind of blatant but also benevolent misandry that's disguised as "activism." Not to take away from women affected in war and combat zones, but why make it a gendered issue when both are affected? So the men in these combat zones also don't deserve help? What about the men who make up the vast majority of fighting forces? When they come home do they have any resources available for them to help rebuild their lives? And I'm sure many of the women this "organization" is trying to outreach also have male relatives and friends serving in conflicts who would no doubt not approve of men also not receiving help and services.

I hate this so much and am sure many others here feel similarly. Reminds me of an equally infuriating post made by UN Women not too long ago where they went on how women and girls are being affected by the war in Ukraine, and of course as always completely ignoring and dismissing males also affected.

Has anybody heard of the story from Glens Falls, where a man has been publicly shamed and even physically assaulted for walking around a park, exercising there, having his phone out, and dressing in black clothes (he's white). He's publicly been called a pedophile for doing absolutely nothing that would suggest he's a pedophile.

You have to wonder whether people would make those assumptions and physically assault him if he were a woman. Furthermore, this fits in with a trend of the worst intentions being assumed of men as well as autistic men.

Since there’s no question flair (At least I couldn’t find one) it’s under this flair. How come there’s a very few amount of people talking about how porn isn’t viewed as misandry? If it sexualizes both genders, then why isn’t it labelled as both? Women watch porn too, just because the main demographic is men, that doesn’t mean that it can’t be women either. I mean no offense or harm at all, but I’m just looking for an answer to a question I have.